Karl said some flagrant shyt. In my opinion though you just don't wanna hear him say that..
Ya'll would of been fine if Michael Eric Dyson said it that's word to everything
Breh, talk to me, not yall.
--------------------------
All you know about my stance on any issue is how you've seen me post in THIS THREAD. As far as you're concerned, you have no basis to think I use "fatherless, "cac", or "This is yall black queens, huh?"
I'm not the trolls of this board. If you're willing to debate me on the merits of THIS thread, let's continue. Right now, you're clutching at straws, generalizing and letting your strong sports opinion cloud how ignorant George Karl's statement was and clouding the exact premise of this argument. It's almost like you didn't even read the fukking title of the thread.
I wouldn't be fine with anyone of apparent substance or notoriety saying some dumb shyt, Black, white or green. Matter of fact, in my sig, you can read an article I wrote detailing my desire for critical thinking in politics and social justice issues.
--------------------------
You exposed yourself here. You are taking the stance you're taking because of these factors:
1- You don't respect Melo as a ball player. (That's fair game)
2- You have a strong opinion on sports related matters. (That's fair game)
3- You believe the Coli breeds some ignorant opinion. (That's fair game)
4- You enter a discussion with a generalized view of each poster. (Wait, hold up, breh...)
5- You then read between the lines of a post to SEE evidence of what you hate about the Coli in a post you disagree with. (Nah, chill...)
6- You then co-opt the fukking thread to claim the discussion is on one specific facet(which gives you a strong stance) and ignore the overarching premise (which you have no leg to stand on).
FOH w/ that bullshyt, breh.
I don't know what other posters do and I don't know whether you do it, too. I know, based on how your replying to me and what you're posting.... that YOUR position is faulty as fukk.
Stick to the fukking point, which is fatherless as a description for an athlete's faults considering his mature accolades outside of this one basketball thing...defense.
To take a template from Iverson:
nikkas in here are talking about the audacity of this bytch ass George Karl and incendiary comments stigmatizing a successful family man on not having a father growing up because he came up on the AAU circuit and his lack of defense prevented Karl from winning a chip and you're talking about defense? You want this conversation to be about defense? Talking about fukkboys and you want to discuss...defense? Man...