GTA 6 should retail for $150. They'd make even more millions.

[Ezekiel 25:17]

This is the next step, Rockstar is one of the only devs that can get away with this. Hell, a lot of people buy the $150 version of NBA 2k, now imagine GTA 6.

A lot of folks would still buy this game just to play GTA 6 Online.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

$150 is too much, but i do agree GTA6 sized games could/should charge more than other games.


Maybe $100 standard and $150 for the full edition that entitles you to all updates, DLC, etc.

 

[RamsayBolton]

They don't really have a reason to risk trying it

Their formula is already working way better than everyone else when it comes to sales

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

$160 is too much, but i do agree GTA6 sized games could/should charge more than other games.

With all the free online content you get, no it's not too much. GTA 5 been out for 12 years, GTA 6 will be the same. $150 for 12 years of entertainment.

 

[Roid Jones]

First day cop

 

[In The Zone '98]

A version of it will most definitely be $149.99

 

[The Intergalactic Koala]

200 OP, and 500 for the limited edition, followed by a 29.99 subscription to GTA Land where you can be in a lobby of 30 raging whales hacking away, while the poor paying citizen have to withstand the fukkery

 

[MeachTheMonster]

With all the free online content you get, no it's not too much. GTA 5 been out for 12 years, GTA 6 will be the same. $150 for 12 years of entertainment.

Yeah, but the updates haven’t been free, people who’ve spent the last 12 playing the game have undoubtedly spent more money outside the initial investment.

Everybody isn’t going to be a 13 year gta gamer. I think there should be an option for them to just play the game, while the enthusiasts get a way to pay more up front for a discount to all the extra content over time.

 

[Rekkapryde]

A version of it will most definitely be $149.99

 

[JoelB]

nah

Because of microtransactions they can keep the price of the game relatively low. Bring in the maximum number of people in, then slowly rape their pockets for the next decade.

 

[The Phoenix]

The problem I see with this is if you go off the size and or scope of the game and decide to charge based on that, you already know what's going to happen. Any AAA game worth their salt is going to pad their content Ubisoft style and then upcharge. If GTA does it and gets away with it, the floodgates will open. And I don't have enough faith in people to stand on business and not purchase these games in protest. I've said it before in another thread, I feel like those games that are worth $100 have to stay at the regular price because the games that aren't worth $70 still charge $70. I think the best way is to do what they have been doing. Charge the base price, and then come up with other ways to extract money from those folks that want to spend it.

 

[T-K-G]

Why y'all sitting in here coming up with reasons to pay more? I could see if we knew the extra money was going to staff cuz they don't make shyt, but that ain't the case

Y'all would end up getting exploited then complain about it in the long run...

 

[Renegade47]

why do that when they are going to make billions from microtransactions?

this take is retarded and greedy?

 

[Marks]

The version that'll come with a steelbook and a million shark bucks is gonna cost $150 and it'll be the one all the GTAO heads get.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

it's about the residual income not the upfront price tag they would give that shyt away if it mean people would play another ten years buying subs and paying micro transaction fees.

Edit
all GTA Online DLC has been "free"