Google Bard signup (conversational AI)

NoMorePie

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
59,140
Reputation
10,567
Daps
212,850
Not currently supported in my country

WateryHopefulGermanshepherd-size_restricted.gif
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,846
Reputation
8,234
Daps
157,389
used google bard to summarize text that was transcribed from a youtube video.

I downloaded the audio and uploaded it to freesubtitles.ai to get it transcribed. i then asked google bard to summarize it.

Sure, here is a summary of the text:

Jared Ball is a radio host who discusses the recent interview of Killer Mike with Earn Your Leisure. He points out that Killer Mike is frequently invited to mainstream media platforms, and that this is problematic because it promotes his message of economic empowerment for Black people. Ball argues that Killer Mike does not seem to fully understand the Greenwood Bank project, which is a financial technology company, not a bank. He also points out that Killer Mike's comments about the future of banking are misleading, as they suggest that Greenwood Bank is a new and innovative way to bank, when in reality it is simply a fintech company that is taking advantage of the increasing popularity of online banking.

Here are some key points from the text:

* Killer Mike is a rapper and activist who is frequently invited to mainstream media platforms.
* Ball argues that this is problematic because it promotes Killer Mike's message of economic empowerment for Black people.
* Ball points out that Killer Mike does not seem to fully understand the Greenwood Bank project, which is a financial technology company, not a bank.
* Ball also points out that Killer Mike's comments about the future of banking are misleading, as they suggest that Greenwood Bank is a new and innovative way to bank, when in reality it is simply a fintech company that is taking advantage of the increasing popularity of online banking.

In the second clip, Killer Mike explains that he supports the Greenwood Bank Project because he believes it will be good for Black people. He cites the example of Andrew Young, who he says has a long history of bringing businesses and money into Atlanta, and that this has benefited the Black community.

However, Ball argues that this is a problematic view, as it promotes the idea of trickle-down economics, which is the belief that if the wealthy are given more money, they will eventually share it with the poor. He argues that this is a myth, and that the reality is that the wealthy will only share their money if they are forced to do so through taxes or other means.

Ball also points out that the Greenwood Bank Project is not a bank, but a fintech company. He argues that fintech companies are not necessarily beneficial to Black people, as they often charge high fees and interest rates, and that they can also be used to exploit Black people financially.

In the third clip, Ball discusses the role of Paul Judge, who is a co-founder of the Greenwood Bank Project. Ball argues that Judge is a wealthy businessman who is not interested in helping Black people, but is only interested in making money. He argues that Judge's involvement in the Greenwood Bank Project is a sign that the project is not truly beneficial to Black people.

Overall, Ball argues that the Greenwood Bank Project is not a good thing for Black people, as it promotes the idea of trickle-down economics, which is a myth, and that it is run by wealthy businessmen who are not interested in helping Black people.

The article describes the history of Greenwood Bank, a financial technology company that was founded in 2020 by Ryan Glover and Paul George. The company attracted a large following, in part due to the involvement of Killer Mike and Andrew Young, who are both prominent Black activists. However, the article raises concerns about the company's business model and its ability to actually help Black people.

The article notes that Glover and George had no experience in finance when they founded Greenwood Bank. They were both entrepreneurs who had previously founded successful startups in other industries. However, they were able to attract a large following by tapping into the growing interest in financial technology and by associating themselves with prominent Black activists.

The article also raises concerns about the company's business model. Greenwood Bank is a fintech company, which means that it uses technology to provide financial services. However, the company's business model is based on charging high fees to its customers. This has led to concerns that the company is not actually helping Black people, but is instead exploiting them financially.

The article concludes by noting that the future of Greenwood Bank is uncertain. The company is facing increasing competition from other fintech companies, and it is not clear whether it will be able to survive in the long run. However, the company's story is a reminder of the power of technology and the importance of Black representation in the business world.

 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,846
Reputation
8,234
Daps
157,389

Google’s $30-per-month “Duet” AI will craft awkward emails, images for you​

Google's new kitchen-sink AI branding is everything to everyone in every Workspace app.​

BENJ EDWARDS - 8/29/2023, 4:27 PM

A robot with many hands using digital devices at workplace
Enlarge
Getty Images / Benj Edwards
52WITH

On Tuesday, Google announced the launch of its Duet AI assistant across its Workspace apps, including Docs, Gmail, Drive, Slides, and more. First announced in May at Google I/O, Duet has been in testing for some time, but it is now available to paid Google Workspace business users (what Google calls its suite of cloud productivity apps) for $30 a month in addition to regular Workspace fees.

FURTHER READING​

Google at I/O 2023: We’ve been doing AI since before it was cool

Duet is not just one thing—instead, it's a blanket brand name for a multitude of different AI capabilities and probably should have been called "Google Kitchen Sink." It likely represents several distinct AI systems behind the scenes. For example, in Gmail, Duet can summarize a conversation thread across emails, use the content of an email to write a brief or draft an email based on a topic. In Docs, it can write content such as a customer proposal or a story. In Slides, it can generate custom visuals using an image synthesis model. In Sheets, it can help format existing spreadsheets or create a custom spreadsheet structure suited to a particular task, such as a project tracker.
An example of Google Duet in action (one of many), provided by Google.

An example of Google Duet in action (one of many), provided by Google.

Google

Some of Duet's applications feel like confusion in branding. In Google Meet, Google says that Duet AI can "ensure you look and sound your best with studio look, studio lighting, and studio sound," including "dynamic tiles" and "face detection"—functions that feel far removed from typical generative AI capabilities—as well as automatically translated captions. It can also reportedly capture notes and video, sending a summary to attendees in the meeting. In fact, using Duet's "attend for me" feature, Google says that "Duet AI will be able to join the meeting on your behalf" and send you a recap later.

In Google Chat, Duet reads everything that's going on in your conversations so that you can "ask questions about your content, get a summary of documents shared in a space, and catch up on missed conversations."
An example of Google Duet in action (one of many), provided by Google.

An example of Google Duet in action (one of many), provided by Google.

Google

Those are the marketing promises. So far, as spotted on social media, Duet in practice seems fairly mundane, like a mix of what we've seen with Google Bard and more complex versions of Google's existing autocomplete features. An author named Charlie Guo ran through Duet features in a helpful X thread, noting the AI model's awkward email compositions. "The writing is almost painfully formal," he says.

In Slides, a seventh-grade math teacher named Alice Keeler asked Google Duet to make a robot teacher in front of a chalkboard and posted it on X. The results are awkward and arguably unusable, full of telltale glitches found in image synthesis artwork from 2022. Sure, it's neat as a tech demo, but this is what a trillion-dollar company says is a production-ready tool today.

Of course, these capabilities can (and will) change over time as Google refines its offerings. Eventually, Duet may be absorbed into daily usage as if it weren't even there, much like Google's myriad other machine-learning features in its products.

AI everywhere, privacy nowhere?​

A promotional graphic for Google Duet.
Enlarge / A promotional graphic for Google Duet.

Google

In the AI-everywhere model of the world that Duet represents, it seems that everything you do will always be monitored, read, parsed, digested, and summarized through cloud-based AI models. While this could go well, if navigated properly, there's also a whole range of ways this could go wrong in the future, from AI models that spy on your activities and aggregate data in the background (which, let's face it, companies already do), to sentiment analysis in writing, photos, and documents that could potentially be co-opted to snitch on behalf of corporations and governments alike. Imagine an AI model reading your chats and realizing, "Hey, I noticed that you mentioned pirating a film in 2010. The MPA has been notified." Or maybe, outside of the US, "I see you supporting this illegitimate ethnic or political group," and suddenly you find yourself in prison.


Of course, Google has answers for these types of concerns:

"In Workspace, we’ve always held user privacy and security at the very core of what we do. With Duet AI, we continue that promise, and you can rest assured that your interactions with Duet AI are private to you. No other user will see your data and Google does not use your data to train our models without your permission. Building on these core commitments, we recently announced new capabilities to help prevent cyber threats, provide safer work with built-in zero trust controls, and better support our customers’ digital sovereignty and compliance needs."

Billions of people already use and trust Google Docs in the cloud without much incident, trusting the gentle paternalistic surveillance Google provides, despite sometimes getting locked out and losing access to their entire digital life's history, including photos, emails, and documents. So perhaps throwing generative AI into the mix won't make things that different.


Beyond that, large language models have been known to confabulate (make things up) and draw false conclusions from data. As The Verge notes, if a chatbot like Bard makes up a movie that doesn’t actually exist, it comes off as silly. "But," writes David Pierce, "if Duet misinterprets or invents your company’s sales numbers, you’re in big trouble."

FURTHER READING​

Why ChatGPT and Bing Chat are so good at making things up

People misinterpret data, lie, and misremember, too, but people are legally and morally culpable for their mistakes. A shown tendency toward automation bias—placing unwarranted trust in machine decisions—when AI models have been widely deployed makes AI-driven mistakes especially perilous. Decisions with no sound logic behind them can become formalized and make a person's life miserable until, hopefully, human oversight steps in. These are the murky waters Google (and other productivity AI providers, such as Microsoft) will have to navigate in the years ahead as it deploys these tools to billions of people.


So, Google's all-in bet on generative AI—embraced in panic in January as a response to ChatGPT—feels somewhat like a dicey proposition. Use Duet features and quite possibly save some time (we are not saying they will be useless), but you'll also need to double-check everything for accuracy. Otherwise, you'll risk filling your work with errors. Meanwhile, a machine intelligence of unknown capability and accuracy is reading everything you do.


And all this for a $30/month subscription on top of existing fees for Google Workspace users (about $12 per user for a Standard subscription). Meanwhile, Microsoft includes similar "Copilot" features with Standard Microsoft 365 accounts for $12.50 a month. However, Google is also offering a no-cost trial of Duet before subscribing.

This story was updated after publication to remove a reference to Alice Keeler as a Google-sponsored teacher.
 

Alvin

Superstar
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
20,083
Reputation
765
Daps
25,880
as of right now this shyt sucks, claude.ai is better (but is limited by how many answers you can get with the time) and chatgpt blows it out of the water (but you have to subscribe for better answers and is limited in the morning since everyone and their mother uses it.)
 
Top