Hillary Clinton says Republicans are grooming Tulsi Gabbard for a 3rd party run (edit: not Russians)
- Thread starter Dusty Bake Activate
- Start date
Why does she deserve a debt of gratitude for coming in and poisoning the well? Once ANYONE else said it and said it well then only Tulsi would have looked bad, Clinton pretty much chose the worst way and worst person to deliver the message.
Has he been in a coma since the mid-2000s?
c'mon bruh... Hillary redeemed herself and straight up defended the republic on this oneWhy does she deserve a debt of gratitude for coming in and poisoning the well? Once ANYONE else said it and said it well then only Tulsi would have looked bad, Clinton pretty much chose the worst way and worst person to deliver the message.
Has he been in a coma since the mid-2000s?
If Tulsi can't even get a consistent 3% polls in a Dem primary...
What makes anyone think her running as an independent is going to tilt things? She's also repeatedly said she isn't running outside of the Dem party.
I'm no fan of her but there's a certain amount of delusion and hysteria here.
What makes anyone think her running as an independent is going to tilt things? She's also repeatedly said she isn't running outside of the Dem party.
I'm no fan of her but there's a certain amount of delusion and hysteria here.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
So why do you think she’s not running for Congress re-election?
Why’d she just announce it, and why hasn’t she be raising money for it this whole time?
Why has she backed off M4A and is moving to the right on policy matters recently?
Why is she making up these dumb fake reasons to threaten a boycott of the DNC?
Why did she randomly say she doesn’t believe anyone is “deplorable” at the last debate?
Why did she decry identity politics unprompted in the debates
Why does she run to Tucker Carlson and Fox News every time she wants to bash Dems?
Why has she tried to play the role of hatchet woman in every Democratic debate
Why is she always an apologist for Trump on Russia now Ukraine/impeachment?
Why’d she just randomly have a meeting with Scaramucci and a bunch of wall street donors?
You probably think all of that is because she’s a principled independent thinker
- Because she is running for president.
- I don't know, I don't jump to conclusions like you do.
- I don't know, if backing off Medicare for all is a sign of something what's it mean for Liz or Kamala? Are they kissing up to Republicans to or just their donors?
- Are the reasons fake? I don't think so and she didn't boycott anyway.
- Strategically speaking it's dumb to ask for people's vote and call them deplorable. We see how well it worked for Hillary.
- Identity politics used outside of speaking about laws/legislation is rather useless and counter productive. I agree with her.
- He seems to give her an open platform. She gets on there whenever she wants. No one else on TV is offering a platform like that. If someone else is please let me know who they are.
- Oh she is the only one going after her opponents in the debates?! We know that's not true.
- Russiagate wasn't proven, that's what she said regarding Trump. And she now supports impeachment so what are you talking about?
- I don't know, and isn't Scaramucci not cool with Trump anymore and don't forget a prominent Democrat Wall Streeter/consultant was also there. Obama's golfing buddy according to article. I guess he is a Republican sympathizer to.
- Yeah I never called her that, but you like to assume a lot so not surprising.
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
Anybody running as an independent in a close race could swing the outcome regardless of polling, and Tulsi would most likely affect the race in a way that would benefit the GOP.
Even though I wasn't old enough to vote at the time I'm old enough to remember the 2000 election. If even a small percentage of Ralph Nader voters in Florida had voted for Al Gore who knows how differently the last 19 years would've played out.
How about all of those Dems that voted for BUSH in 2000 in Florida?
They're dumb, but not relevant to the topic at hand.
300,000 Dems voting for Bush vs. 95,000 people voting for Nader...
While Gore lost by 500+ votes (in reality he didn't lose, he won Florida)..
Greenwald famously claimed for years that there was no evidence that Putin hacked the democrats or the election, and you're relying on him to tell you who is reliable when it comes to evidence of Russians and hacking.
Repeatedly siding with Putin over Clinton has nothing to do with "war mongering". He's proven himself untrustworthy on the issue and you can't take his claims at face value.
You call yourself "intellect" and yet don't know who al-Sisi is?I don't know who the fukk Al-Sissi is but that is a horrible terrorist name LMAOOOOOOOOO
And you didn't answer my leading question. When did I side with war-mongerers? You claimed that I keep doing it. Put up or shut up.