Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Messages
1,202
Reputation
-780
Daps
1,414
I watched the debate, and all I can say is :smh: for both parties involved.

When I get a chance, I'ma give a detailed breakdown exposing all their flawed arguments. Cause there was a ton of nonsense said by both.

Polight came off extremely ignorant during the portions that dealt with Eve, Jeremiah 44:25 (which he took outta context) along with all the other bible verses, the supposed Abraham/Hindusim connection and especially the part about the Sumerian tablets.

But Tazaryah was just as bad. I'ma show @Drummage_EL and @LionofJudah all the flaws in his arguments. From the Magen David, to the fake Hebrew he uses, to the stuff he said about Africa. But I'ma really expose the books he quoted and Bible verses he misused to make his claims.

Why are you mentioning my name???
Are you a egyptologist?
Did I offend you or something? :lolbron:
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,047
Reputation
1,142
Daps
12,103
Reppin
Harlem
just finished the whole debate minus the Q&A. all i can say is :snoop:


polight won by default because the IUSPK assertions are so far out there (blacks are closer genetically to white people than africans :what:), but neither one put on a good performance imo. polight was coming with good information at times, but he also came with a lot of weak information. that whole shyt about the IUSPK being a non-profit was hella weak and that was his opening argument :snoop: i liked when he showed the similarities the bible had with older texts, thought he should have spent more time on that.

but all that shyt with bringing out his wives, spinning them around was extra. those fukking victory laps were extra extra. the victory laps woulda been funny if he was killing IUSPK in the debate, but he wasn't.

havent seen the vid for imam and ahmose, but from the post debate vids i can tell my reaction will be :snoop: both those dudes are really looking like clowns.

and sa neter in the middle of it all looking and sounding like a poor man's don king :snoop:

at the end of the day i didn't expect much from these other cats, but i did from polight. he killed IUSPK because their beliefs are so flawed, but he should of obliterated those negroes and he didn't.
 

LionofJudah

Banned
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
6,372
Reputation
835
Daps
11,600
Reppin
NULL
Why are you mentioning my name???
Are you a egyptologist?
Did I offend you or something? :lolbron:

He's a filthy kike lying on Hebrew Israelites while pretending to be an ex-member because he knows the truth is coming out. You should check out my thread in The Race Track for the latest massacre I just served up with his bytch ass.
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,047
Reputation
1,142
Daps
12,103
Reppin
Harlem
So how many of you here co-sign that "black woman is god" doctrine?

whether we're talking about the act of physical creation... or talking about things in the world that deserve to be worshipped, in either case--THE BLACK WOMAN IS GOD :blessed:
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,047
Reputation
1,142
Daps
12,103
Reppin
Harlem
:ohhh:

:ooh:
EDIT: Where are our muslim brovas and sistahs to address these claims

dude is sending some serious heatrocks at the desert dwellers

im not a koran/muslim scholar by far...

what are the implications of certain terms in the koran coming from an earlier language? almost every written text in existence contains words that originated from older languages, but why is this so detrimental in the case of the koran?
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-564
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
im not a koran/muslim scholar by far...

what are the implications of certain terms in the koran coming from an earlier language? almost every written text in existence contains words that originated from older languages, but why is this so detrimental in the case of the koran?

For me, it is the suggestion that islam was written by followers of the two major religions that it "competes" with today
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,711
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
im not a koran/muslim scholar by far...

what are the implications of certain terms in the koran coming from an earlier language? almost every written text in existence contains words that originated from older languages, but why is this so detrimental in the case of the koran?

it exposes that islam is not the black man's religion, we already know christianity isnt and also combined with the history of the islamic slave trade its kinda of a wrap for islam as far as being a vehicle for black people moving forward
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,047
Reputation
1,142
Daps
12,103
Reppin
Harlem
it exposes that islam is not the black man's religion, we already know christianity isnt and also combined with the history of the islamic slave trade its kinda of a wrap for islam as far as being a vehicle for black people moving forward

what if both christianity and islam were originally "black" religions though? which i believe they were...
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,711
Reputation
555
Daps
22,615
Reppin
Arrakis
what if both christianity and islam were originally "black" religions though? which i believe they were...

im not sure how that would change anything if isalm and chistianity were originally black, chistianity of today went through the council of nicea and islam of today went through islamic/arab imperialists, so any "black" was washed off centuries ago from both religions

i personally dont care what they were originally, they are both garbage and they are both based on human fabrications and are not based on reality

but back to your original question, islamists try to present their religion as an alternative to christianity, and the points Shakka was making points to that notion being a lie
 
Top