Highest ranking, cute sista New Orleans cop: suspended for being on shift and working whole other job.

hatealot

Banned
Joined
Jan 22, 2017
Messages
13,656
Reputation
2,339
Daps
51,275
Mad at her for getting her paper.

Show me where she neglected one of her duties. Did she avoid any calls she was dispatched to while working NOPD? Was she not doing security detail while assigned to security detail? If not reinstate her and give her, her checks.
Just for argument sake. You don't find anything wrong with a peace officer or a civil servant who works in emergency services/Leo working another job while on the clock?

If you was her supervisor. How would you even write up her paperwork to submit to your superior if you was her commanding officer?
 

fact

Fukk you thought it was?
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,613
Reputation
6,034
Daps
59,376
Reppin
How you gonna ROFL with a hollow back?

(I literally know of multiple N.O.P.D officers that do this:francis:

5cdc60f9110a4.image.jpg

New Orleans Police Department Suspends Highest-Ranking Officer Following Theft Investigation​

police, officer, Sabrina, Richardson, investigation, demoted, suspended, New Orleans

On Thursday, The New Orleans Police Department suspended and demoted their high-ranking female officer Sabrina Richardson.

Richardson was the captain of the Third Police District, serving Gentilly, Mid-City, and Lakeview. She began serving a 120-day, unpaid suspension on October 23 and was permanently demoted from captain to lieutenant.

The NOPD investigated her earlier this year, citing timesheet irregularities. Timesheets and security detail paperwork showed Richardson clocking into work at the NOPD while taking off-duty detail shifts.
Detail shifts are legal opportunities for off-duty officers to perform uniformed security work while still under the badge.

Richardson was taking on detail shifts while on the clock for NOPD, double-dipping into both paychecks.
According to FOX 8, the investigation found “four years of payroll and off-duty detail records,” concluding that there were 26 instances of Richardson committing payroll fraud.

One example occurred in April last year when Richardson was paid $671 for 11 hours of work at Woldenberg Park. Before her shift ended, she was seen in the West Bank, on the clock with NOPD.
NOPD’s Skip Gallagher said, “This double-dipping issue, I just don’t get. You have a detail, and you’re working duty at the same time. This doesn’t make sense. And I think with officers who work a normal 40 hours a week, this just doesn’t happen.”

Friedman continued, “When the person responsible for this does this over and over again, which the police now admit occurred, and all they do is demote her, in a situation where she could conceivably be promoted again, for engaging in this kind of callous, clear violation, both of regulations and criminal law, to me, it’s pretty shocking that she wasn’t discharged.”


Before her role at the Third District, Richardson ironically worked for the NOPD’s Public Integrity Bureau. This Bureau typically investigates cases of police misconduct.


I read this article 5 times, just to be sure, I don’t care about the situation, don’t care about the job, don’t care about the individuals involved, I’m just curious;
In the bolder parts above, why did they quote one person whom was acknowledged, and then quote someone else entirely who was never introduced in the article? I know it doesn’t make that much of a difference, but who the fukk is “Friedman”?
 

Wildin

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
21,025
Reputation
6,457
Daps
64,471
Just for argument sake. You don't find anything wrong with a peace officer or a civil servant who works in emergency services/Leo working another job while on the clock?

If you was her supervisor. How would you even write up her paperwork to submit to your superior if you was her commanding officer?

It's only a problem if she neglected one of her duties for either of her jobs.

If she failed to respond to a call while actively working NOPD that is neglect. If she wasn't providing security for her role that she was being paid for then that is neglect.

She could get written up or fired for neglect without having two paying jobs. Notice how they haven't said "she failed to perform a duty" or "refused to do a task" they just said she was caught and because it's against department policy and 'falsified' payroll, by documenting she was working.
 

hatealot

Banned
Joined
Jan 22, 2017
Messages
13,656
Reputation
2,339
Daps
51,275
It's only a problem if she neglected one of her duties for either of her jobs.

If she failed to respond to a call while actively working NOPD that is neglect. If she wasn't providing security for her role that she was being paid for then that is neglect.

She could get written up or fired for neglect without having two paying jobs. Notice how they haven't said "she failed to perform a duty" or "refused to do a task" they just said she was caught and because it's against department policy and 'falsified' payroll, by documenting she was working.
We won't know her duties unless we see her employment agreement, which we won't see. This is when lawyers come in to interpret and apply a defense.
 

Sad Bunny

they/them
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
72,788
Reputation
2,103
Daps
163,038
If she was an honest person, she won’t have to worry about this. She got what she deserves.
 
Top