Geno Smith is 8th in league in QBR

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
67,963
Reputation
10,404
Daps
229,412
He was dreadful in the second half and is the reason they lost

This game was his season in a nutshell. Great 1st half, terrible second half filled with turnovers
Yeah… Geno was the reason they lost, Not the 500 yards the defense gave up, nor were the penalties on the offensive line an issue.

it HAS to be geno. :mjlol:
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
67,963
Reputation
10,404
Daps
229,412
More terrible juelzing.

The whole entire second half of the season, he's been exactly what he's always been

He might be a stop gap for a desperate team with no options, but no team is going to commit to him as their guy with how awful he's been


So yeah, for 98% of his career, I've been right, and you had a month and a few week run that got you way too excited, and left you looking like an emotional idiot in the end
Now you’re going to argue with Seahawks fans that it was Geno’s fault that they lost today. :russ:

Pathetic.
 

Box Factory

hater
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
20,941
Reputation
-424
Daps
53,160
Reppin
#byrdgang
Yeah… Geno was the reason they lost, Not the 500 yards the defense gave up, nor were the penalties on the offensive line an issue.

it HAS to be geno. :mjlol:
It was a close game until his turnovers and inability to lead completely swung the game

You have an inability to give honest assessments of his play
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
67,963
Reputation
10,404
Daps
229,412
The fumble was crucial but the oline was combusting with missed assignments and penalties all second half. It was a fluky play. The season in a nutshell is the defense being ass and costing the hawks games

[Box]It wasnt them. It was Geno![/Factory]
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
I'm legit wondering whether there's more than 1 person in America who would write, "Geno was the reason they lost today."


Geno was the reason they were in the game today. Put up 23 points on the road against a team that had only given up 20+ three times all season. Accounted for 280 yards and a 66 QBR against a team that had been making quarterbacks look stupid all year.

Only two quarterbacks went into San Francisco and put up 20+ points this year. Pat Mahomes and Geno Smith. They were the ONLY ones. But giving up 41 points is somehow on him and not on the Seattle defense?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
He was dreadful in the second half and is the reason they lost

This game was his season in a nutshell. Great 1st half, terrible second half filled with turnovers
It was a close game until his turnovers and inability to lead completely swung the game

You have an inability to give honest assessments of his play


This is nonsense. Let's go drive-by-drive.



Drive #1: Gets the ball for the first time in the 2nd half and Seattle is already down 23-17 because the defense has let the 49ers score on 5 out of 6 drives already. Geno drives them down to the 7 (including having to convert a 3rd-and-12 after an O-line penalty) but then gets backed up to the 19 due to another stupid O-line penalty. Being forced by that into a tough 3rd-and-14 situation leads to the fumble that ends the drive.

Drive #2: Now down 31-17 because the defense has let 49ers score on 6 out of 7 drives. Starts the drive by completing a 15-yard pass, but then three consecutive O-line penalties fukk them over again and lead to an almost impossible to convert 3rd-and-22.

Drive #3: Now down 38-17 with 10 minutes left because the defense has let the 49ers score on 7 out of 8 drives. The game is over at this point, not just because they're down by 3 touchdowns well into the 4th but because the defense is NOT stopping them under any circumstances.


At that point in the second half, Geno was 9-13 for 95 yards and zero interceptions. And yet Seattle was still down 3 touchdowns. His fumble cost them 3 points, so it would still be 38-20 with 10 minutes left even with zero turnovers all game. Overall in the 2nd half he was 17-25 for 156 yards, 1 td and 1 int, against one of the best defenses in the league who got to tee up against 3rd-and-long situations all game because o-line penalties were rampant and the running game was mediocre. You put that on Geno and you're blind.



No way you put that loss on Geno. Take away the constant O-line penalties at the worst times and he isn't forced into impossible situations that lead to turnovers. Having to play desperate football led to turnovers, not whatever weird glitch in you brain sends everything into Geno hate.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
Geno had fewer picks this year than Mahomes, Rodgers, Allen, Ryan, Burrow, Dak, Cousins, or Carr. He had the same # of picks as Wilson despite almost 100 more throws. Overall he finished 11th in interception percentage out of 33 quarterbacks who played at least half the season.

Fewer turnovers than Allen, Ryan, Mills, Cousins, Lawrence, Rodgers, and Prescott. He had the same as Burrow, just 1 more than Carr and 2 more than Wilson, Brady, Fields, and Herbert despite playing more games and way more snaps than most of those guys. In fact, there were only 4 quarterbacks who started all 17 games and had fewer turnovers than Geno did - Goff, Mahomes, Herbert, and Brady. And half of those had just two fewer.


There's a reason he's playing in the Pro Bowl. There's a reason he finished # in QBR. There's a reason he led the Seahawks to the playoffs in what was supposed to be a throwaway rebuilding year and put up 23 points in a road playoff game in San Fran where they had only given up 20+ once all season. Just give him his due already and stop being so obstinate and prideful about it. When you said Geno wasn't an NFL quarterback, you were wrong. Full stop.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
67,963
Reputation
10,404
Daps
229,412
This is nonsense. Let's go drive-by-drive.



Drive #1: Gets the ball for the first time in the 2nd half and Seattle is already down 23-17 because the defense has let the 49ers score on 5 out of 6 drives already. Geno drives them down to the 7 (including having to convert a 3rd-and-12 after an O-line penalty) but then gets backed up to the 19 due to another stupid O-line penalty. Being forced by that into a tough 3rd-and-14 situation leads to the fumble that ends the drive.

Drive #2: Now down 31-17 because the defense has let 49ers score on 6 out of 7 drives. Starts the drive by completing a 15-yard pass, but then three consecutive O-line penalties fukk them over again and lead to an almost impossible to convert 3rd-and-22.

Drive #3: Now down 38-17 with 10 minutes left because the defense has let the 49ers score on 7 out of 8 drives. The game is over at this point, not just because they're down by 3 touchdowns well into the 4th but because the defense is NOT stopping them under any circumstances.


At that point in the second half, Geno was 9-13 for 95 yards and zero interceptions. And yet Seattle was still down 3 touchdowns. His fumble cost them 3 points, so it would still be 38-20 with 10 minutes left even with zero turnovers all game. Overall in the 2nd half he was 17-25 for 156 yards, 1 td and 1 int, against one of the best defenses in the league who got to tee up against 3rd-and-long situations all game because o-line penalties were rampant and the running game was mediocre. You put that on Geno and you're blind.



No way you put that loss on Geno. Take away the constant O-line penalties at the worst times and he isn't forced into impossible situations that lead to turnovers. Having to play desperate football led to turnovers, not whatever weird glitch in you brain sends everything into Geno hate.
Hes a garbage poster
 

Box Factory

hater
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
20,941
Reputation
-424
Daps
53,160
Reppin
#byrdgang
Geno had fewer picks this year than Mahomes, Rodgers, Allen, Ryan, Burrow, Dak, Cousins, or Carr. He had the same # of picks as Wilson despite almost 100 more throws. Overall he finished 11th in interception percentage out of 33 quarterbacks who played at least half the season.

Fewer turnovers than Allen, Ryan, Mills, Cousins, Lawrence, Rodgers, and Prescott. He had the same as Burrow, just 1 more than Carr and 2 more than Wilson, Brady, Fields, and Herbert despite playing more games and way more snaps than most of those guys. In fact, there were only 4 quarterbacks who started all 17 games and had fewer turnovers than Geno did - Goff, Mahomes, Herbert, and Brady. And half of those had just two fewer.


There's a reason he's playing in the Pro Bowl. There's a reason he finished # in QBR. There's a reason he led the Seahawks to the playoffs in what was supposed to be a throwaway rebuilding year and put up 23 points in a road playoff game in San Fran where they had only given up 20+ once all season. Just give him his due already and stop being so obstinate and prideful about it. When you said Geno wasn't an NFL quarterback, you were wrong. Full stop.
This is complete fluff posting from someone who doesn't watch the NFL, or didn't watch Geno play.

He didn't finish 1st in qbr. You're just lying with alot of your points

He was great the 1st half of the season, which I admitted at the time but said let's pump the brakes and see if he can keep it up

He couldn't and the wheels came off

Geno Smith Game by Game Stats and Performance | ESPN

He would have had 20-30 turnovers if you extend his play in the second half over a full season. He was awful down the stretch and cost the Seahawks several games

I also don't know that I ever said he doesn't belong in the NFL. I said he wasn't good 8 years ago, because he wasn't and his play late in the season is exactly what he showed early in his career. If I ever said he shouldn't be in the league, it was probably to troll NYC rebel because he's an obnoxious moron who posts like a petulant child or pyscho gf.

Geno always been extremely turnover prone and struggles with alot of basics. He has very poor awareness in the pocket.

He was schemed into a good 1st couple months, but didn't have the ability to keep it up. Which was expected

He had a great year for a career backup, but that's it. He's not anybody's franchise qb, and never will be
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
This is complete fluff posting from someone who doesn't watch the NFL, or didn't watch Geno play.

He didn't finish 1st in qbr. You're just lying with alot of your points

I never said he finished 1st in QBR, so who is the liar? :what:

Geno finished #6 in QBR, which is an incredible performance for someone who "shouldn't even be in the NFL".

I like how you had to make something up in order to challenge any of my points.




He was great the 1st half of the season, which I admitted at the time but said let's pump the brakes and see if he can keep it up

He couldn't and the wheels came off

Geno Smith Game by Game Stats and Performance | ESPN

It's like you're clueless about how sample size works. Every QB looks worse if you choose whatever was the worse half of the season. Geno Smith ended the year with 15 tds and 7 picks in his last 8 games. He had an above-average QBR in half of those games and 6 of his last 10. Even though the 2nd half of his season clearly wasn't as good as the 1st half, they still won 5 of their last 10 games and 3 of their last 6 and finished with a winning record to make the playoffs. Then he put up a great fight in his playoff game but was let down by the defense.



He would have had 20-30 turnovers if you extend his play in the second half over a full season. He was awful down the stretch and cost the Seahawks several games

This is disingenuous as fukk - he had 10 turnovers in the last 8 games so it's barely at 20 and you're just making up 30 out of nowhere. Josh Allen has 9 turnovers in his last 8 games. Carr had 9. Wilson had 9. Matt Ryan had 10, just like Geno. Dak had 13 turnovers in his last 8 games. I'm pretty sure they all belong in the NFL.

It's pretty incredible that a "turnover machine" managed to have just 11 picks and 4 fumbles against 31 touchdowns while playing for a bad team.
 

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
58,120
Reputation
3,967
Daps
174,604
I'm legit wondering whether there's more than 1 person in America who would write, "Geno was the reason they lost today."


Geno was the reason they were in the game today. Put up 23 points on the road against a team that had only given up 20+ three times all season. Accounted for 280 yards and a 66 QBR against a team that had been making quarterbacks look stupid all year.

Only two quarterbacks went into San Francisco and put up 20+ points this year. Pat Mahomes and Geno Smith. They were the ONLY ones. But giving up 41 points is somehow on him and not on the Seattle defense?

He was completely shut down in the 2nd half with 2 turnovers. Good 1st half though.
 

DripSzn

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
966
Reputation
-470
Daps
3,639
Reppin
New York
He was completely shut down in the 2nd half with 2 turnovers. Good 1st half though.
God forbid the top defense in league performs like they usually do and eventually shut down a QB. This is game is more on the Seahawks defense than it is on Geno.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
He was completely shut down in the 2nd half with 2 turnovers. Good 1st half though.


I already proved that was nonsense. He was 17-25 for 156 yards in the 2nd half and most of that came before his first int, which was with the Seahawks already down by 21 with just 10 minutes left.


#1: Drove the Seahawks 68 yards to the 7-yard line and looked like they were gonna score before a dumb o-line penalty knocked them back to 3rd-and-14

#2: Threw a 15-yard completion on the first play, then three straight o-line penalties created a 3rd-and-22

#3: pick

#4: 76-yard drive for a touchdown


How was he "completely shut down" if he had long drives on 2 out of 4 opportunities and the third drive ended because he had to start off with a 1st-and-25?

And that's with one of the best defenses in the league getting to load up against him cause a mediocre run game and too many penalties kept creating third-and-long situations. He had a 3rd-and-12, 3rd-and-14, and 3rd-and-22 on the first 2 drives of the 2nd half alone, and all three of them were created by a slew of penalties along with shytty predictable runs going nowhere on 1st down.
 

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
58,120
Reputation
3,967
Daps
174,604
Who didnt see this? Hes the reason they lost?

Seahawks were facing what defense?

his 2 turnovers didn’t help. He wasn’t the reason they lost but his play along with the rest of the team wilted in the 2nd half.
 
Top