Higher Learning Worst Poster of the Year Award

[Kritic]

you alright doob. don't worry about nuthin..

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Funny how they name nikkas who just body their arguments

 

[88m3]

Funny how they name nikkas who just body their arguments

Yup, usual suspects.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

come back to reality funk doc.

You're a lying piece of shyt poster that wouldn't know reality if it were stapled to your face and you were made to look in the mirror. No matter what you post, there's nothing you can say that will change the fact that you have NO evidence to support your position. You're just parroting nonsense because you don't know WTF you're talking about.......ever. You're wrong about EVERYTHING. You're a complete idiot with no integrity or intelligence. Your badgering won't work and repeating the same lies over and over again won't suddenly change them into the truth. Neither will posting giant walls-of-text devoid of logic or evidence.

No one cares about you or your opinions because you're stupid, a liar, and your opinions carry no weight whatsoever.

You are the absolute worst poster on this forum and your existence is a joke.

YOU LOSE.
​

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You're a lying piece of shyt poster that wouldn't know reality if it were stapled to your face and you were made to look in the mirror. No matter what you post, there's nothing you can say that will change the fact that you have NO evidence to support your position. You're just parroting nonsense because you don't know WTF you're talking about.......ever. You're wrong about EVERYTHING. You're a complete idiot with no integrity or intelligence. Your badgering won't work and repeating the same lies over and over again won't suddenly change them into the truth. Neither will posting giant walls-of-text devoid of logic or evidence.

No one cares about you or your opinions because you're stupid, a liar, and your opinions carry no weight whatsoever.

You are the absolute worst poster on this forum and your existence is a joke.

YOU LOSE.
​

I personally enjoy watching you fail to make cogent arguments.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I'm the only person here that has no problem w any poster -so it's fair.
On the scientific lecture circuit

@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

​

In 2013 the new Minister of Health Yael German has signed a new regulation setting water quality and not requiring fluoridation, that will take effect in the following year. She has insisted that it was better to provide fluoride in other ways to “target audiences” such as poor children, who were unlikely to brush their teeth regularly with fluoride toothpaste. “It must be known to you that fluoridation can cause harm to the health of the chronically ill and pregnant women,” German wrote in the letter.

OBJECTION: Fluoride passes through the placenta of the mother and poisons the developing fetus.

APPRAISAL: The St. Louis Medical Society, using data supplied by the Wisconsin Board of Health, studied the relationship of deaths and pregnant women and of babies before and after births to the amounts of fluorine in the water in their Wisconsin communities during two successive 5-year periods. The Society concluded that "The well recognized stresses of pregnancy and the sensitiveness of the developing fetus to changes in its environment could be expected to reflect the toxicity if any were produced by the water. Yet there is no important or consistent difference in the frequency of deaths at term (stillbirth), immediately after delivery (neonatal), during the first year of life (infant), or in the mothers themselves in the cities whose supplies of water contained from 0.03 ppm to 2.5 ppm of fluoride. There was no significant alteration of these patterns in the city of Sheboygan during the 5-year period following the raising of its concentration of fluoride from 0.03 ppm to 1.2 ppm."

The available evidence seems to indicate there is no toxic effect from drinking water fluoridated to physiologic concentrations of approximately 1.0 ppm, on either the mother or the child.

Funny how you put me on that list because I destroyed your objection then and now, yet you say you're being 'objective'. You believe nonsense and post it as fact, then, when I called you on your bullshyt, you caught feelings.

Maybe you should use those 35 links to research your posts before you hit <ENTER> to avoid posting bullshyt based on fear and scientific illiteracy.


​

 

[Blackking]

​

Funny how you put me on that list because I destroyed your objection then and now, yet you say you're being 'objective'. You believe nonsense and post it as fact, then, when I called you on your bullshyt, you caught feelings.

Maybe you should use those 35 links to research your posts before you hit <ENTER> to avoid posting bullshyt based on fear and scientific illiteracy.


​

, that's not why I put u on the list... I didn't even think of u when this thread came up. Like I said, ur a black (or brown , i guess) poster, who I don't know of to be a c00n- I have no beef w u.
and those links show discrepancies in the validity of the research...... you can't deny the facts, so u simply respond with more of the same

in any case....

One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the second world war, it was still a rarefied pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled, to 6m-7m active researchers on the latest reckoning, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to “publish or perish” has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs vie for every academic post. Nowadays verification (the replication of other people’s results) does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, dubious findings live on to mislead.

Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the cherry-picking of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has pepped up a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results “based on a gut feeling”. And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, the odds shorten that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a freak of the statistical noise. Such spurious correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, going senile or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.

Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. “Negative results” now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.

Its really not fair of you to make all these unhinged, aggressive, homoerotic, and extremely emotion post out of gotdamn now where..... And then not even tell your HL friends what's really bothering u.


Let it out.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I personally enjoy watching you fail to make cogent arguments.

You can't talk at all.
​

Jesus is predicated on the writings of an ex-con man (saul) who claims to have observed all this shyt and is at the crux of the entire story...not to mention that the OLDEST known writings can't be dated to any closer than 70 years after the supposed events took place.

1 Thessalonians was written in 52 CE.......19 years after the events and Paul's writings can be dated to within 1 year of the Crucifixion as per Bart Ehrman.

 

[Blackking]

hol up..... wait, Ur a Christian!?!?

I'm so confused.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

and those links show discrepancies in the validity of the research...... you can't deny the facts, so u simply respond with more of the same

Stop trying. The research has NEVER stopped since the 40's and if there WERE a discrepancy, it would have been discovered a long time and several thousand studies ago. Criticizing research doesn't invalidate it.

Sit your dumb-ass down trying to sound like you have an argument.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

hol up..... wait, Ur a Christian!?!?

I'm so confused.

We've already had this discussion. Your memory is as bad as your arguments. You're also annoying. I'm a theological noncognitivist and have been for over 2 decades.​

 

[88m3]

funkdoc backs his arguments up with facts from what I've seen.




@LeyeT on the other hand

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

funkdoc backs his arguments up with facts from what I've seen.




@LeyeT on the other hand

I don't agree with his views on theological matters, but son was A-1 in the fluoride and Noam Chomsky 9/11 threads.

 

[Blackking]

Stop trying. The research has NEVER stopped since the 40's and if there WERE a discrepancy, it would have been discovered a long time and several thousand studies ago. Criticizing research doesn't invalidate it.

Sit your dumb-ass down trying to sound like you have an argument.​

I've never personally tested the long term health affects of any chemical on a group of subjects like u have.

But I know about industries and how shyt works. I also know that I never made a case against fluoride... I just want 'the convo to remain objective... You post research that is possibly flawed and goes against known world leaders, international scientist, biologist, and some medical professionals that have held key positions. Based on that- I'm very surprised that you actually believe that your angry, aggressive, very long winded post towards @LeyeT - that make it seem like u wanna rape that nikka.......... Are appropriate. They are not.

You also r using appeal to authority. If a 20 year scientist not on gov payrole makes a case and backs it with research; I'm not going to automatically take the word over another human being just because that other human being did a different study that was published by blah blah magazine and he holds a position with the blah science commission.


Regardless of all that, do not reply to my post again if you're gonna disrespect ur HL 'friends' like this. Your basically insulting everyone by not revealing y ur acting like such a bytch.

 

[Blackking]

We've already had this discussion. Your memory is as bad as your arguments. You're also annoying. I'm a theological noncognitivist and have been for over 2 decades.​

Your right... I'd rather remember a way to help advance the world..
But you nikkas ALWAYS remind me of your lil quirks.


And correct me if I'm wrong ur the one with all the 'cute' lil phrases for God(or non God) and all the confused views on believing or not believing or thinking that there is nothing to not believe it.... or whatever the fukk it is..

You are admitting to be weak in comparison to atheist, believers, and agnostics.....

You admitted to being a weak minded bytch nikka for over 2 decades FYI IT IS a well known fact that only fakkits cling on to philosophical razors