Google aims to sell Glass to consumers this year for less than $1,500

[Rohiggidy]

 

[The Phoenix]

hands free right

So we paying 1500 for that?

By the way, now, I have read the article. The article where they start coppin pleas about how the tech isn't perfect, ya know....when you ask for directions but it brings up Wilt Chamberlains rookie stats. Yeah....that sh!t aint gonna be perfect when it drops at the end of the year either....but it will still be less than 1500.....it'll be $1499.

I won't lie, it looks cool, and I've longed for a HUD for some time, but c'mon....you are gonna side with these dudes for $1500 for some tech glasses B?

 

[Rohiggidy]

it wont cost $1500

 

[Kemyran]

didnt plasma tv cost a fortune when they first came out

And when did they reach mass adoption? When the fukking price came down. Now most cheap TV's have better pictures than those 10K sets from back in the day. AKA, you're getting better tech for less. What's the issue in waiting for that to happen?

 

[Red]

If they insist on having the frame so low why the fukk isn't half that frame transparent?

 

[nyknick]

Read what I said bruh. I don't need to read it to form an opinion about 1500 dollar GLASSES. No matter what the tech is, this is some sh!t that won't be as functional as a tablet for way less. You are asking consumers to reach into their pocket for a non-essential product.

I agree that $1500 is a lot but a thing like Glass could be 10 times more useful than a tablet which goes for $500-600.

I'm more concerned about the internet connection/tethering and battery life.

 

[The Phoenix]

I agree that $1500 is a lot but a thing like Glass could be 10 times more useful than a tablet which goes for $500-600.

I'm more concerned about the internet connection/tethering and battery life.

So we should pay $1500 for something that COULD be....possibly.....maybe be more useful?

Mr. Garrison would like to have a chat with you.

 

[Allah]

a few less eye witnesses on the streets

 

[nyknick]

So we should pay $1500 for something that COULD be....possibly.....maybe be more useful?

Mr. Garrison would like to have a chat with you.

Of course right now it's just a COULD. They are aiming to have it ready by the end of the year and there are still a lot of question about it.

I'm a rational man and thus do not stan a company or a brand, nor can I see the future, you on the other hand are too emotional to have a discussion with. Fact is that we do not even know if it will be released this year, what the exact price will be and everything it will be able to do.

 

[The Phoenix]

Ha. I'm emotional because I have an opinion on the matter? You saying I must be an Apple guy because I don't think $1500 bucks is a reasonable price for this technology? I don't understand your logic.

 

[Tom Foolery]

Wait, you guys are seriously considering walking around with this shyt on your face?

 

[Swagnificent]

I actually want this shyt to be expensive at first, I like feeling superior to common folks. It'll be a status symbol if they drop this year at $1500. Walking around with the glasses having everyone stare at you with jealously will be fun.

 

[Swagnificent]

Wait, you guys are seriously considering walking around with this shyt on your face?

why not?

It'll be expensive and a status symbol evermore than the iPhone when it dropped in 2007. Can't wait to walk around the streets in these knowing that most of you nikkas can't afford to be wearing 1500 like its nothing.

 

[Malta]

Might as well wear a "rock my chin and rob me" sign.

 

[duck]

garrus from m.e. would be proud