Higher Learning Worst Poster of the Year Award

[OsO]

 

[88m3]

I
Eat a dikk fakkit. You got 15000 posts and still regarded as a weak poster. u a clown

Apparently I exist in your world. You seem real emotional.

 

[Blackking]

What's funny is... if this shyt was put to a vote some of the results wouldn't not reflect the shyt talking in here about these posters..

@Candor

Add the list and lets see

I think this is all the people I saw nominated.

@TLOL is back
@met
@LionofJudah
@88m3
@LeyeT
@Mephistopheles
@Blackking
@Mr. Somebody
@Kritic
@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
@Napoleon

 

[Mr. Somebody]

What's funny is... if this shyt was put to a vote some of the results wouldn't not reflect the shyt talking in here about these posters..

@Candor

Add the list and lets see

I think this is all the people I saw nominated.

@TLOL is back
@met
@LionofJudah
@88m3
@LeyeT
@Mephistopheles
@Blackking
@[B]Mr. Somebody[/B]
@Kritic
@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
@Napoleon

The list is obviously flawed.

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

Suggestion:

We should narrow it down to 4 or so, either through a primary or other selection, then vote.

 

[Blackking]

^^^^OK- There are two groups--- Don't even ask me how I split it, I have legit reasons and I'm prolly the only objective person here. pick 2 from each group.

@TLOL is back
@LionofJudah
@88m3
@Blackking
@LeyeT

@Mephistopheles
@Mr. Somebody
@Kritic
@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
@Napoleon

 

[Kritic]

judas escariot ass niccas.

 

[Fervid]

Perhaps, but at the end of the day, you're an idiot and he's not, and that's the most important thing.

If you were twice as smart as you are now, you'd still be stupid.
​

 

[Blackking]

judas escariot ass niccas.

shut up and stop being a sensitive nikka.

u on the list cuz so many people mentioned u.... if nikkas will ride for u they will vote for others, chill.

 

[acri1]

^^^^OK- There are two groups--- Don't even ask me how I split it, I have legit reasons and I'm prolly the only objective person here.

Gonna need the rationale behind the split before I can make an informed vote.



Still waiting on that Best Poster thread too.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Lol..I can think of 2 people who got multiple mentions that weren't named on the list off top...Slang and Dooby.

Not everybody's good at basic reading comprehension.

 

[Blackking]

Gonna need the rationale behind the split before I can make an informed vote.



Still waiting on that Best Poster thread too.

Don't matter, I'm the only person here that has no problem w any poster -so it's fair.

I don't really like twism, but he's also not on the list.

I guess we can add Dooby and Slang but I was under the impression they were a joke. Now I'll adjust the list

money and bytches..... or conspiracies/defense of jews.
@TLOL is back
@LionofJudah
@88m3
@Blackking
@LeyeT
@Mr. Somebody - wild card, lol.


On the scientific lecture circuit, broke, no bytches and/ or atheist.
@Mephistopheles
@Kritic
@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
@Napoleon
@Dooby
@Slang

 

[Blackking]

kritic goes on the top list .....

 

[ill]

Don't matter, I'm the only person here that has no problem w any poster -so it's fair.

I don't really like twism, but he's also not on the list.

I guess we can add Dooby and Slang but I was under the impression they were a joke. Now I'll adjust the list

money and bytches..... or conspiracies/defense of jews.
@TLOL is back
@LionofJudah
@88m3
@Blackking
@LeyeT
@Mr. Somebody - wild card, lol.


On the scientific lecture circuit, broke, no bytches and/ or atheist.
@Mephistopheles
@Kritic
@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
@Napoleon
@Dooby
@Slang

LionofJudah
Mr. Somebody

Dooby
Slang

 

[OsO]

I posted nothing but scientific peer-reviewed rebuttals gathered for over 60 years to EVERY objection raised in that thread, not my opinions. The scientists' conclusions I posted are INFINITELY more valid than your bullshyt attempt to downplay how badly your objection was destroyed along with that fakkit LeyeT's.
​

come back to reality funk doc.

you would post a scientific study as part of your rebuttal, but the study wouldn't back up your assertion.

example A - in the fluoride thread you posted a study that said 460 people got fluorosis in an area that had not received public water fluoridation. And you jumped to a conclusion and asserted that water fluoridation has NEVER contributed to any cases of fluorosis in the united states EVER, which is totally incorrect.

you also stood by your assertion DESPITE the fact the primary reason the government advocated for the lower fluoride levels in 2011 was to curb fluorosis. the government even stated this themselves. and the fact you dont understand this, something SO basic, means you shouldn't even be participating in this convo, for real.

and you post studies with no link.

and you post statistics with no link.

and you avoid answering direct questions.
and you just found out what water fluoridation was towards the end of the thread ()

now... are you really trying to deny these things happened?

because as a matter of fact you did it again a few days ago in the chomsky thread, and i called you out on it AGAIN. you posted a rebuttal that didnt address the main point:

example B:

you idiot.

this is the exact dumb shyt you were doing in the fluoride thread.. posting erroneous rebuttals and passing them off as factual.

please tell me which one of these statements from your previous post:

Fluoride is the only chemical added to water for the purpose of medical treatment.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies fluoride as a drug when used to prevent or mitigate disease (FDA 2000).

As a matter of basic logic, adding fluoride to water for the sole purpose of preventing tooth decay (a non-waterborne disease) is a form of medical treatment.

All other water treatment chemicals are added to improve the water’s quality or safety, which fluoride does not do.

​

is refuted by anything in the paragraph you posted as a response:

"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not have regulatory responsibility for public water supplies; that is the responsibility of the Environmental Protection Agency. To my knowledge FDA has made no statements regarding approving substances added to water - I don't know why we would since it is not our area of responsibility. With regard to your question about whether the Agency has made statements about the safety and efficacy of fluoridation, I would say only that we have approved fluoride containing products, dentifrices and mouthrinses, for the prevention of caries."

NADA.

and the worst part is you dont even know your rebuttals are wrong, even after i explain it to you. but at least the rest of HL gets to see what an intellectual midget you are.

im just dragging your dead body behind my carriage at this point lol... but keep digging that hole funkdoc


oh and...

You're a fool. Stopping water fluoridation would put more people at risk for developing fluorosis since the adjustment accomplished by fluoridation actually LOWERS the amount of naturally-occurring fluoride for the majority of the population receiving optimally-fluoridated community water.

your rebuttals dont hold up fam. ive just posted two examples and there are more in the fluoride thread.

and the fact you and the psuedo-skeptic coalition cant see that means you're either ignorant, dumb, or trolling on a level never seen before.