General Elon Musk Fukkery Thread

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,988
Reputation
7,936
Daps
149,431
go8wu0S.png

 

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,451
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,781
Reppin
NULL
What if the cost was $20 a year? Even if only 10% of current active users pay that's a billy every year or close to 25% of their annual revenue.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
3,170
Reputation
570
Daps
14,658
What if the cost was $20 a year? Even if only 10% of current active users pay that's a billy every year or close to 25% of their annual revenue.

People who don’t regularly post and don’t have a following don’t really have an incentive to pay for access. Way too many alternatives to deal w/ a paywall.

Also, when people start paying for stuff, it creates a contract. A lot of the lax moderation standards are gonna have to get tightened up.

I think I said a few months back, dude is literally creating a pay wall 4**** and hoping inertia keeps it going.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,687
Reputation
19,571
Daps
201,884
Reppin
the ether
What if the cost was $20 a year? Even if only 10% of current active users pay that's a billy every year or close to 25% of their annual revenue.


But what would happen to the rest of that annual revenue if 90% of their current active users didn't pay?


If he actually goes through with this, then he better do well enough on memberships to make most of his money that way, cause ad revenue is gonna crater.
 

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,451
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,781
Reppin
NULL
But what would happen to the rest of that annual revenue if 90% of their current active users didn't pay?


If he actually goes through with this, then he better do well enough on memberships to make most of his money that way, cause ad revenue is gonna crater.

True. Maybe they'll be able to view/like a tweet but not reply?

He's definitely making it up as he goes along.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
3,170
Reputation
570
Daps
14,658
True. Maybe they'll be able to view/like a tweet but not reply?

He's definitely making it up as he goes along.


At that point he’s already got that with Twitter blue. And I think that market is about capped out. I think the number of casuals he’d need to be ok paying for interactions on Twitter is far above anything he can get to make up for the reduced ad base.

I mean, we’ve had social media for 20+ years, if making a user base pay a fee was feasible on this scale, I think we would have seen it by now.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,988
Reputation
7,936
Daps
149,431
People who don’t regularly post and don’t have a following don’t really have an incentive to pay for access. Way too many alternatives to deal w/ a paywall.

Also, when people start paying for stuff, it creates a contract. A lot of the lax moderation standards are gonna have to get tightened up.

I think I said a few months back, dude is literally creating a pay wall 4**** and hoping inertia keeps it going.

visa and mastercard will have something to say about the pornography on the site too. same groups that pressure payment processors dealing with porn and piracy sites will target twitter too.
 
Last edited:

Silky Johnson

The Master Investbreh
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
1,906
Reputation
290
Daps
5,416
Reppin
Hatersbridge, BX


I thought people would have figured this out by now. Elmo wants his own WeChat so he can be an unelected overload of american democracy.

The problem with his Scooby-Doo ass plan is that americans don't gaf about his app outside of scammers & porn stars & he's too much of a goofy to snatch that that harlon crow/Charles Koch/Leonard leo level influence away from the current oligarchs.
 

Scientific Playa

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
13,930
Reputation
3,255
Daps
24,889
Reppin
Championships
I'm not overly pro union but am not against them either.
Dude makes a few valid points.
And NAFTA and those global free trade agreements started Nixon, Reagan and Bush Sr. weakened the US.

Fortune

UAW boss says workers shouldn’t accept lower wages so ‘greedy people like Elon Musk can build more rocket ships’​



Nicholas Gordon
Mon, September 18, 2023

The president of the auto workers union had harsh words for Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO and longtime nemesis of organized labor.

Workers in companies like Tesla “are scraping to get by so that greedy CEOs and greedy people like Elon Musk can build more rocket ships,” United Auto Workers president Shawn Fain said on CBS’s Face the Nation program Sunday.

In statements outlining their position, Ford Motor, General Motors and Stellantis—collectively known as the “Big Three”—have warned that the union’s demands would worsen the already-existing cost gap with other car companies with non-unionized workforces.

On Thursday, Ford said that meeting the UAW’s demands would double its labor costs, already “significantly higher than the labor costs of Tesla, Toyota and other foreign-owned automakers in the United States that utilize non-union-represented labor.”

Responding to these concerns, Fain claimed on CBS that labor costs made up just 5% of a vehicle’s cost. “[Automakers] could double our wages and not raise the price of the vehicles and still make billions in profits,” he said. The union president called wages at Tesla and other companies “pitiful.”

Representative Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), whose district covers part of the Detroit area, echoed these concerns on CBS. “Tesla does have a huge discrepancy in what they’re paying their employees. And most people in this country can’t afford a Tesla,” she said, referring to the car’s high price.

But Dingell suggested that a win for the UAW could help non-unionized workers too. “Almost all workers at auto plants benefit from where these negotiations go,” she said.

What are auto workers demanding?
The UAW started a targeted strike on Friday, walking out of three plants in Missouri, Ohio and Michigan. The union has suggested that starting small will allow most of its members to keep working, while preserving room for further escalation.

Negotiations between the union and the Big Three restarted over the weekend. The UAW said it had “reasonably productive discussions” with Ford on Saturday.

Ford said it was committed to reaching a deal with the union in a statement to Reuters on Saturday.

Still, the union and the automakers appear far apart. The UAW is currently asking for a mid-30% wage increase over the lifespan of the new contract, down from the initial demand for a 40% pay hike, but still far from what auto manufacturers have offered, at 20% at most.

The union is also asking for other benefits, including a shorter work week and, importantly, an expansion of benefits to plants working on electric vehicles. (Many of these factories are joint ventures with foreign companies, and not unionized).

The UAW’s president wants to recover lost ground after the 2008 auto bailout, when workers agreed to give up longstanding benefits to save auto companies from bankruptcy.

“The workers were unfairly blamed for everything that was wrong with those companies,” Fain said on Sunday, instead blaming “bad decisions on the parts of the companies that put us in that position.”

“We made all the sacrifices,” Fain argued, and “after a decade of massive profits, the workers have [gone] backwards.”

What about Tesla?
The UAW has long tried to organize workers at Tesla, which does not have a unionized workforce.

The union tried, and failed, to organize workers at the EV maker’s plant in Fremont, Calif. in 2018. The UAW then accused Tesla of illegally interfering in unionizing efforts, pointing to a tweet from CEO Elon Musk.

At the time, Musk asked why Tesla’s workers would “pay union dues and give up stock options for nothing” if they voted to join the UAW. The union alleged that workers could interpret the Tesla CEO’s tweet as a threat to take away stock options if they organized.

The National Labor Relations Board ordered Tesla to delete the tweet, as well as rehire a Tesla employee allegedly fired over organizing activity. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is now evaluating the order.

Musk has continued to needle the auto workers union on social media. “We pay more than the UAW btw, but performance expectations are also higher,” Musk posted to social media platform X, which he owns, on Thursday.

Yet industry data suggest that Tesla employees earn as much as a third less as their unionized counterparts. Tesla workers earn $45 an hour in wages and benefits, while those at UAW-represented plants can make up to $66 an hour, according to the Wall Street Journal citing industry data.

Tesla employees do receive stock options. Musk on Thursday claimed that “quite a few of our factory techs who work on the line have become millionaires over the years from company stock grants.”

Tesla did not immediately respond to an inquiry about pay at the company.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
 

that guy

Superstar
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
5,236
Reputation
548
Daps
17,045
What if the cost was $20 a year? Even if only 10% of current active users pay that's a billy every year or close to 25% of their annual revenue.
Remember he already got push back from charging for “twitter blue” and he would see a sizable hit on twitters already abismal advertisement revenue due to the massive drop off of traffic from users that would stop using the website if it’s not free

He’s going to keep looking for alternative revenue streams in order to delay the inevitable: bankruptcy.
 

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,451
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,781
Reppin
NULL
Remember he already got push back from charging for “twitter blue” and he would see a sizable hit on twitters already abismal advertisement revenue due to the massive drop off of traffic from users that would stop using the website if it’s not free

He’s going to keep looking for alternative revenue streams in order to delay the inevitable: bankruptcy.

At this point bankruptcy probably doesn't look so bad. Mf is going to pull a trump and write off the losses for the next 30 years.
 
Top