MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
70,380
Reputation
3,894
Daps
111,055
Reppin
Tha Land

Dems could drop “black” issues and it would be a net positive for their votes.

The whole point of protecting the vulnerable is that everyone is included.

If some people who otherwise would like to push progressive/liberal policy would throw away all that to attack such a small population of people, then you deserve chicken coups in your backyard and $30 tariff eggs :manny:
 

iceberg_is_on_fire

Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
22,698
Reputation
5,047
Daps
63,614
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,437
Reputation
3,856
Daps
111,346
Reppin
דעת



[/spoiler



Can people really not see the level of mental gymnastics at play here to make this a "thing"?

The narrative at its basic level is, Dems hate women because they want to protect the rights of a couple thousand males who want call themselves and live as women. Where is the outrage about Dems hating men then, because of the couple thousand women who want to be men? See how disingenuous this angle is?
 

Blackfyre

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2017
Messages
17,749
Reputation
3,243
Daps
68,379
Reppin
Earthrealm

NEW: RFK Jr.’s focus on vitamin A for measles is raising concerns among public health experts. "Relying on vitamin A instead of the vaccine is not only dangerous and ineffective, but it puts children at serious risk," says president of the AAP. w @FenitN



washingtonpost.com
RFK Jr.’s focus on vitamin A for measles worries health experts
The measles outbreak in Texas has sparked debate over the use of vitamin A, with some health experts warning it may not be effective.

9:22 AM · Mar 4, 2025
 

iceberg_is_on_fire

Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
22,698
Reputation
5,047
Daps
63,614
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park
Dems could drop “black” issues and it would be a net positive for their votes.

The whole point of protecting the vulnerable is that everyone is included.

If some people who otherwise would like to push progressive/liberal policy would throw away all that to attack such a small population of people, then you deserve chicken coups in your backyard and $30 tariff eggs :manny:
I hate that the trans fight is so public but everybody and everyone includes them too.

It is what it is.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
70,380
Reputation
3,894
Daps
111,055
Reppin
Tha Land
I hate that the trans fight is so public but everybody and everyone includes them too.

It is what it is.
It’s such a small issue it’s crazy.

Lots of youth sports are co-ed already.

Very few young girls are in a position athletically that encountering a trans athlete would effect their life in any way.

And there’s probably less than a few hundred trans girls that even want to play girls youth sports.

AND local leagues and municipals can set their own rules about who gets to participate. If you have a really competitive girls wrestling league then you can designate it to cis girls if you want.

AND as a parent you have the choice when/where/how your kid participates.

This whole fight at the federal level is a hate based culture war, not something that will ever effect 99% of americans.

Goes to show how easy it is to get people to behave irrationally with hate and fear. :smh:
 
Last edited:

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,804
Reputation
5,523
Daps
30,105
Those corpo-libertarians getting to experiment their loony policies for real give me hope that it will show the whole world the catastophic effects they will have on a country and its inequalities.

Hopefully the whole world get vaxxed against that ideology and we finally stop having politicians running on tax and welfare cuts. In a way, it's like the UK did with Brexit, it vaxxed all far right parties against euroskepticism.

Only issue is that innocents will get burned but at some point it has to backfire against the GOP.
 

Poetical Poltergeist

Precise and cold hearted
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
38,127
Reputation
5,827
Daps
123,942
Reppin
Mile in the Sky
I hate that the trans fight is so public but everybody and everyone includes them too.

It is what it is.
Thank the right for that. They talk about trans people more than anyone. It's a win/win for them because trans are an easy target and they know dems will run to defend them. It's an ace in the hole for Republicans.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
313,799
Reputation
-34,218
Daps
623,720
Reppin
The Deep State
Dems could drop “black” issues and it would be a net positive for their votes.

The whole point of protecting the vulnerable is that everyone is included.

If some people who otherwise would like to push progressive/liberal policy would throw away all that to attack such a small population of people, then you deserve chicken coups in your backyard and $30 tariff eggs :manny:
This isn’t a black issue and the comparison is disrespectful.

Green new tech is annoying and faulty, and if we dropped it and went back to plastics everyone would be happy. Is this your argument?

There is no such thing as transgenderism in the first place and these aren’t vulnerable groups. They want rights to do things you can’t even do!
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,342
Reputation
323
Daps
20,265
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Dems could drop “black” issues and it would be a net positive for their votes.

The whole point of protecting the vulnerable is that everyone is included.

If some people who otherwise would like to push progressive/liberal policy would throw away all that to attack such a small population of people, then you deserve chicken coups in your backyard and $30 tariff eggs :manny:
You’re also in theory oppressing another minority (women) for biological men who transitioned to be a woman in favor of orthodoxy.

It’s a losing issue.

Trans women should compete with men.

It’s not about femininity or masculinity, it’s about competition.

If a cis woman was good enough, they would also compete in men’s leagues, they don’t because they’re at an insurmountable biological disadvantage
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
313,799
Reputation
-34,218
Daps
623,720
Reppin
The Deep State
Can people really not see the level of mental gymnastics at play here to make this a "thing"?

The narrative at its basic level is, Dems hate women because they want to protect the rights of a couple thousand males who want call themselves and live as women. Where is the outrage about Dems hating men then, because of the couple thousand women who want to be men? See how disingenuous this angle is?
You proved the central point: Men can’t be women and women can’t be men in men’s space.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
313,799
Reputation
-34,218
Daps
623,720
Reppin
The Deep State
You’re also in theory oppressing another minority (women) for biological men who transitioned to be a woman in favor of orthodoxy.

It’s a losing issue.

Trans women should compete with men.

It’s not about femininity or masculinity, it’s about competition.

If a cis woman was good enough, they would also compete in men’s leagues.
Precisely. These trannies think it’s genocidal to be treated like their birth gender in a medical emergency or to be asked to compete in specific sports leagues.

fukk’em at this point.

They’re asking for more privileges than YOU have. :dahell:
 
Top