God's 12 Biggest d1ck Moves in the Old Testament

[Everythingg]

I responded to your question. I told you to forget it because you clearly don't understand the analogy.

In your analogy I could not honestly choose to believe you. What about my situation though? You told me to "forget it" because you saw that one CAN choose to believe something or choose not to. If you didnt see that, you would have answered my analogy that was built off yours.

Two can play at the "response" game. See?

I honestly dont know what you're referring to. See you claimed I was selfish. Someone quoted what I originally said and I ask: how do you get that I am selfish/arrogant from that post? Did you answer? Nope. Did he answer? Nah. That must be the part of the "response game" where one runs away right? Did I win the "response game"? lol

 

[noon]

In your analogy I could not honestly choose to believe you. What about my situation though? You told me to "forget it" because you saw that one CAN choose to believe something or choose not to. If you didnt see that, you would have answered my analogy that was built off yours.

The problem with your analogy is that you lacked any information or evidence. If there was any evidence of either option, you would be lead to believing one or the other. You wouldn't be able to choose. My analogy had some evidence. That's why you were unable to choose your belief. When it comes to religion there is evidence, or claims that mean evidence should be able to be found, that leads people to have more than just a yes/no guess. Therefore if you are convinced by what you think is sufficient evidence, or a lack of evidence to the claim, you are lead to a belief. It's not a choice, even if you try to convince yourself.

I honestly dont know what you're referring to. See you claimed I was selfish. Someone quoted what I originally said and I ask: how do you get that I am selfish/arrogant from that post? Did you answer? Nope. Did he answer? Nah. That must be the part of the "response game" where one runs away right? Did I win the "response game"? lol

You asked what linked your statement to the claim of you being selfish/arrogant. I said "probably this". And then you just talked about screenshots, instead of an answer. And when you were called out for not answering, you said did respond. But a response is not necessarily an answer. That's why yes, you win the "response game". The award is smug self-satisfaction. It's on your mantelpiece next to your DVD boxset of Bewitched.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

What created abiogenesis and evolution?

1. Abiogenesis isn't "created." Its the result of the confirmation and energy states of molecular arrangement. Get some lightning, an aqueous environment, and some geothermal vents, and you will probably get life.

2. Evoution isn't "created." Its what happens when creatures die off and ones better suited to specific environments are able to live on and pass their traits.

Where did I say God revealed everything in the bible?

you've said this before. stop lying.

Whats hard to understand about that?

you're using that psuedo-intellectual christian bullshyt to make it seem like "weary minds" are coming to christ.

fukk outta here.

I'm here to expose the holes in your stupid arguments.

That doesnt answer my question so I'll ask again. What created the social animal?

Abiogenesis and evolution.

You realize SOCIAL animals are ones that also care for their young, right?

Ants are as social as birds and monkeys.

You can keep up cant you my brethren? Lets speak of abiogenesis in particular. What have YOU SEEN IN YOUR LIFE PERSONALLY that displays this? Or have you gone off the word of others?

Evidence, idiot.

Miller-Urey experiments and many others since the.

Actually my "Creator" as you put it, has been demonstrated to exist. You just dont believe the accounts.

So prove the accounts and dead the debate.

Its not my fault if you fail to support your arguments.

There is a difference. If I see you driving and demand that you give me a ride you wouldnt help. Now if I asked nicely, you still may not help, but for sure you would be more willing to help when I asked nicely over when I demanded that you give me a ride.

How you ask doesn't matter if you get what you want in the end.

Asking god to do something and demanding god to do something work out the same for you anyways.

You're playing dumb I see lol

The irony

Nope. You continue doing it and eventually you will start to see things happening in your life that are out of your control. SHOW EFFORT on your part and God Almighty will in some way reveal Himself (Itself since God is neither male or female) to you. If you think that you can just kneel down, DEMAND God reveal Itself in a way that you are satisfied with, and if God doesnt, tis proves something, then I would say you are mistaken. VERY MUCH mistaken.

Yet your answer for those who are ardent believers is that they don't believe enough

Its a merry-go-round with you.

Even further, can you even prove what your deity is responsible for?

If it acts in the natural world, we should be able to measure the effects of your god.

I dont measure your faith. That is between you and God Almighty. Though if it s that easy for your faith to be shaken, then you dont a strong faith in God Almighty to begin with. And I've been in that situation as well.

Nice circular answer.

You have no problem speaking on behalf of "god" when its convenient, yet when pressed, the its some "private" issue you can't address.

And even further, I find it funny you don't have a strong faith in Vishnu either.

Yep. Other religions worship creation such as the sun, moon, stars, planets etc... The God of the Hebrews was/is none of these.

Nope.

Other religions worship their own gods with the same claims to the "universe" as your gods.

Be more specific as I do not adhere to religion.

Yeah, you do.

Just because it doesn't have a big name doesn't mean you didn't pull from religious concepts you were exposed (like monotheism and hebrew/abrahamic deities) to make your own brand of bullshyt.

Is that what I said?

You claim to be in possession of the authoritative view on the bible, do you not?

Not at all. Im just saying that I dont have to prove a thing to you about YOUR relationship (or lackthereof) in God. If you really wanted proof, you would search for it. And you dont search for it by asking people for their reasonings of why God exists and why God does not exist. Thats just getting man's opinion and basing your faith off that

You're asserting ALL of these objective statements, yet not taking the time or effect to back them up.

I'm asking you to prove your god exists, and you keep pretending like you're immune to defending it.

Read 1 Peter 3:15 and prepare your rebuttal.

Why?

Because otherwise, no one has any reason to engage you in any meaningful form of dialogue, nor can anyone take you seriously.

God knows but that doesnt mean that person knows does it?

So god knows he's about to turn a woman to salt anyways, cause god knows everything, but he still warns someone not to do soemthing, knowing that they're going to do it anyways and that he's already planning to turn her to salt?

So is god incapable of making decisions independent to what he already knows or is god lying about knowing everything?

 

[The Real]

10) Trying to Wrestle a Guy, Cheating, and Still Losing

And here's more evidence that God is a drunk maniac: Jacob was traveling with his two wives, his 11 kids, and all his earthly possessions and had sent them across a river. At that moment, a guy essentially leapt out of the bushes and started wrestling. It's God! They wrestle all night, and God cannot beat Jacob, so he uses his magic God powers to wrench Jacob's hip out of its socket. But Jacob still won't let him out of a headlock until God blesses him, because Jacob has figured out who this bizarre man is. God blesses him and wanders off, presumably to go get in a bar fight somewhere. (Genesis 32: 22-31)

WTF was God doing hiding in some bushes?

 

[the cac mamba]

Now how did you get this from what I typed?



I believe ALL are blessed in one way or another. But yes some do have it worse off than others.

you believe that you've been blessed by a supreme being. but looking around at the rest of the world, it would be evident that he gave you prioirty (youre life is good or whatever, some people cant even find clean water). i find it strange that 'god' is so inconsistent, or obviousoly gives a fukk less about half of the world

of course, they havent accepted jesus as their savior

 

[the cac mamba]

WTF was God doing hiding in some bushes?

 

[ProfessionallyTrill]

WTF was God doing hiding in some bushes?

 

[Everythingg]

you believe that you've been blessed by a supreme being. but looking around at the rest of the world, it would be evident that he gave you prioirty (youre life is good or whatever, some people cant even find clean water). i find it strange that 'god' is so inconsistent, or obviousoly gives a fukk less about half of the world

As I said, we are all blessed in some way. Nonetheless I do have it better than others. How does that make me arrogant or selfish as you and your friend have assumed?

Inconsistent? Or free will? That is the question lol

of course, they havent accepted jesus as their savior

Good thing Jesus didnt tell people to accept him as their savior huh? lol.

 

[Everythingg]

The problem with your analogy is that you lacked any information or evidence. If there was any evidence of either option, you would be lead to believing one or the other. You wouldn't be able to choose. My analogy had some evidence. That's why you were unable to choose your belief. When it comes to religion there is evidence, or claims that mean evidence should be able to be found, that leads people to have more than just a yes/no guess. Therefore if you are convinced by what you think is sufficient evidence, or a lack of evidence to the claim, you are lead to a belief. It's not a choice, even if you try to convince yourself.

Blah blah blah lol. I say that because you said people cannot CHOOSE to believe something. I gave you evidence of one being able to choose to believe something or choose not to believe something. Then you come with these unrelated words that do not address the CRUX of our conversation. Which was whether one could choose to believe something or not. And if I had asked you if there was evidence of the bible you would say no but now you're saying religion has evidence.

You asked what linked your statement to the claim of you being selfish/arrogant. I said "probably this". And then you just talked about screenshots, instead of an answer. And when you were called out for not answering, you said did respond. But a response is not necessarily an answer. That's why yes, you win the "response game". The award is smug self-satisfaction. It's on your mantelpiece next to your DVD boxset of Bewitched.

Yes that original quote is what you referred to me being selfish/arrogant. Did you explain how me saying I am personally thankful for what God has done in MY LIFE makes me arrogant or selfish? This is what I asked to cac mamba. "How does (insert what I said) lead to me being arrogant (or in your words selfish)?" Did you answer? Of course not. You screenshot my post (which was already addressed) and expect me to go over it again. This is AFTER you ran out the thread without answering my analogy lol. But yay I guess I win the "response game". Next up Im conquering LIFE.

 

[noon]

Blah blah blah lol. I say that because you said people cannot CHOOSE to believe something. I gave you evidence of one being able to choose to believe something or choose not to believe something. Then you come with these unrelated words that do not address the CRUX of our conversation. Which was whether one could choose to believe something or not. And if I had asked you if there was evidence of the bible you would say no but now you're saying religion has evidence.

What I said was "When it comes to religion there is evidence, or claims that mean evidence should be able to be found" those are the options.

Evidence or claims. Either/or. It's not my fault you have trouble with processing words.

 

[Everythingg]

1. Abiogenesis isn't "created." Its the result of the confirmation and energy states of molecular arrangement. Get some lightning, an aqueous environment, and some geothermal vents, and you will probably get life.

2. Evoution isn't "created." Its what happens when creatures die off and ones better suited to specific environments are able to live on and pass their traits.

you've said this before. stop lying.

1. What brought "abiogenesis" and "evolution" come to existence?

Where did I say that the bible revealed EVERYTHING? You have a quote?

you're using that psuedo-intellectual christian bullshyt to make it seem like "weary minds" are coming to christ.

Nope. Try again my brethren....

fukk outta here.

I'm here to expose the holes in your stupid arguments.

For what?

Abiogenesis and evolution.

You realize SOCIAL animals are ones that also care for their young, right?

Ants are as social as birds and monkeys.

Still not answering huh? Again what brought the social animals to existence? Abiogenesis and/or evolution you say? Well then what brought both of these to existence?

Evidence, idiot.

Miller-Urey experiments and many others since the.

And you have seen these experiments yourself or went off the word of someone else?

So prove the accounts and dead the debate.

Its not my fault if you fail to support your arguments.

You're right its not your fault if I fail to support my arguments. Just as it is not MY FAULT if you choose not to personally search for God

How you ask doesn't matter if you get what you want in the end.

Asking god to do something and demanding god to do something work out the same for you anyways.

Nope. But keep approaching God in that manner if thats what you personally believe will get Him to reveal Himself to you.

Me on the otherhand, will treat God Almighty the Creator of ALL Existence with alot more respect than that. Just as I would ask a human nicely if I wanted a favor instead of DEMANDING IT. The fact that you act as if theres no difference?

Yet your answer for those who are ardent believers is that they don't believe enough

Its a merry-go-round with you.

Even further, can you even prove what your deity is responsible for?

If it acts in the natural world, we should be able to measure the effects of your god.

What dont you get that I am not here to prove anything to you? I dont think you understand. I want you to believe in God but that is a personal decision. Im here to offer a choice. I offered the way that you can PERSONALLY see if God exists in your life. That isnt for my eyes to see but your own just as the experiences I have experienced, are for my eyes only.

Nice circular answer.

You have no problem speaking on behalf of "god" when its convenient, yet when pressed, the its some "private" issue you can't address.

Yep. I cant address your personal relationship (or lackthereof) with God. Thats something that you, God and the demons that may or may not () possess you would know.

And even further, I find it funny you don't have a strong faith in Vishnu either.

I dont believe in idols

Nope.

Other religions worship their own gods with the same claims to the "universe" as your gods.

Except their gods were created

Yeah, you do.

Just because it doesn't have a big name doesn't mean you didn't pull from religious concepts you were exposed (like monotheism and hebrew/abrahamic deities) to make your own brand of bullshyt.

Nope.....

You claim to be in possession of the authoritative view on the bible, do you not?

No. I claim to have read the bible and believed it. Nothing more, nothing less lol

You're asserting ALL of these objective statements, yet not taking the time or effect to back them up.

I'm asking you to prove your god exists, and you keep pretending like you're immune to defending it.

Read 1 Peter 3:15 and prepare your rebuttal.

Good thing Christ isnt my God or master so I guess someone that that verse applies to could give you a clearer answer in regards to that.

Oh and yes Im not going to prove anything to you. Either you're willing to work for it and do the work yourself, or you're not. Obviously you're not so theres that

Because otherwise, no one has any reason to engage you in any meaningful form of dialogue, nor can anyone take you seriously.

Again, I didnt yell "Hey napoleon! Im in this thread can you come talk to me PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAASEE?" You waltzed in here on your own account and started typing.

So god knows he's about to turn a woman to salt anyways, cause god knows everything, but he still warns someone not to do soemthing, knowing that they're going to do it anyways and that he's already planning to turn her to salt?

So is god incapable of making decisions independent to what he already knows or is god lying about knowing everything?

Maybe one should look at the story for the meaning and not look at the story as if they're God themself? Yea thats what I'll go with

 

[the cac mamba]

As I said, we are all blessed in some way. Nonetheless I do have it better than others. How does that make me arrogant or selfish as you and your friend have assumed?

Inconsistent? Or free will? That is the question lol




Good thing Jesus didnt tell people to accept him as their savior huh? lol.

it IS arrogant to claim that there's a god based on 0 tangible evidence. there are religious texts/novels that directly contradict every other text, and thats it.

as far as the jesus shyt, whatever breh. theres a billion people on this planet who 'know' thats the only way to achieve salvation.

 

[the cac mamba]

Except their gods were created

....there it is.

your posts are all pretty fukkin good, as far as trying to logically explain 'god' but THERE is your fukkin arrogance breh

 

[Everythingg]

What I said was "When it comes to religion there is evidence, or claims that mean evidence should be able to be found" those are the options.

Evidence or claims. Either/or. It's not my fault you have trouble with processing words.

Are you done now?

Do you want my attention? I ask because you really arent providing any insight into anything. Just coming in and trying to harp on one point to cause an argument.

You're still doing this. At the end of the day you said that people cannot choose to believe something. I pretty much presented the opposite where they COULD choose to believe something. You provided a situation where a person could NOT HONESTLY choose to believe something. But that wasnt the crux of the argument since you said that one COULD NOT choose to or choose not to believe something. So what you're doing STILL is waltzing in the thread, ignoring/avoiding, and harping on one point to argue off of. I mean I much rather have what I say responded to in full instead of picking and choosing so you dont have to say something you dont want to

 

[Everythingg]

it IS arrogant to claim that there's a god based on 0 tangible evidence. there are religious texts/novels that directly contradict every other text, and thats it.

Just as its arrogant to claim there is no God right? Or is this where you're hypocrisy seeps into the conversation?

as far as the jesus shyt, whatever breh. theres a billion people on this planet who 'know' thats the only way to achieve salvation.

Who cares? The point that matters is whether the one they claim is the only way to achieve salvation said what they are? The answer is no. Jesus (according to the gospels ) never said to accept his sacrifice, or accept him as their savior, to be saved. NOWHERE. Therefore, they are basing their beliefs off someone that isnt the rock of their faith (as they would call it)