Higher Learning Worst Poster of the Year nominee thread

[Dusty Bake Activate]

This is coming from the biggest cry-baby of the SOHH years and now onto The Coli. Get off your high horse( aka donkey) and stop crying and create some decent topics...everything else is just

Why you so emotional? All I said I think you're the worst non-troll poster in HL...geez.

 

[thekingsmen]

Why you so emotional? All I said I think you're the worst non-troll poster in HL...geez.

Those who can't debate topics always use that cop-out.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

see the thingis i dont even see how you could take PoZs posts that much to heart. honestly like Kingpin he just makes me laugh with the libertarianism and 19th century teddy roosevelt head measuring . in fact i feel kinda sorry for him. hes one of the guys coming from an asian background thats clearly had issues fitting in with a culture/ race because of his diverse background. i can sympathize with him somewhat.

I can sympathize with him somewhat too...that's never been the issue. His mind is a sick, creepy, alien place. He's actually been mild here. You didn't read his posting history in KTL. If you did, you would want to him with a can of Raid.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

yeah kingsmen i pretty much did nominate you because i disagree with your worldview intensely. but i also picked you for your unwillingness to bend on ANY issue whatsoever. for example i disagree with newarkhiphop a lot as well but at least hes the kind of guy that will compromise. you already seem to think you have the answers to everything so....

 

[daze23]

demonic thread

 

[acri1]

I just noticed nobody's nominated Princepalityof Zeon

Dude was more of a perennial lock for worst poster in KTL then the Chicago Bulls in the 90's. I remember I made a worst poster poll once and he had over triple the votes of the person in 2nd place.

Yeah, but Mowgli outdoes him out of sheer quantity.

PoZ is an awful poster but at least only posts occasionally...Mowgli/co has like 8321 bad posts daily.

 

[Johnny Kilroy]

It's pretty sad to focus so much attention on honoring people in threads instead of creating debatable and intriguing topics. Instead we have a pathetic fest of who is good or bad based on what?.....Disagreeing.

Many of the people listed are named b/c the OP and some of the posters disagreed with them. I'm not here to kiss ass if I agree or disagree it's based on substance and the topic views given. There have been trolls who gotten better treatment than those who given different views from others posting.

Sadly it's pathetic and truly demonic friend.

Gotta cosign. If you disagree with someone that makes them a bad poster?
Mowgli is honestly one of the best posters in HL.

 

[Gus Money]

I had no idea all of those accounts belonged to Mowgli but it makes sense now

 

[thekingsmen]

yeah kingsmen i pretty much did nominate you because i disagree with your worldview intensely. but i also picked you for your unwillingness to bend on ANY issue whatsoever. for example i disagree with newarkhiphop a lot as well but at least hes the kind of guy that will compromise. you already seem to think you have the answers to everything so....

No it's called "Nothing else to do but to waste energy on figment characters on a forum thread". Get real G you must not sleep at night that I don't bend over kissing ass in threads. My views are my views for a reason just b/c you disagree with them doesn't mean you and VVD have to act like a bunch of Divas in the forums on who you like and dislike.

There are some great posters in these forums....better than me. There are some great debaters in these forums better than me. I don't have all the answers but I do feel strongly for my views and opinions and back them up with cites and sources every time which you seem to hate so much.


Maybe you need to focus on the New Year creating better topics and being a better poster than you and VVD acting like

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

I make good topics so you can fukk off.

I disagree about the quality of your sources, not on NEWS but on science. I think that your posting re: African conflict for example is very very good, but that you overextend yourself on various topics. I question the quality of your posting. You appear to make a lot of assumptions about things based upon anecdote, and when asked to present evidence you often do so from tinfoil hat sources. You are bringing up again some 'HL elite clique' or something that exists only in your head. And if you want to call someone a fakkit, you might as well just do so instead of dancing around your implications like a... well. You know already.

 

[thekingsmen]

I make good topics so you can fukk off.

I disagree about the quality of your sources, not on NEWS but on science. I think that your posting re: African conflict for example is very very good, but that you overextend yourself on various topics. I question the quality of your posting. You appear to make a lot of assumptions about things based upon anecdote, and when asked to present evidence you often do so from tinfoil hat sources. You are bringing up again some 'HL elite clique' or something that exists only in your head. And if you want to call someone a fakkit, you might as well just do so instead of dancing around your implications like a... well. You know already.

I don't see many of your threads...

According to you science is 1-D and cannot be questioned. To you topics can't be analyzed, discussed and viewed differently. Sounds to me G you might want to look in the mirror about this "HL Elite Clique" theory you have. You question my quality of posting....then do it...one by one show it stop beating around the bush. But since you are neither a scholar or book/movie review writer..I suggest you stay in your lane.

No one is calling you a fakkit. I would pointing directly how you see other posters with a "Diva" view. This is the whole reason you created the thread right is to express your Diva-ness.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

I make good topics so you can fukk off.

I disagree about the quality of your sources, not on NEWS but on science. I think that your posting re: African conflict for example is very very good, but that you overextend yourself on various topics. I question the quality of your posting. You appear to make a lot of assumptions about things based upon anecdote, and when asked to present evidence you often do so from tinfoil hat sources. You are bringing up again some 'HL elite clique' or something that exists only in your head. And if you want to call someone a fakkit, you might as well just do so instead of dancing around your implications like a... well. You know already.

Case in point, his comments about executive order 11110 in this thread.... http://www.the-coli.com/higher-lear...reserve-conspiracy-theories.html#.UN8pq6O3PFo

That wasn't just listening to bad sources. It was just poor logic. He didn't understand that the e. o.was part of a process to literally do the opposite of what he was claiming it was doing. Just atrocious.

 

[thekingsmen]

Case in point, his comments about executive order 11110 in this thread.... http://www.the-coli.com/higher-lear...reserve-conspiracy-theories.html#.UN8pq6O3PFo

That wasn't just listening to bad sources. It was just poor logic. He didn't understand that the e. o.was part of a process to literally do the opposite of what he was claiming it was doing. Just atrocious.

Bad sources...lol. This is coming from someone who got the sources from Pro-Fed websites.

Bias is a double-edge sword VVD....stop swinging. Btw....the E.O. 11110 was months after he initially signed the other one. You failed to address that and continue to use your excuse of it as your conversation piece.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

I don't see many of your threads...

According to you science is 1-D and cannot be questioned. To you topics can't be analyzed, discussed and viewed differently. Sounds to me G you might want to look in the mirror about this "HL Elite Clique" theory you have. You question my quality of posting....then do it...one by one show it stop beating around the bush. But since you are neither a scholar or book/movie review writer..I suggest you stay in your lane.

No one is calling you a fakkit. I would pointing directly how you see other posters with a "Diva" view. This is the whole reason you created the thread right is to express your Diva-ness.

I dont think science is 1-D. I only think that extraordinary claims that stray from scientific consensus require the necessary extraordinary evidence. In my opinion, you often fail to provide said evidence when challenging a stronger position. That is all. I am no scholar (my philosophical background is comparatively too weak). This thread isnt about debunking your posting one by one. That is for separate threads. This is just end of the year fukkery.

Its truly not that serious, and if you're so confident in the quality of your posting just ignore it like everyone else nominated in this thread has been. Hell you can even nominate me

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Bad sources...lol. This is coming from someone who got the sources from Pro-Fed websites.

My source for that particular tidbit of the convo was the e.o. itself, but whatever.

You failed to address that and continue to use your excuse of it as your conversation piece

Address what? I detailed how it was part of JFK's policy of effectively ending the Treasury's ability to issue silver certificates!...concisely and with cold, hard facts including JFK's own words, which you didn't even bother to read.

I can't make you smarter. I wish I could. That exchange was a picture perfect example of what's wrong here. Some people just cannot or will not debate with positions tethered to facts, then turn around and claim there's some kind of elitist cabal who wants to shut down dissenting opinion when they get called on their bullshyt.