Even Billionaires Love This Guy’s Book About Inequality

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
The more and more we read and apply history to the importance of income and wealth inequality the more and more the wealthy need to read up on the long term sustainability of what it is they are doing.

They don't have to give money to anyone, someone who had the head on their shoulders to make that much money doesn't have to do anything with there money...but they should, and not because of altruism, but because ultimately it's what's good for them and theirs in the long run. regardless if you see this as an issue NOW history has shown us that this gap has been one of the driving forcs behind empire decay since the dawn of time.

add in the altruism and it only makes more sense, you can't take it with you and chances are your seed is going to squander it anyway. I mean really after 1 billion everything else is just about bragging.
 

philmonroe

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
730
Daps
37,464
Reppin
The 215
The more and more we read and apply history to the importance of income and wealth inequality the more and more the wealthy need to read up on the long term sustainability of what it is they are doing.

They don't have to give money to anyone, someone who had the head on their shoulders to make that much money doesn't have to do anything with there money...but they should, and not because of altruism, but because ultimately it's what's good for them and theirs in the long run. regardless if you see this as an issue NOW history has shown us that this gap has been one of the driving forcs behind empire decay since the dawn of time.

add in the altruism and it only makes more sense, you can't take it with you and chances are your seed is going to squander it anyway. I mean really after 1 billion everything else is just about bragging.
This sounds good but on stuff like this if you not a Bill Gates or somebody else that has money and is giving it away its hard to take that serious.
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,790
The more and more we read and apply history to the importance of income and wealth inequality the more and more the wealthy need to read up on the long term sustainability of what it is they are doing.

They don't have to give money to anyone, someone who had the head on their shoulders to make that much money doesn't have to do anything with there money...but they should, and not because of altruism, but because ultimately it's what's good for them and theirs in the long run. regardless if you see this as an issue NOW history has shown us that this gap has been one of the driving forcs behind empire decay since the dawn of time.

add in the altruism and it only makes more sense, you can't take it with you and chances are your seed is going to squander it anyway. I mean really after 1 billion everything else is just about bragging.
it's power by attrition
meaning when no one else has money they have no power in the capitalist society
so taking money from them keeps power over them in your hands
 

Suicide King

#OldBlack
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
4,902
Reputation
745
Daps
7,317
The more and more we read and apply history to the importance of income and wealth inequality the more and more the wealthy need to read up on the long term sustainability of what it is they are doing.

They don't have to give money to anyone, someone who had the head on their shoulders to make that much money doesn't have to do anything with there money...but they should, and not because of altruism, but because ultimately it's what's good for them and theirs in the long run. regardless if you see this as an issue NOW history has shown us that this gap has been one of the driving forcs behind empire decay since the dawn of time.

add in the altruism and it only makes more sense, you can't take it with you and chances are your seed is going to squander it anyway. I mean really after 1 billion everything else is just about bragging.


Why is everyone stuck on this giving money away nonsense? It would be silly to trade one status quo (i.e. selfishness) for another (i.e. altruism).
 

Suicide King

#OldBlack
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
4,902
Reputation
745
Daps
7,317
:beli:

it's not selfishness vs altruism, it's shortsighted selfishness vs long terms selfishness/pragmatism (long term stability)

My argument is salaries have been stagnated since the 80's. Last time we had this much inequality we had the great depression.

Productivity_and_Real_Median_Family_Income_Growth_1947-2009.png


Since the 80's salary growth has remained relatively flat, this is what needs to be addressed.

When I graduated in 2005 from pharmacy school, Walgreens was starting pharmacist at $92,500 a year.

CVS just recently bought out Eckerds, and they were started pharmacist at $107,000 a year. Guess what Walgreens did? They increased pharmacist salary to 107k.

And of course we know all about similiar pay bumps engineers, computer programmers, and IT have seen. Even some blue collar workers seen pay bumps. But most of the middle class salary growth has remained flat.

Even if companies decide a 5 year plan to increase wages, it would be some type of progress. At this point we need solutions, not rhetoric or philosophical/moral analysis of Mr. Scrooge's altruism.
 
Top