Huellz Santana
Shocking
50 years? 
i woulda snitched so hard on my fellow hackers.
i woulda snitched so hard on my fellow hackers.
Genius Aaron Schwartz (founder of reddit) killed himself due to Obama's DOJ
- Thread starter Hiphoplives4eva
- Start date
Wow this is a real dikk move by the whitehouse, I find it hard to believe its a coincidence, shyt was getting serious
White House petitions now require 100K signatures for formal response | VentureBeat
because combined with the power of the internets, it's just too easy to get 25k+ people to sign any silly petition (like the one for a Death Star). blame the trolls
well let's get the signatures on the two petitions (or at least one) to 100k then.
What's wrong with the Death Star one, we were just having outchea
This actually makes it look like the charges are legit, and he knew what he was doing was illegal. In fact, I can say after reading the relevant law (if the law referenced in there is correct), that all of the charges were legit. Which confuses me as to why you would post up that image just now.
I still want to see the plea deals that he was offered that he and his lawyer refused. Is part 2 up yet?
Last edited by a moderator:
Type Username Here
Not a new member
The man stole free words!
Only thing that needs to be said.
Don't try to rationalize with future shytty lawyers who advocate the status quo of corruption.
This overzealous prosecution was direct retribution to Swartz's "anti-Government" activities.
Only thing that needs to be said.
Don't try to rationalize with future shytty lawyers who advocate the status quo of corruption.
This overzealous prosecution was direct retribution to Swartz's "anti-Government" activities.
Type Username Here
Not a new member
This is the same Department of Justice, under both Administrations, that sanctioned and refused to charge KNOWN torturers and wall street criminals.
You've become a psycho who shouts out accusations without proof and contradicts yourself. You weren't too happy when I and @daze23 said that the constitution should probably be redone in many ways, yet here you are crying about the LAW. Was, I the source of that law, no zerozero was. But that's what happens when you're perpetually angry, you can't see what's in front of you. You're forced to argue about unrelated tangents because you're unable to discuss an analyze the issue in front on you.
This "shytty lawyer" was the guy in here who said that he thought one of the interpretations of the law was wrong. The guy who is an Aaron apologist zerozero posts an article saying that I'M WRONG and you get amd at me
Somewhere in your training you never learned the cross-section between principle and rationality. You've slowly digressed into a lunatic with a short temper and obsession since October, leave the leftist and socialist arguments to @newarkhiphop he's better at it than you. You've ruined the honesty of 90% of every discussion you've participated in for about two months now. Insert your grandstanding response here. No, I won't be responding to you on this or anymore at all, you're a lost cause. A pity.
Last edited by a moderator:
Type Username Here
Not a new member
Once again, the future lawyer demonstrates that he doesn't understand the difference between a social contract and regular laws. The law expert doesn't understand the ideas of a binding agreement between the government and the populace. The law expert also advocated throwing the Constitution completely away, when we already have a process to change it.
The lawyer also doesn't understand that no one is saying the man was obviously guilty of certain crimes but those charges were asked to be dropped by the two parties involved. The lawyer also doesn't understand the absurdity of such a sentencing and overzealous prosecution. The lawyer also doesn't understand the utter hypocrisy of the DOJ's selective application of laws, especially when it benefits certain segments of the society.
Hopefully the lawyer will have a successful career as a DUI attorney and hopefully he won't get anywhere near any significant legal position, otherwise we might get another John Yoo.
The lawyer also doesn't understand that no one is saying the man was obviously guilty of certain crimes but those charges were asked to be dropped by the two parties involved. The lawyer also doesn't understand the absurdity of such a sentencing and overzealous prosecution. The lawyer also doesn't understand the utter hypocrisy of the DOJ's selective application of laws, especially when it benefits certain segments of the society.
Hopefully the lawyer will have a successful career as a DUI attorney and hopefully he won't get anywhere near any significant legal position, otherwise we might get another John Yoo.
Even though I'm pretty sure the majority of those charges were posturing and scare tactics, I'm also not completely convinced that this whole situation isn't deeper than it appears. However based on what we have to go on, I can say that there is a possibility that he would have had to do some time if found guilty but definitely not 50 yrs. I think he martyred himself to a degree but it has more to do with his mental state moreso than fear I believe. His death would have been more powerful if he were found guilty and maybe spoke on it from jail in detail before he died but instead we're left with a bunch of what ifs.
Type Username Here
Not a new member
He definitely had depression issues, as I stated earlier. He seriously contemplated suicide before when he thought he was getting fired, if I remember correctly.
I don't think he did it to be a martyr, and I definitely think he broke some laws (trespassing for one it seems).
Doesn't change the fact that the prosecution went way over the line, especially after the two original parties asked for the lesser charges to be dropped.
But if you think this man deserved ANY time in a Federal Prison, you are fukked up in the head. Plain and simple.
Magnus Warhol
Black + White = Love
once the government comes after you, its over. either you go to jail or pay your entire life savings defending your name. either way, the government is just as destructive as a terrorist.
