Gas attack in Syria kills dozens: US forces launch strike on Shayrat Airbase in Homs (4+ dead)

MVike28

right around the ACC
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
24,609
Reputation
4,604
Daps
101,949
Reppin
T.O.
Why would Assad attack his own people? Especially when he's about to win the conflict.

He wouldn't.
Give the benefit of the doubt to a regime that murdered hundreds of thousands of their citizens brehs.

This talking point is popular among all of you. It's a joke.
 

MVike28

right around the ACC
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
24,609
Reputation
4,604
Daps
101,949
Reppin
T.O.
Yes I'm sure Assad gives a fukk about the people of rebel-held Idlib. He has a long track record of compassion with citizens who oppose him.
breh the absolute ignorance being displayed in here.

TLR posters punching above their weight. Brehs never even heard of Syria until 2 years ago and trying to sum up the conflict in 2-3 lame repetitive talking points.
 

The Odum of Ala Igbo

Hail Biafra!
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
17,969
Reputation
2,960
Daps
52,728
Reppin
The Republic of Biafra
Can you make a point without equivocation? When did I argue that the US has never lied or that I supported the Iraq war? The distance people will go to avoid acknowledging that the Syrian regime is definitely capable of chemical attacks is incredible. Same with avoiding acknoweldging that Russia is the major power playing the greatest role in this conflict both military and as propagandist.

Perhaps you impliclity support action yourself considering you can't seem to make an argument against strikes that doesn't rely on conspiracy Assad.

I actually think the strikes are symbolic and won't change much in big picture. But I'm definitely not shedding tears for the destruction of some MIGs or claiming the obvious moral position is to support the glorious Syrian regime against the treacherous AQ-America conspiracy.

I never denied that Assad undertook chemical attacks against civilians :umad:

However, you refuse to acknowledge Western propaganda efforts to pull the US into a war in Syria - at your own peril too.

Moreover, America is funding/supporting Al Qaeda in Syria
In Syria, militias armed by the Pentagon fight those armed by the CIA
Arming Syrian rebels: Where the US went wrong - BBC News

Stop being a lackey
 

thatrapsfan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,840
Reputation
1,869
Daps
54,078
Reppin
NULL
I never denied that Assad undertook chemical attacks against civilians :umad:

However, you refuse to acknowledge Western propaganda efforts to pull the US into a war in Syria - at your own peril too.

Moreover, America is funding/supporting Al Qaeda in Syria
In Syria, militias armed by the Pentagon fight those armed by the CIA
Arming Syrian rebels: Where the US went wrong - BBC News

Stop being a lackey

You've speculated the chemical attack could've come from rebels multiple times throughout this thread.

This is more loose yarns being tied together to fit into a grand narrative. The U.S. tried to arm vetted rebels and the program was largely a failure. They were overpowered and never gained much credibility. Post-2013, the U.S.'s policy was by and large focused on fighting ISIS while dividing spheres of influence with Russia and avoiding direct confrontation with the regime. You cannot seriously believe the U.S.'s main policy intent was regime change under Obama? The CIA programs budget and support pales in comparison to hundreds of billions spent on ISIS airstrikes, arming YPG, and putting special forces on the ground. The U.S. definitively did not want to get pulled into a war with Assad under Obama. Whether this changes now who knows. I suspect that it wont and the big picture is fixed.

The sad thing is you cant make a principled argument for non-intervention that acknowledges: the Assad Regimes nature, that international intervention is already happening and focused on ISIS as well as propping up Syrian regime, and that the U.S. has largely been trying its best to avoid confrontation with the Russia or the regime.
 

thatrapsfan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,840
Reputation
1,869
Daps
54,078
Reppin
NULL
2,978

Minimum Civilians Estimated Killed by Coalition in Syria

Airwars – Home

Civilian death toll ( by coalitions reporting) of the Anti-ISIS campaign. People are implicitly OK with this since there is no outrage or protests over the anti-ISIS campaign.

Yet a single strike hitting an airport hangar has the moral arbiters riled up. It seems even they accept the use of force and civilian death tolls in international interventions is OK, as long as the government in question is left alone :beli:
 
Top