From global warming to fluoride: why do people deny science?

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,348
Reputation
4,236
Daps
71,837
a couple things...

1) given what you said about sodium fluoride and its effects on the human body, doesn't it seem the potential cons outweigh the potential pros?

we apply fluoride protection to our teeth everyday by brushing them, we dont need the "extra" fluoride in the water, so to me it doesn't seem like it's worth the health risk. ESPECIALLY when the majority of the fluoride in question is being SWALLOWED (which you stated was most harmful to humans) as opposed to being applied externally to the teeth.

imo extra protection against cavities is not a valuable enough benefit to offset the negative health risks. sodium fluoride is used to kill insects so i think there are better options if we want to add things to our water supply, and the bottom line is there are too many unknowns to even chance it.

2) also when thinking about dosage you've come into contact with, think about the fact we've had multiple daily exposures, everyday of our lives to fluoridated water, both internally and externally. when we drink from the faucet, when we cook our food, when we wash our hands, when we take a shower... we are absorbing the sodium fluoride multiple times daily in multiple ways...and who is tracking that? who is monitoring people's fluoride intake over time?

also it's about more than just suffering from fluoride intake, its about extreme fluoride intake in conjunction with all the other toxins we are exposed to on a daily basis. toxins from the air, toxins in the food, toxins caused physiologically by our negative thoughts and emotions... all of these combine to take a toll on the body. why add the toxicity of fluoridated water to the scenario? especially when the health benefits are so minimal and the potential health risks so great? it defies common sense.

3) if your best response is:



you have pretty low expectations for our government.

4) if fluoridated water is not recommended for infants and pregnant women because its dangerous, that alone is enough of a reason for me to resist water fluoridation.

it's not safe for my pregnant wife and child...but it helps protect against cavities :comeon:

this simple fact alone should merit fluoride not being in our water supply, and i think the fact some people dont see this truth as self evident is totally insane.



yea, it's called toothpaste.



:heh:

Just to be clear, I don't know enough about the chemistry behind the idea of water fluorination and how ot helps protect teeth to really give a personal opinion on it. So I'm not advocating or condemning anything.

First fluoride ions are the concern here, so they don't necessarily have to come from sodium fluoride. It could be any compound that releases free fluorine ions into the water. Fluorine by itself to my knowledge isn't too bad....you'll find fluorine in many medicinal and household compounds. So my post was really just giving background based on my knowledge of fluorine from when I work with it.

I have faith in the EPA controlling levels. They are a top notch agency overseeing a huge area and servicing almost 400 million Americans and consult other countries. The government is actually damn good at it. The EPA is one agency that taxes are well spent on. It is impossible to remove toxins from every water source so you monitor levels and if ever it becomes unsafe for intake you take measures to make sure it doesn't get used. Just my personal opinion. You don't have to trust them as much as I do. As far as fluorinated water, your body as long as its working properly can deal with micro concentrations of toxins in water supplies. Concern comes when large concentrations are taken in at once, as your body will be overwhelmed and the toxins can't be metabolized fast enough. Women that are pregnant and small children don't have the mechanisms we do working at peak efficiency so its best to keep them away from many things that might compromise them more. I hope I brought some more insight to it. Not trying to sway you, its well within your right to be concerned.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,151
Reputation
14,319
Daps
190,893
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
Western European nations have WAY better dental care and prevention then here. Everyone there gets regular dental checkups and preventative visits when they're children.

Until we get a humane 21st century system of dental care here, let the fluoride flow.

Yea but a lot of people in UK have fukked up teeth.

Either way I heard I can get laser eye surgery for free out there. :whew:
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,486
Daps
26,223
I wish we nationalized the whole lot.


My point was China doesn't really regulate any of the stuff you ticked off. I know which I prefer.

What about Cuba... you would prefer our system over theirs?
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,042
Reputation
1,147
Daps
12,072
Reppin
Harlem
Just to be clear, I don't know enough about the chemistry behind the idea of water fluorination and how ot helps protect teeth to really give a personal opinion on it. So I'm not advocating or condemning anything.

First fluoride ions are the concern here, so they don't necessarily have to come from sodium fluoride. It could be any compound that releases free fluorine ions into the water. Fluorine by itself to my knowledge isn't too bad....you'll find fluorine in many medicinal and household compounds. So my post was really just giving background based on my knowledge of fluorine from when I work with it.

I have faith in the EPA controlling levels. They are a top notch agency overseeing a huge area and servicing almost 400 million Americans and consult other countries. The government is actually damn good at it. The EPA is one agency that taxes are well spent on. It is impossible to remove toxins from every water source so you monitor levels and if ever it becomes unsafe for intake you take measures to make sure it doesn't get used. Just my personal opinion. You don't have to trust them as much as I do. As far as fluorinated water, your body as long as its working properly can deal with micro concentrations of toxins in water supplies. Concern comes when large concentrations are taken in at once, as your body will be overwhelmed and the toxins can't be metabolized fast enough. Women that are pregnant and small children don't have the mechanisms we do working at peak efficiency so its best to keep them away from many things that might compromise them more. I hope I brought some more insight to it. Not trying to sway you, its well within your right to be concerned.

1) what makes you trust the EPA and the US govt to regulate this scenario when they have failed to properly regulate so many other scenarios in regards to public health and public safety?

2) i am very interested in your bolded statement. i wonder what is the tangible difference between ingesting large amounts of toxins in the water supply at one time, and ingesting small amounts of toxins consistently over a long amount of time? in any case, it doesnt make sense to add something to the public water supply on the basis that "our bodies can get metabolize the toxins so they aren't harmful," especially when we have no idea how may toxins our body is processing on a moment-to-moment basis. if there is ANY doubt, then why even add the sodium fluoride at all?

3) i know now what must be done
 
Top