Hindu Indians are from the CACausus mountains

[hashmander]

this is some next level bu bu.

 

[DrBanneker]

Why is everyone in this thread acting like this is some new information or discovery? Everyone, even historians, have known for a while India was made of a combination of groups but the biggest are the Dravidians (not Indo-European) who started the first civilization in the Indus River Valley and the Aryans who invaded 3,000 years or so ago gradually pushing the Dravidians south and forcing them into a caste system.

"Hindu Indians" are all Whites isn't true, the group is much more diverse, because of the admixture with Dravidians and some Asians. People in North India are more Aryan, South India more Dravidian.

The fancy genetic study you quoted just verifies what everyone knew from linguistic data. Western languages are called Indo-European because Hindi and some others are related to European languages more closely than Tamil or other Dravidian languages. Not sure if this is a troll thread or just a statement of the obvious.

 

[Menelik II]

This is common knowledge breh.

 

[CACtain Planet]

From what I understand the Northern Indians like Hindi's are Caucasian. I think they differ genetically from the darker Southern Indians like (Dravidian and Tamils) and even the language of Southern Indians differ also I believe. Most Indians however appear to be an admixture between the two groups.

 

[ExodusNirvana]

Why is everyone in this thread acting like this is some new information or discovery? Everyone, even historians, have known for a while India was made of a combination of groups but the biggest are the Dravidians (not Indo-European) who started the first civilization in the Indus River Valley and the Aryans who invaded 3,000 years or so ago gradually pushing the Dravidians south and forcing them into a caste system.

"Hindu Indians" are all Whites isn't true, the group is much more diverse, because of the admixture with Dravidians and some Asians. People in North India are more Aryan, South India more Dravidian.

The fancy genetic study you quoted just verifies what everyone knew from linguistic data. Western languages are called Indo-European because Hindi and some others are related to European languages more closely than Tamil or other Dravidian languages. Not sure if this is a troll thread or just a statement of the obvious.

He's HL's WOAT

This is an attempt to reboot his image

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

He's HL's WOAT

This is an attempt to reboot his image

He doesn't need to 'reboot' his image. He needs a.....

Spoiler

 

[CACtain Planet]

He's HL's WOAT

This is an attempt to reboot his image

I'm just posting facts

 

[Saka]

Indians are a highly diverse population, the two main genetic markers being south indian and the eastern iranic, but depending on your caste you could have caucasian, ne euro, east asian or african admixture.

 

[GreenGrass]

From what I understand the Northern Indians like Hindi's are Caucasian. I think they differ genetically from the darker Southern Indians like (Dravidian and Tamils) and even the language of Southern Indians differ also I believe. Most Indians however appear to be an admixture between the two groups.

This guy knows what he is talking about.

Secondly, more knowledge will come out of "India" real soon as it is being more open to the past ?

A lot of scholars stay quiet or argue when it comes to the indo aryan invasion - for instance, it never happened in the first place.

People who live in India, think of them as different tribes.

oh yeah, fukk THE BRITISH EMPIRE !!!

 

[CACtain Planet]

This guy knows what he is talking about.

Secondly, more knowledge will come out of "India" real soon as it is being more open to the past ?

A lot of scholars stay quiet or argue when it comes to the indo aryan invasion - for instance, it never happened in the first place.

People who live in India, think of them as different tribes.

oh yeah, fukk THE BRITISH EMPIRE !!!

very interesting..From research it seems like there are still some decrepencies on the different invasions pre modern history

 

[Saka]

This guy knows what he is talking about.

Secondly, more knowledge will come out of "India" real soon as it is being more open to the past ?

A lot of scholars stay quiet or argue when it comes to the indo aryan invasion - for instance, it never happened in the first place.

People who live in India, think of them as different tribes.

oh yeah, fukk THE BRITISH EMPIRE !!!

Any conversation about genetic origins will have political consqeuences, since many people in India believe that the out of india theory is a remnant of British colonialism. However, modern science tells us that the subcontinent has always been a hotbed of activity with invasion after invasion, but the peculiar thing about the Indian civilization was the invaders over time were always assimilated into the society. The brahmin caste (the highest) itself usually has the highest rate of Caucasian ancestry in the subcontinent even in the south where the dravidian marker reigns supreme, so the dichotomy of the subcontinent as just Aryans and Dravidians is false, the difference is seen more among caste lines since India has been an endogamous society since at least antiquity.

 

[SirReginald]

Good thread

 

[CACtain Planet]

@blotter are you a Caucasian Hindi breh?

 

[GreenGrass]

very interesting..From research it seems like there are still some dependencies on the different invasions pre modern history

let's call it a day and say that life started in africa
africa gave birth to 'india' by exploring that region

 

[Saka]

let's call it a day and say that life started in africa
africa gave birth to 'india' by exploring that region

Well Africa is the origin of all humanity, since the purpose of these genetic markers and haplogroups is to see exactly how each group migrated out of africa thousands of years ago and the routes they took.