FBA Bishop Mauled By Angry Kenyans For Telling Them Jesus Was Black

Ray D’Angelo Harris

Silky smooth
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,246
Reputation
773
Daps
13,905
Reppin
#dogset
Ok well stop defending them and we won’t assume you’re one of them.

Post a single quote of me defending them. Actually, upon hearing that he was a Hebrew Israelite(I didn’t even know that at first) I literally said, and I quote, “they shoulda kilt that nikka”..
:dwillhuh:



Why are you in this thread responding to posts if you’re not seeking engagement? :jbhmm:

A. Because it’s MY THREAD :dwillhuh:

B. I never said that I wasn’t seeking engagement, I said I wasn’t one of the purple dusties and that I didn’t make this thread to “attack them” :dwillhuh:
 

Ray D’Angelo Harris

Silky smooth
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,246
Reputation
773
Daps
13,905
Reppin
#dogset
Some people take their faith seriously :manny:



This^, coming from someone who can’t decide if he wants to defend the Hebrew Israelites against people criticizing them, or criticize the Hebrew Israelites himself for allegedly “leading Black men to hell” :mjlol: …….

“…Which is why this thread was made as a criticism of Hebrew Israelites.”
“y’all Hebrew Israelites are leading black men specifically to HELL “

How often do people refer to you as “retarded”? Serious question :lupe:
 

Ray D’Angelo Harris

Silky smooth
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,246
Reputation
773
Daps
13,905
Reppin
#dogset
Breh a weirdo. He alluding that I was Muslim because I wasn't going after Islam when Islam had nothing to do with the subject :mindblown:

There are fewer things more cringe than a grown Black man with “weird/weirdo” in his everyday vocabulary. You’re not 13. Express yourself. But yes, he is very delusional. His whole shtick seems to be to reply with completely made-up, off the rails jargon that he conjures up and molds to support whatever point he’s trying to make.

I say ban him. :coffee:
 

DoubleClutch

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
17,213
Reputation
-2,154
Daps
30,730
Reppin
NULL
Post a single quote of me defending them. Actually, upon hearing that he was a Hebrew Israelite(I didn’t even know that at first) I literally said, and I quote, “they shoulda kilt that nikka”..
:dwillhuh:





A. Because it’s MY THREAD :dwillhuh:

B. I never said that I wasn’t seeking engagement, I said I wasn’t one of the purple dusties and that I didn’t make this thread to “attack them” :dwillhuh:

I dunno what you’re talking about, breh

The thread speaks for itself. It’s an open discussion.

Who cares what you think or why you made the thread honestly :manny:
 

DoubleClutch

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
17,213
Reputation
-2,154
Daps
30,730
Reppin
NULL
Breh a weirdo. He alluding that I was Muslim because I wasn't going after Islam when Islam had nothing to do with the subject :mindblown:

You call out all “Abrahamic” religions for tribalism and having cult like tendencies among its leaders/followers, but conveniently ignore Islam as if it has nothing to do with “Abraham” or “race based theology”

The exact teachings of Islam according to their holy book are tribalistic at its core, unlike teachings in Christianity.

Sorry, breh. I’m going to call out your lies and hold you accountable.

You don’t need to “go after Islam” I can do that myself for the entire forum :banderas:

I’m just disappointed in you (someone vocally against organized religions) for being a coward and hypocrite when it comes to the topic of Islam.

And I’m exposing you for specifically picking on Christianity & Christians.

I confronted you about it and you folded. End of story :unimpressed:

I thought we were done talking about this. Don’t mention me anymore :snoop:
 
Last edited:

DoubleClutch

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
17,213
Reputation
-2,154
Daps
30,730
Reppin
NULL
“Especially when the foundation of faith in Jesus IS NOT based on tribalism, lineage or race. Which is why THE REPLIES IN THIS THREAD SHOW a criticism of Hebrew Israelites.”
FIXED :salute:

Hebrew Israelites teachings are focused on tribalism, lineage and race.

The religion is for African/Native Indian Descendants of Slaves only

Followers of Jesus (also know as Christians) teach God sent Jesus for all and reject tribalism, or any linage, race based conditions within Gods ultimate plan for redemption/salvation of Mankind.

The SKIN COLOR of Jesus/God is irrelevant in mainstream Christianity today.

Hebrew Israelites are a recent spin off Cult of Christianity by African Americans in America

Islam is a 6-7 century spin off Cult of Christianity by Arabs is Arabia.

^ I’m not sure how all this is difficult to understand. :yeshrug:
 

DoubleClutch

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
17,213
Reputation
-2,154
Daps
30,730
Reppin
NULL
But with Hebrews, from what I found was written by an unnamed author but has been contributed to Paul in the past. I don't think any author during the time Hebrews was written would know what Moses saw or thought.


Some of the things I was looking up regarding to the Godlogic video


This one is directly related. Interesting discussion.

Last one. Just saw this

1. It doesn’t matter who wrote Hebrews because the point is it EXISTED at the time and was WRITTEN by someone

I never said Paul wrote it. Paul isn’t the ultimate authority

2. It’s proof of the prevailing theology regarding Jesus/God among Jesus followers during a period within the lifetime of Jesus.

This isn’t a Religious debate.

It’s a historical one.

Proving what Moses actually “thought” in this verse isn’t the point. He could be an imaginary figure used for allegorical purposes for all we know……., rather it’s how the early Christians of the 1 century regarded the BIBLE NARRATIVE, understood it and applied it to their teachings regarding the identity of JESUS A REAL MAN who lived at the time and people knew personally.

Moses is irrelevant here other than being a frame of reference for understanding Jesus.

It proves historically early Christians believed Jesus to be GOD or as stated in the debate they had “a high Christology”
 
Last edited:

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
29,500
Reputation
3,139
Daps
71,702
Reppin
NULL
There are fewer things more cringe than a grown Black man with “weird/weirdo” in his everyday vocabulary. You’re not 13. Express yourself. But yes, he is very delusional. His whole shtick seems to be to reply with completely made-up, off the rails jargon that he conjures up and molds to support whatever point he’s trying to make.

I say ban him. :coffee:
I can "talk down" on the coli compared to real life, so I will continue to do so.
Banning him is extreme. He just needs to stop jumping to conclusions
 
Last edited:

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
29,500
Reputation
3,139
Daps
71,702
Reppin
NULL
Last one. Just saw this

1. It doesn’t matter who wrote Hebrews because the point is it EXISTED at the time and was WRITTEN by someone

I never said Paul wrote it. Paul isn’t the ultimate authority

2. It’s proof of the prevailing theology regarding Jesus/God among Jesus followers during a period within the lifetime of Jesus.

This isn’t a Religious debate.

It’s a historical one.

Proving what Moses actually “thought” in this verse isn’t the point. He could be an imaginary figure used for allegorical purposes for all we know……., rather it’s how the early Christians of the 1 century regarded the BIBLE NARRATIVE, understood it and applied it to their teachings regarding the identity of JESUS A REAL MAN who lived at the time and people knew personally.

Moses is irrelevant here other than being a frame of reference for understanding Jesus.

It proves historically early Christians believed Jesus to be GOD or as stated in the debate they had “a high Christology”
Maybe I'm missing understanding godlogic but I thought he said the Hebrews verse he quoted was proof that Jesus was God. If the author is unknown and the verse is just an allegory then how can it be used as proof? IIRC, Hebrews is thought to be written around 60-70 CE.
 

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
29,500
Reputation
3,139
Daps
71,702
Reppin
NULL
FIXED :salute:

Hebrew Israelites teachings are focused on tribalism, lineage and race.

The religion is for African/Native Indian Descendants of Slaves only

Followers of Jesus (also know as Christians) teach God sent Jesus for all and reject tribalism, or any linage, race based conditions within Gods ultimate plan for redemption/salvation of Mankind.

The SKIN COLOR of Jesus/God is irrelevant in mainstream Christianity today.

Hebrew Israelites are a recent spin off Cult of Christianity by African Americans in America

Islam is a 6-7 century spin off Cult of Christianity by Arabs is Arabia.

^ I’m not sure how all this is difficult to understand. :yeshrug:
Christianity Judaism and Islam comes from around the same area of the whole and has roots from religions that birthed the Judaism


 

DoubleClutch

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
17,213
Reputation
-2,154
Daps
30,730
Reppin
NULL
Maybe I'm missing understanding godlogic but I thought he said the Hebrews verse he quoted was proof that Jesus was God. If the author is unknown and the verse is just an allegory then how can it be used as proof? IIRC, Hebrews is thought to be written around 60-70 CE.

Yea I think you’re missing the point

I’ll break it down for you

The debate is: Did the historical Jesus claim to be God?

Hebrews shows the earliest disciples of Jesus regarded him as in a divine nature or a what the debater called a “high Christology” among his followers.

Not everyone who claims to “believe” in Jesus see him in a divine nature or equal with GOD

THIS is the opposite for example to MUSLIMS who 2000 years later we see have developed a “low Christology” (although the Quran actually suggests otherwise) and only regard him as a Human man and no different than any other prophet

And this is fine for them to believe.

The effort being made here isn’t to PROVE JESUS IS GOD

Nobody can prove anyone is GOD. Just like we can’t prove the existence of God

It’s a matter of FAITH ultimately

But what we are debating here is WHO JESUS LEAD PEOPLE TO BELIEVE HE WAS

Based on historical documents and writings we see Jesus early followers considered him basically divine

So the Question posed to NON BELIEVERS is:

what was it so special about Jesus (what did he say or do historically) that made people in his lifetime regard him, a human Man who was born and died, as the GOD of Judaism?

———————————————————-


Who wrote Hebrews and how they interpret Moses is irrelevant to this debate because

1. Hebrews was a book/document confirmed to exist historically by 60 AD

2. The contents of Hebrews show what people believed and taught about Jesus at the time

The point here is not to prove Jesus is God or Moses existed or even Judaism is true.

The debate is a challenge to show HISTORICALLY this (Jesus is GOD) is what people during Jesus time believed

It’s on you (non Christians) to figure out WHY people thought this way

Christians today would say it is because JESUS HISTORICALLY CLAIMED TO BE GOD according to the scriptures.

People living at the same time of Jesus (before the Gospels were completely written/complied might say it is the things he did to make people believe hes God such as:

LIVING SINLESS
TEACHINGS/PARABLES
MIRACLES
PROPHECY FULFILLED
RAISING FROM DEAD
APPEARING TO PEOPLE (Like Paul)

Maybe things like those listed above lead people to believe in Jesus even after his death and become followers

Then they started writing it all down and telling others.

This is just the historical reality we have. And we have early writings like those in the book of HEBREWS to back up the notion that Jesus claimed to be God

“Did Jesus claim to be God” is the subject of the debate

^ I took this question and posed it to you because, you being a Jesus skeptic and non believer in God are faced with the PROBLEM of explaining away the historical Jesus and his impact on the world resulting in billions of people who worship him as God.
 
Last edited:
Top