this is some next level bu bu.
From what I understand the Northern Indians like Hindi's are Caucasian. I think they differ genetically from the darker Southern Indians like (Dravidian and Tamils) and even the language of Southern Indians differ also I believe. Most Indians however appear to be an admixture between the two groups.
He's HL's WOATWhy is everyone in this thread acting like this is some new information or discovery? Everyone, even historians, have known for a while India was made of a combination of groups but the biggest are the Dravidians (not Indo-European) who started the first civilization in the Indus River Valley and the Aryans who invaded 3,000 years or so ago gradually pushing the Dravidians south and forcing them into a caste system.
"Hindu Indians" are all Whites isn't true, the group is much more diverse, because of the admixture with Dravidians and some Asians. People in North India are more Aryan, South India more Dravidian.
The fancy genetic study you quoted just verifies what everyone knew from linguistic data. Western languages are called Indo-European because Hindi and some others are related to European languages more closely than Tamil or other Dravidian languages. Not sure if this is a troll thread or just a statement of the obvious.
ExodusNirvana said:He's HL's WOAT
This is an attempt to reboot his image
I'm just posting factsHe's HL's WOAT
This is an attempt to reboot his image
This guy knows what he is talking about.From what I understand the Northern Indians like Hindi's are Caucasian. I think they differ genetically from the darker Southern Indians like (Dravidian and Tamils) and even the language of Southern Indians differ also I believe. Most Indians however appear to be an admixture between the two groups.
very interesting..From research it seems like there are still some decrepencies on the different invasions pre modern historyThis guy knows what he is talking about.
Secondly, more knowledge will come out of "India" real soon as it is being more open to the past ?
A lot of scholars stay quiet or argue when it comes to the indo aryan invasion - for instance, it never happened in the first place.
People who live in India, think of them as different tribes.
oh yeah, fukk THE BRITISH EMPIRE !!!
This guy knows what he is talking about.
Secondly, more knowledge will come out of "India" real soon as it is being more open to the past ?
A lot of scholars stay quiet or argue when it comes to the indo aryan invasion - for instance, it never happened in the first place.
People who live in India, think of them as different tribes.
oh yeah, fukk THE BRITISH EMPIRE !!!
let's call it a day and say that life started in africavery interesting..From research it seems like there are still some dependencies on the different invasions pre modern history
let's call it a day and say that life started in africa
africa gave birth to 'india' by exploring that region