Never look at an OLED, then look at your TV, trust me. Avoid them like vampires do mirrors.Tv is immaculate!
ehh, you have to see the TV to understand...for the price its a stealNever look at an OLED, then look at your TV, trust me. Avoid them like vampires do mirrors.
Size wise but the picture quality is likely shyt.ehh, you have to see the TV to understand...for the price its a steal
Screen size makes bad pictures worse. A budget Chinese brand like Hisense or TCL will be exposed further when the screen is huge. I wouldn't be surprised if they artifact and error more, especially if they use the same weak processors they do in the smaller TVs.Picture quality isn't a replacement for image size. A 65" OLED isn't the same as a 100" LCD TV. If so, more people would notice just how crappy the image is when you pay $15 for a movie ticket.
Size is relative to distance, and when you increase resolution (1080p to 4k), you have to increase the display's size for a given distance so your eyes are able to resolve the details in the image. 100 inches is fine. At the typical sitting distance (8'-10') 4K on a 65" TV is too far to resolve the fine details. I use to own a high end AV store, and I had a 12 foot wide 2.35 aspect ratio screen, and due to the year (2009) there was only 1080p content. It would still look good today. If 100" were so large, no one would be able to stomach those 60 foot wide screens at the cinema. Cinemas are only displaying 4k content by the way. Yet, the large screen size offers a WOW factor than overshadows the other aspects of the image. It's a trade off and one that I typically recommend to potential TV buyers.Screen size makes bad pictures worse. A budget Chinese brand like Hisense or TCL will be exposed further when the screen is huge. I wouldn't be surprised if they artifact and error more, especially if they use the same weak processors they do in the smaller TVs.
Look at SD material upscaled to 1080 or 4K on a computer monitor or small (32" or less) TV, then the same material on a 65" or bigger set. The bigger set, no matter how good the upscaling, will look like an absolute mess.
Theater projection equipment and cheap Chinese chips are worlds apart. A huge screen has "wow factor" to the uninformed, but that requires a certain amount of ignorance hence "don't go look at OLEDs". You'll go home and look at your huge, mediocre at best picture likeSize is relative to distance, and when you increase resolution (1080p to 4k), you have to increase the display's size for a given distance so your eyes are able to resolve the details in the image. 100 inches is fine. At the typical sitting distance (8'-10') 4K on a 65" TV is too far to resolve the fine details. I use to own a high end AV store, and I had a 12 foot wide 2.35 aspect ratio screen, and due to the year (2009) there was only 1080p content. It would still look good today. If 100" were so large, no one would be able to stomach those 60 foot wide screens at the cinema. Cinemas are only displaying 4k content by the way. Yet, the large screen size offers a WOW factor than overshadows the other aspects of the image. It's a trade off and one that I typically recommend to potential TV buyers.
picture quality is decent given that its 4k with 1440 refresh rateSize wise but the picture quality is likely shyt.