Hold up! So King Solomon from THE BIBLE had 700 WIVES and 300 SIDE CHICKS but ONLY had... 4 children?

Uitomy

Superstar
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
12,174
Reputation
1,601
Daps
43,892
Reppin
Anxiety attacks and sugar cookies
I feel like if someone claimed that many women back then people would legit decide to just kill him. Like, I don't know how many Israelites were around back then but taking 1000 women out of the pool to choose from would fukk up a lot of young men's options even if the population was 1million. I don't think people would stand for that shyt.
Actually most of the women werent israelites, literally says he took women Yahawah said not to. So he ain't really mess up the pool
 

Uitomy

Superstar
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
12,174
Reputation
1,601
Daps
43,892
Reppin
Anxiety attacks and sugar cookies
Hmmm interesting, so "They" framed things as the women were evil for followimg other religions such as Orixia and other African religions which gave Us an identity amd as such were deemed the embodiments of teachings of satan as well.... .........and to repent means to follow the "true" god, which happened to also be pale........ the depths of mental manipulation at play..... :banderas:
:francis:
That's way too simple of an analysis, these women were from other bigger nations that usually followed the Babylonian God pantheon, what you listed probably was no where on the radar as those tribes weren't really involved with Solomon's kingdom
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
5,161
Reputation
1,132
Daps
11,794
That's way too simple of an analysis, these women were from other bigger nations that usually followed the Babylonian God pantheon, what you listed probably was no where on the radar as those tribes weren't really involved with Solomon's kingdom
Possibly, but that depends on how you are viewing the bible.

I'm looking at it as a book of tales that have been weaponized to indoctrinate swathes of people into being submissive to a collection of people through the use of mass pyschological manipulation. So the factualnessn of the book is irrelevant to me. But I do appreciate what you're saying.
 

Uitomy

Superstar
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
12,174
Reputation
1,601
Daps
43,892
Reppin
Anxiety attacks and sugar cookies
Possibly, but that depends on how you are viewing the bible.

I'm looking at it as a book of tales that have been weaponized to indoctrinate swathes of people into being submissive to a collection of people through the use of mass pyschological manipulation. So the factualnessn of the book is irrelevant to me. But I do appreciate what you're saying.
True, but I think reality itself has been weaponized by white peoples at this point. Like literally everything, from the Bible, to car loans, globalism, food, just another drop in the bucket, and realistically it's crazy it was even weaponized in the first place since most of the instruction in the Bible is basically "avoid doing xyz, and do xyz to yourself, separate from non believers"

So shyt like the Roman Catholic Church is literally the biggest scam of all time
 

Budda

Superstar
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reputation
832
Daps
27,242
The bible only mentions 4 children if I remember right. It doesn't say he only had 4 children total.
Exactly the bible I think only mentions Solomon’s children by Israelite women, it only mentions 3 I think the fourth is widely acknowledge as Menelik but that info is from the Kebra Negast
 

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,882
Reputation
3,120
Daps
55,969
they will surely turn your hearts after their gods.” Nevertheless, Solomon held fast to them in love.
3 He had seven hundred wives of royal birth and three hundred concubines, and his wives led him astray.
4 As Solomon grew old, his wives turned his heart after other gods, and his heart was not fully devoted to the LORD

A lot of the messages of the Bible aren’t literal. A ‘god’ in this context can be an idea, an ideology. Certain women can be gold diggers and turn you to the ‘god’ money.

There’s a reason the Bible says ‘let them with ears hear’.
 
Top