Hillary Clinton says Republicans are grooming Tulsi Gabbard for a 3rd party run (edit: not Russians)

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
25,525
Reputation
4,297
Daps
115,607
Reppin
Detroit
300,000 Dems voting for Bush vs. 95,000 people voting for Nader...

While Gore lost by 500+ votes (in reality he didn't lose, he won Florida)..

It sucks that they voted for Bush :yeshrug: but doesn't change the fact that Nader's run (where he only got 1.6% of the votes) proved that 3rd-party/Independent runs can swing an election.


And yeah, Gore won but the Supreme Court fukkery is a whole other discussion.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,421
Reputation
7,233
Daps
150,738
Reppin
CookoutGang
If Tulsi can't even get a consistent 3% polls in a Dem primary...

What makes anyone think her running as an independent is going to tilt things? She's also repeatedly said she isn't running outside of the Dem party.

I'm no fan of her but there's a certain amount of delusion and hysteria here.
How many low polling 3rd party candidates are needed to tilt the election? :francis:
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
42,689
Reputation
22,016
Daps
132,826
So all that Russia shyt is now uh nevermind? :mjlol:

Always follow the money. 1st it's ads. And we know that's already happening. Next it'll be donors.

I'm not going as far as to say she's a Russian asset, patsy, or proxy. I'm simply saying the Russians are backing her even though she didn't ask for it.

Honestly, I think she's a reverse Warren. Whereas Warren went from GOP to Dem. Tulsi is going from Dem to GOP. And Russia is taking full advantage of that.

Wake me up when she is officially a Republican. lol @ acting like you said something profound when it hasn't happened. :mjlol:



1st Step. :lolbron:
 
Top