bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
I guess I don't find "ogling" to be invasive nor oppressive nor intimidating enough to warrant a lawsuit/be included in a suit. I mean if a dude went 1950s cartoon on you and stuck mirrors on his shoes to see up your skirt, that's one thing, but legal action because "he looked at me sexually" I mean did dude lick his lips? Do the V and tongue thing? Was he following hallways staring at you? Paint the picture you want, but if I'm a judge I'm throwing out bullshyt such as I was looked at.
she does mention looking upskirts and following women around just to look at their ass and espn doing nothing about it! have you ever worked for a company and had to sit through sexual harassment training meeting? this is exactly the type of shyt they tell employees not to do lol. fortunately she has some men on her side as witnesses and names some females as defendants. to me that makes it seem like more of a straight up failure on espn as a company to make it a professional environment free of sexual harassment claim rather than "sell out man-hater woman" like some people are making it out to be. i dont even think it will go to trial, probably settle out. but if it does go to trial im sure there will be some women on that jury....