Seti got crushed cause he literally brought the weakest, most debunkable approach to his debate with Nasi.
Whereas Polight and the ISUPK were a wash. Both sides showed their ignorance throughout and misquoted the bible to fit their poor arguments. Polight looked super lame with his horrible attempts at tying things together via etymology. Tazaryah c00ned it up heavy with his use of books which promote the racist/eurocentric
Hamitic Hypothesis, ...
Along with their fake version of Hebrew.
The only way to debunk "Hebrew-Israelite" theology is by actually honoring scripture. This means NOT trying to debunk the bible, while using it in it's correct context. It also means knowing the languages it was written in (Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek), and actually reading it...
especially the parts that deal with the conversion of other nations/strangers to Israel in both the Old and New Testament.
Having a solid grasp on both Asiatic and African history is a must as well.
That's why I respect Nasi, despite my disagreement with his "Hebrew Israelite" viewpoints and overall stance concerning the New Testament. He approached his debate perfectly. Knew more about Kemet than Seti did. Made Seti looked completely unlearned. If anyone came out a winner from both debates, it was him.
