Take a stance, you know actually stand for something? Have a backbone? He's a federal worker and someone civil rights was just openly violated in his state
General Trump Administration F**kery Thread (2025-2029)
- Thread starter OfTheCross
- Start date
choc_cardigan
Squad
This nazi Germany type violations for rhe first amendment and the colis zionist shill blue dogs talking what about mitch McConnell
The weekly reminder that this is a shyt posting account that deserves no engagement whatsoever
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
So you have no idea what Schumer can materially do, you just want him to do -something-.
Schumer can’t do shyt but bytch and whine.
How about you put pressure on the journalist you take your orthodoxy from and ask them to put pressure on the people who are actually in power and making your life worse
Instead of rage baiting simple minded fukks like you to hate the democrats even more which makes the problem we’re in even worse
Schumer is one of Mahmoud Khalil elected leaders, he can do a lot by simply showing a backbone. Schumer and his party can single-handedly change the conversation around this illegal violation of Khalils civil rights
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
What can he do besides bytch and whine? What public opinion will that sway?
In a functioning democracy it’s the free press job to standup to tyranny; that’s why it’s enshrined in our constitution.
Your twitter thought leaders manipulate you for engagement
I’m man enough to take the L and apologize for cluttering up the board engaging him yesterday. My bad yall
*wakes up in the morning*
Mr klipperstein who we mad at today?
*should be noted this is before brushing teeth or doing anything else typical of starting one’s day*
You're absolutely right, our elected leaders should be ok with constitutional violations because they're not in power. Apologies, i thought we were concerned about threats to democracy
.
Last edited:
Bro responded to himselfYou're absolutely right, our elected leaders should be ok with constitutional violations because they're not in power. Apologies, i thought we were concerned about threats to democracy
Last edited:
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
You still haven’t said what Schumer should materially do.You're absolutely right, our elected leaders should be ok with constitutional violations because they're not in power. Apologies, i thought we were concerned about threats to democracy
You have no idea what democrats are doing behind the scenes.
Materially the only thing democrats can do is fight the law breaking in the courts which is what they’ve been doing.
Ask yourself why the journalist you’re following aren’t putting pressure on Republicans for violating the laws liberals put in place
What? Since when did "liberals" put in the first amendment
the cac mamba
Veteran
he's spent years telling us that electric cars are pieces of shyt, that can't be driven half a day without a charge
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Buddy a whole crisis actor in here huh
You know how those shift changes can be
