Gay Porn star expelled from HIGH SCHOOL once career exposed, liberals revolt!

[The Real]

Nearly every school district can suspend you for causing a disturbance at school.... or doing something that affects the climate at school.. They mainly expell people if it's huge enough.

There was this push and support to get this kid back in is the only reason that he is going back - Get real.

With no push he would be

I remember I was suspended for 4 days for simply having a certain color on.... because school officials aren't stupid.. they know things.

It's all in the interest of the students... legal privacy goes out the window when it directly affects the public life of the student, the school environment, and the way the school is viewed. Clearly this kid caused and uproar.

If this were a private school there would be zero discussion.

At the very least he can be banned from prom, sports, music - For sure... as those are not a right, but a privilege. I guarantee he will be banned from those..

You wore those colors at school. That's different. I disagree with that, too, but in that case, it has actual legal substance behind it. The school can't suspend you for wearing those colors outside of school or at home.

Celebrities cause massive uproars at the schools they attend, but they can't be suspended because their fame causes disruptions.

 

[thekingsmen]

Again, you're not speaking in terms of legal privacy. If an unauthorized sex tape of your sister hits the internet, it's public, yes, but it's not legally public. Legal public and private space is different from "I can see this" and "I can't see this." And relevant for this case, the two are separate. That's why the investigation sided with the student, said the suspension was wrong, and he's going back to school.

It's a website that he did porn on right? If it can be accessed without limitations than it's public. Your facebook isn't private, it's own by facebook and they own any videos and pictures you have and they can make it public. His videos can be shown. Where was it unauthorized? If this was a teacher the teacher would have been fired and most likely no longer able to serve as a teacher in the state.

 

[The Real]

It's a website that he did porn on right? If it can be accessed without limitations than it's public. Your facebook isn't private, it's own by facebook and they own any videos and pictures you have and they can make it public. His videos can be shown. Where was it unauthorized? If this was a teacher the teacher would have been fired and most likely no longer able to serve as a teacher in the state.

You're doing the same thing again and again. See my earlier post. Being "accessed without limitations" is not the definition of legally public. Like I said, see the investigation- they agree, and that's why this kid is going back to school.

 

[thekingsmen]

You're doing the same thing again and again. See my earlier post. Being "accessed without limitations" is not the definition of legally public. Like I said, see the investigation- they agree, and that's why this kid is going back to school.

I guess it's ok cause he can counter sue for the supposed discrimination against his "lifestyle". The teacher would be fired and the straight student would be expelled.

 

[NZA]

if you got your panties in bunch about the conservative vagina monologue lady getting let go, then you should be glad this gay pornstar got back into school

 

[Odyssey]

Social Consequences.

 

[tmonster]

hey roady, how you found this story?
:zfg:

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Public High School? Welp the ACLU is about to EAT

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

hey roady, how you found this story?
:zfg:

Hiphoplives4eva is HL's #1 source for all things sodomy. Maybe Utah will legalize gay marriage soon so he can settle down with Mowgli, Crakface, and Mr. Somebody.

 

[Kritic]

maybe just soft gay porn.

provide links we judge...

 

[Type Username Here]

Kid shouldn't be suspended for private sexual affairs.

Kid should be expelled for making threats (if true). He has the right to be gay or shoot porn, and people have the right to mock him. He doesn't have the right to make threats (if true).

 

[The Real]

Kid shouldn't be suspended for private sexual affairs.

Kid should be expelled for making threats (if true). He has the right to be gay or shoot porn, and people have the right to mock him. He doesn't have the right to make threats (if true).

This is how it is. ^ It seems the investigation found otherwise, though, and I'm not surprised. He was suspended just on grounds of his sexuality/porn career before, so it seems like they just invented a more legitimate reason to do it a second time.

 

[Hervis]

son out here fuccin dudes PROFES-ANALY, you know how much LEE-WAY he has to PERSUADE other dudes to start SUCCIN his d1ck or FUCCIN them in the ass just so they can say they fucced a porn star and gain the ABILITY to hang with the POPULAR FEMALES. you know the ANATOMY of HIGH SCHOOL

 

[thekingsmen]

@MyGawdThePower ....you must have your panties all tight up in a bunch you were scared to come in the thread, so you pulled the move and removed points from me. If you don't like the opinion....too bad. You didn't even participate in this thread. Straight up bytch. The story was probably about you.

 

[ill]

Kid shouldn't be suspended for private sexual affairs.

Kid should be expelled for making threats (if true). He has the right to be gay or shoot porn, and people have the right to mock him. He doesn't have the right to make threats (if true).

Thats how I see it too. In regards to @thekingsmen point about teachers doing the same thing - Teachers have a duty to their students and to the integrity of the school system. I don't think its an accurate comparison. With that said, a little bit off topic but, the special ed teacher from Mass shouldn't have been fired. Her special needs 2nd graders and the rest of the elementary school have no clue wtf she's doing either way. If she was in high school, it would be a different story + her pics weren't really porn.