Ferguson police execute an unarmed 17 yr old boy (Update: Ferguson police chief to resign 3/19)
- Thread starter Canon
- Start date
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
the truth is coming out but no crowds
this mcColluh mothefukker deserves to be burn alive put out and burn him again repeatedly.
Hope the supreme court rule in that juror favor. No reason for them to have to keep quiet, dumb ass law. People need to use common sense.
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
Pacni99a12
All Star
Anybody seen this bullshyt? New video of "Michael Brown". You'd think he was the one who got away with murder the way they're trying to destroy his name.
Don't even look like the nikka
U no we all look a like , cacs i swear
Don't even look like the nikka
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
EXCLUSIVE: Now Ferguson prosecutor is accused of lying about evidence in ANOTHER grand jury which cleared police of killing two unarmed black men
Misleading? The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of an unnamed juror who wants to speak about the investigation but would be in violation of Missouri law by doing so. The juror also claims prosecutor Bob McCulloch's office favored witnesses who supported Wilson's version of events
The prosecutor at the center of the Ferguson scandal has been accused of lying about evidence presented to grand jurors in an earlier case in which police shot dead two unarmed black men.
The explosive allegation is made in a court case that threatens to lift the lid on the final secrets of the investigation into the shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown last summer.
The unarmed black teen was shot dead by Ferguson cop Darren Wilson, 29, on 9 August. Violent protests raged in the immediate aftermath.
Witness accounts that Brown had raised his hands and begged ‘Don’t shoot’ were later discredited but ‘Hands Up Don’t Shoot’ remained the banner under which protesters marched in November, when public fury reignited with the grand jury’s failure to indict Wilson on any charges.
Now, State Prosecutor Bob McCulloch has been accused of using the secrecy of the grand jury to ‘cover up’ racism and inequity; of withholding evidence through ‘significant’ redactions in the public evidence dump; of falsely suggesting that the grand jury was unified in its final verdict and of lying before – 15 years ago - under uncannily similar circumstances.
The allegations are made by Anthony Rothert, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri in the case of Grand Juror Doe v Robert P McCulloch - an attempt by one of the grand jurors to be allowed to speak openly about what happened in the hearing.
Mr Rothert said, ‘Bob McCulloch has put out his narrative about what the grand jurors thought and it’s not accurate. He’s said he has released all the evidence but there are significant redactions and context missing.’
And it is not the first time Mr McCulloch has been accused of being less than truthful.
Mr Rothert continued, ‘Any government official should be questioned,but there is true reason to be skeptical when Bob McCulloch says he is being fully transparent. He made that claim once before, in the investigation of a June 12, 2000, police shooting.
‘He wasn’t telling the truth. Years later, evidence that he was withholding came out.’
On 12 June 2000 two police officers shot dead two unarmed black men in Berkeley, Missouri – within walking distance of the Ferguson street on which Michael Brown was gunned down.
The incident became infamous locally as the Jack in the Box shootings, named after the fast food chain in whose parking lot the killings took place.
Victim Earl Murray, 36, was a small time drug dealer. His friend Ronald Beasley, also 36, was a married father of three who worked in an auto repair store and just happened to be in Murray’s car when officers sprayed it with 21 bullets.
What followed – public outrage, official reluctance to name the officers, a grand jury’s failure to indict and, significantly, the central roles played by Bob McCulloch and Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson – is strikingly similar to the events that have unfolded in Ferguson over the past five months.
Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...black-men.html
Misleading? The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of an unnamed juror who wants to speak about the investigation but would be in violation of Missouri law by doing so. The juror also claims prosecutor Bob McCulloch's office favored witnesses who supported Wilson's version of events
The prosecutor at the center of the Ferguson scandal has been accused of lying about evidence presented to grand jurors in an earlier case in which police shot dead two unarmed black men.
The explosive allegation is made in a court case that threatens to lift the lid on the final secrets of the investigation into the shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown last summer.
The unarmed black teen was shot dead by Ferguson cop Darren Wilson, 29, on 9 August. Violent protests raged in the immediate aftermath.
Witness accounts that Brown had raised his hands and begged ‘Don’t shoot’ were later discredited but ‘Hands Up Don’t Shoot’ remained the banner under which protesters marched in November, when public fury reignited with the grand jury’s failure to indict Wilson on any charges.
Now, State Prosecutor Bob McCulloch has been accused of using the secrecy of the grand jury to ‘cover up’ racism and inequity; of withholding evidence through ‘significant’ redactions in the public evidence dump; of falsely suggesting that the grand jury was unified in its final verdict and of lying before – 15 years ago - under uncannily similar circumstances.
The allegations are made by Anthony Rothert, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri in the case of Grand Juror Doe v Robert P McCulloch - an attempt by one of the grand jurors to be allowed to speak openly about what happened in the hearing.
Mr Rothert said, ‘Bob McCulloch has put out his narrative about what the grand jurors thought and it’s not accurate. He’s said he has released all the evidence but there are significant redactions and context missing.’
And it is not the first time Mr McCulloch has been accused of being less than truthful.
Mr Rothert continued, ‘Any government official should be questioned,but there is true reason to be skeptical when Bob McCulloch says he is being fully transparent. He made that claim once before, in the investigation of a June 12, 2000, police shooting.
‘He wasn’t telling the truth. Years later, evidence that he was withholding came out.’
On 12 June 2000 two police officers shot dead two unarmed black men in Berkeley, Missouri – within walking distance of the Ferguson street on which Michael Brown was gunned down.
The incident became infamous locally as the Jack in the Box shootings, named after the fast food chain in whose parking lot the killings took place.
Victim Earl Murray, 36, was a small time drug dealer. His friend Ronald Beasley, also 36, was a married father of three who worked in an auto repair store and just happened to be in Murray’s car when officers sprayed it with 21 bullets.
What followed – public outrage, official reluctance to name the officers, a grand jury’s failure to indict and, significantly, the central roles played by Bob McCulloch and Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson – is strikingly similar to the events that have unfolded in Ferguson over the past five months.
Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...black-men.html
Anybody with common sense can see this, lets just hope this goes somewhereEXCLUSIVE: Now Ferguson prosecutor is accused of lying about evidence in ANOTHER grand jury which cleared police of killing two unarmed black men
Misleading? The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of an unnamed juror who wants to speak about the investigation but would be in violation of Missouri law by doing so. The juror also claims prosecutor Bob McCulloch's office favored witnesses who supported Wilson's version of events
The prosecutor at the center of the Ferguson scandal has been accused of lying about evidence presented to grand jurors in an earlier case in which police shot dead two unarmed black men.
The explosive allegation is made in a court case that threatens to lift the lid on the final secrets of the investigation into the shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown last summer.
The unarmed black teen was shot dead by Ferguson cop Darren Wilson, 29, on 9 August. Violent protests raged in the immediate aftermath.
Witness accounts that Brown had raised his hands and begged ‘Don’t shoot’ were later discredited but ‘Hands Up Don’t Shoot’ remained the banner under which protesters marched in November, when public fury reignited with the grand jury’s failure to indict Wilson on any charges.
Now, State Prosecutor Bob McCulloch has been accused of using the secrecy of the grand jury to ‘cover up’ racism and inequity; of withholding evidence through ‘significant’ redactions in the public evidence dump; of falsely suggesting that the grand jury was unified in its final verdict and of lying before – 15 years ago - under uncannily similar circumstances.
The allegations are made by Anthony Rothert, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri in the case of Grand Juror Doe v Robert P McCulloch - an attempt by one of the grand jurors to be allowed to speak openly about what happened in the hearing.
Mr Rothert said, ‘Bob McCulloch has put out his narrative about what the grand jurors thought and it’s not accurate. He’s said he has released all the evidence but there are significant redactions and context missing.’
And it is not the first time Mr McCulloch has been accused of being less than truthful.
Mr Rothert continued, ‘Any government official should be questioned,but there is true reason to be skeptical when Bob McCulloch says he is being fully transparent. He made that claim once before, in the investigation of a June 12, 2000, police shooting.
‘He wasn’t telling the truth. Years later, evidence that he was withholding came out.’
On 12 June 2000 two police officers shot dead two unarmed black men in Berkeley, Missouri – within walking distance of the Ferguson street on which Michael Brown was gunned down.
The incident became infamous locally as the Jack in the Box shootings, named after the fast food chain in whose parking lot the killings took place.
Victim Earl Murray, 36, was a small time drug dealer. His friend Ronald Beasley, also 36, was a married father of three who worked in an auto repair store and just happened to be in Murray’s car when officers sprayed it with 21 bullets.
What followed – public outrage, official reluctance to name the officers, a grand jury’s failure to indict and, significantly, the central roles played by Bob McCulloch and Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson – is strikingly similar to the events that have unfolded in Ferguson over the past five months.
Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...black-men.html