First Look: Sony 84-inch 4K TV

GoldenGlove

๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜‘๐Ÿ˜ถ๐Ÿ˜‘๐Ÿ˜
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
59,525
Reputation
5,725
Daps
140,145
Would you recommend an Aquos over a Viera HDTV?

Research on your own.

Go over to avsforums and look into the TV model that you're looking into.

I have an Aquos, a Bravia and a Viera, they all are fine IMO. You just have to look into them on your own, if you see some glaring issues that people continue to bring up then take note... but a lot of times people nitpick and bytch about a lot of things that a lot of people won't even care about.
 

the artist known az

Hail the victors
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
40,592
Reputation
6,150
Daps
96,023
Reppin
TSC FA' Life #ByrdGang
Research on your own.

Go over to avsforums and look into the TV model that you're looking into.

I have an Aquos, a Bravia and a Viera, they all are fine IMO. You just have to look into them on your own, if you see some glaring issues that people continue to bring up then take note... but a lot of times people nitpick and bytch about a lot of things that a lot of people won't even care about.

Appreciate it breh
 

satam55

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
45,347
Reputation
5,068
Daps
89,370
Reppin
DFW Metroplex
btw, we are about to start the 4K era??!??!?!

cable ain't even broadcasting content in 1080p yet.

Really? Never!?

Yes, Never!!! It can be mainstream as a digital movie theater format. But as home entertainment format, it won't ever be mainstream. The reason is that no average person is going to have a display large enough to actually benefit from the 4K image. Even a 55"-70" display isn't going to show much, if any difference from 4K, 2K, or 1080p. Most people have screens 42" or smaller. Even those who have 50"-60" screens will see little to know difference. Hardcore videophiles (i.e.: a serious minority with money to burn and dedicated video projector-based home theater rooms) will be the only ones to come even close to benefitting from 4K.
 
Top