George Takei apologizes for calling Clarence Thomas "a clown in blackface"
- Thread starter mrken12
- Start date
“The corollary of that principle is that human dignity cannot be taken away by the government. Slaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity) because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.”
That was his statement about his dissension on the gay marriage vote. Everything George said about him was true. It wasn't slanderous, cause Clarence been questionable
forever.
Him and his Wife.
It has been well known that he been kinda on that Larry Elder tip where you weren't sure if he was aware of how black people are perceived, as he plays by the
establishment rules. Calling a gay man a flaming F** attacks his lifestyle, and exposes your own bias. George attacked his character and how stupid Clarence sounded in the aftermath.
If you didn't know who he was, you would think he was an elderly white man based on his opinions. No, it was not appropriate for George to say, but he summed up what a lot of people
think about Clarence. Is he fighting for change, or is he just getting his seat at the table?
ralph lauren
Banned
Who are these ol nikkas?
I agree with part of your point, that we need more blacks in power condemning these c00ns, but I can't get down with people outside of our race getting involved in it. They should mind their own fukking business as far as I'm concerned.
100% truth.
Mr takei shouldnt have to even apologize. Clarence thomas is indeed a clown in black face.
Mr takei shouldnt have to even apologize. Clarence thomas is indeed a clown in black face.
for the most part, they do stay out of it. they only call out the bootlicking when spills over into their agenda.
Real N Quotes
East Is In The House OMG
Uncle Clarence“The corollary of that principle is that human dignity cannot be taken away by the government. Slaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity) because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.”
That was his statement about his dissension on the gay marriage vote. Everything George said about him was true. It wasn't slanderous, cause Clarence been questionable
forever.
Him and his Wife.
It has been well known that he been kinda on that Larry Elder tip where you weren't sure if he was aware of how black people are perceived, as he plays by the
establishment rules. Calling a gay man a flaming F** attacks his lifestyle, and exposes your own bias. George attacked his character and how stupid Clarence sounded in the aftermath.
If you didn't know who he was, you would think he was an elderly white man based on his opinions. No, it was not appropriate for George to say, but he summed up what a lot of people
think about Clarence. Is he fighting for change, or is he just getting his seat at the table?
First off I'm gonna say that nobody in this thread is defending Clarence's punk ass. My entire point is that it shouldn't be cool for non-black people to be comfortable enough to call a black person anything racial, considering that in George's case, if he was called something homophobic there would be more of an outrage.
You said that if I called George a fakkit I'd be attacking his lifestyle. If that's the case, then so is George calling Clarence a "clown in blackface". which is just another way of calling him a c00n.
Fine, I can agree with this. But when you are missing is that George fukking men does nothing to anyone.
Clarence is a JUDGE. EVERYTHING he does affects the country. That isn't a knock on his lifestyle, that is a fact. You can't weigh the two the same, even though I absolutely agree
with what you are saying. It was uncalled for, and that is why he is eating crow, but he didn't just pop up, grab a mic, and call him a clown in blackface. He obviously thought about
what to call him for a hot minute. Just calling gay people fags isn't the same as calling a man, virtually, a c00n for a LONG history of questionable behavior.
Again, yes, im agreeing he shouldn't have said it.
Yea, I think somewhere in this I got kinda lost
He absolutely shouldn't have said that shyt, cause people talk slick about blacks all the time and get away with it.
Part of me was just like "
shyt, someone had to say it." But of all people
at you uncle Tom's being ok with another race calling a black man a c00n or a black faced sambo. If it was Obama or some shyt yall would be on his dikk.
LogicFirst
Banned
Little gay Asian didn't personally or ethnically attack any of the other justices
Only blacks defend selloutsAny other race/ethnicity lets those sell out nikkas hang out to dry
