There are two sides to the FDR coin:
FDR did a lot of things wrong like the New Deal did nothing to address segregation or other forms of employment discrimination. The programs from his GI Bill were locally administered, meaning white officials were free to interpret it how they wanted (read as not allowing Black servicemen use the benefits). He didn’t invite Jessie Owens to the Whitehouse after winning four gold medals because he was black (if it had been for being an OSU alumnus, I would be defending FDR
). He failed to fully desegregate the military even though he agreed to. Hell, I'd say it's clear that he was at best indifferent towards racial segregation. Overall, he did not fight against it and most of his laws were mum on the issue, which allowed for the status quo to prevail. He also nominated a Klansman to SCOTUS so there’s also that.
That being said, he does deserve credit for FEPC (which did attempt to combat discrimination, although it was limited in scope) and you should look into the Black Cabinet (although I'm inclined to credit Eleanor for this. Hell, she's the GOAT first lady ever when you look at the things she was pushing). His policies are what can be largely credited for African-Americans shifting away from the declining Party of Lincoln to one that housed the Dixiecrats who often our main political antagonists.
Anyway, I completely agree that a full accounting of FDR's, and other historical figures, actions should be alluded to when they are talked about. To what extent would depend on the nature of the conversation, otherwise, there would be a lot of non-sequiturs.