Facts, but that’s the city in NZ, Christ ChurchMuslims acknowledge Jesus. They just don't believe he is the son of God/messiah
Facts, but that’s the city in NZ, Christ ChurchMuslims acknowledge Jesus. They just don't believe he is the son of God/messiah
You were a cool poster. It’s on site now fakkit
:blaff:
Add The Wall to this list of frivolous expenditures while we wait for our check which could have been paid for already if not for these frivolous expenditures
Support racism dressed up in the form of a wall, brehs...
Most drugs enter through ports of call.
Most terrorists on nofly list enter through Canada.
And most "illegals" are here due to overstayed visas.
The wall is a fukking useless symbol of keeping America from becoming more brown.
You're smarter than this.
I debated even responding to this because I know you are trolling & aren't really looking for legit discourse on it...
But, there might be other, open minded people who may appreciate my opinion on it.
TL:DR version - Abrahamic religions believe in a god that created humans with free will; pure judgment really can only be fair if the impact of those choices are not actively redirected because of how sympathetic the potential victim might be. The world was created for humans NOT to be robots, but to be able to make choices that have unobstructed ramifications. This point combined with the belief in a universal judgment at some point whether in this life or the next, hopefully can correct & reward those who have gone through torment of all kinds.
Fully articulated point below:
Assuming, in the parameters of this argument, that a monotheistic God exists & the rules of this existence follow those basic tenets of the "Humans are given free-will, a god is interested & rooting for humanity to choose peace over chaos & there is sometype of afterlife justice/judgment."
Okay, a monotheistic god in the vain of Abrahamic Religions; we have to simply look at what free will is supposed to signify considering it is the major mechanic of which an ascription of goodness can be calculated from.
A god in the above context, for the most part, would create the pool table, arrange the pool balls & hand the pool sticks to humanity. If a stray bullet has been fired at a missed target and the trajectory is on a path towards a) a newborn baby or, in another scenario, b) a hardened, ruthless career criminal...
That was something done as a result of the free will of man. To somehow redirect this bullet from hitting the newborn baby in scenario a) because of how sympathetic we are for innocent children, but not misdirecting the bullet to avoid hitting the hardened criminal "bad guy", would be unfair as shyt to those WE are NOT sympathetic to.
Almost every action we make has a possibility of causing harm in various degrees, and if this world is truly a test of freewill and choice between right and wrong, such a god would have to allow the pool balls to travel and stop where they are hit otherwise the basic premise of freewill fails in what it's meant for.
You don't have to BELIEVE that but understand, whether religious or atheist or something in between, you really are just a real fukkboy for not understanding the ignorance of the "question" you just typed.
EDIT:
I'm just seeing this. If it is true that you were being completely genuine, hopefully the above can offer a start to a more mature dialogue but do you not see how the way you structured your question could 1) come off ignorant and 2) because of how insensitive it came across, it could literally prevent the type of honest and objective discussion that you claim to want.
Does that make any sense to you?
Facts, but that’s the city in NZ, Christ Church
Is the gunman dead?
She's dapping posts in defense of Candace Owens as well. Her ass needs to be bushed.
I debated even responding to this because I know you are trolling & aren't really looking for legit discourse on it...
But, there might be other, open minded people who may appreciate my opinion on it.
TL:DR version - Abrahamic religions believe in a god that created humans with free will; pure judgment really can only be fair if the impact of those choices are not actively redirected because of how sympathetic the potential victim might be. The world was created for humans NOT to be robots, but to be able to make choices that have unobstructed ramifications. This point combined with the belief in a universal judgment at some point whether in this life or the next, hopefully can correct & reward those who have gone through torment of all kinds.
Fully articulated point below:
Assuming, in the parameters of this argument, that a monotheistic God exists & the rules of this existence follow those basic tenets of the "Humans are given free-will, a god is interested & rooting for humanity to choose peace over chaos & there is sometype of afterlife justice/judgment."
Okay, a monotheistic god in the vain of Abrahamic Religions; we have to simply look at what free will is supposed to signify considering it is the major mechanic of which an ascription of goodness can be calculated from.
A god in the above context, for the most part, would create the pool table, arrange the pool balls & hand the pool sticks to humanity. If a stray bullet has been fired at a missed target and the trajectory is on a path towards a) a newborn baby or, in another scenario, b) a hardened, ruthless career criminal...
That was something done as a result of the free will of man. To somehow redirect this bullet from hitting the newborn baby in scenario a) because of how sympathetic we are for innocent children, but not misdirecting the bullet to avoid hitting the hardened criminal "bad guy", would be unfair as shyt to those WE are NOT sympathetic to.
Almost every action we make has a possibility of causing harm in various degrees, and if this world is truly a test of freewill and choice between right and wrong, such a god would have to allow the pool balls to travel and stop where they are hit otherwise the basic premise of freewill fails in what it's meant for.
You don't have to BELIEVE that but understand, whether religious or atheist or something in between, you really are just a real fukkboy for not understanding the ignorance of the "question" you just typed.
EDIT:
I'm just seeing this. If it is true that you were being completely genuine, hopefully the above can offer a start to a more mature dialogue but do you not see how the way you structured your question could 1) come off ignorant and 2) because of how insensitive it came across, it could literally prevent the type of honest and objective discussion that you claim to want.
Does that make any sense to you?
hence why you even have Blacks in that redpill mess, and when you call them out they defend that shyt like its the word of God.People like Joe Rogan and PewDiePie they're not insidious with anything. They come off rather likable and relatable. They're not angry. They make jokes and bullshyt. Then, when you call them on anything, they gaslight. "You're being too PC. Stop being a snowflake. Etc, etc." That is why they are dangerous. Even back when r/theredpill was still active, they covered their bigotry with improving yourself as a man and getting laid. You can't just be overt with the shyt because then you turn people off. But when you're covert with it you can convert people over time and get them on code.
fukk outta here clownI am atheist and his post was out of line.