Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Why would you expect different? He's a math nerd.
Escobar Season Has RETURNED! ALAN GRAYSON IS BACK!
- Thread starter Baracka Flocka Flame
- Start date
Why would you expect different? He's a math nerd.
Alan Grayson Da Gawd is back in the house 
He was right then and was proven right again this past election night. The national exit polls on things like taxes and healthcare backed up what the man was preaching 3 years ago.
Chief goon back on deck
He was right then and was proven right again this past election night. The national exit polls on things like taxes and healthcare backed up what the man was preaching 3 years ago.
Chief goon back on deck
Last edited by a moderator:
So is this guy.
Last edited by a moderator:
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Alan Grayson Da Gawd is back in the house
29 September, 2009 Rep. Alan Grayson describes the GOP Health Care 'plan': 'Die Quickly' - YouTube
Rep. Alan Grayson on CNN: "Die Quickly" = "GOP Has No Plan" - YouTube
He was right then and was proven right again this past election night. The national exit polls on things like taxes and healthcare backed up what the man was preaching 3 years ago.
Chief goon back on deck
Yeah, everybody freaked out about that don't get sick and if you do die quickly speech that made him famous, but he was exactly right. Talking about he's an extremist and a nut and it was offensive and all this shyt.
Jon Stewart pulled a bytch move at the rally he did when he showed that clip next to some deranged Glenn Beck and Hannity screeds.The Republicans kept bashing healthcare reform, but they had no plan of themselves (well they did have one but Obama adopted it, and then it became "socialism" or whatever). Whenever they talked about what they would do for healthcare, all they talked about was allowing insurance companies to compete interstate and tort reform...like that would do shyt to insure the uninsured, significantly reduce costs, or end denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions.
So yes, essentially they were telling you don't get sick and if you do, die quickly. He was fukking right. People need to speak truth harshly sometimes.
I don't think you understand what's going on here. If anyone got ethered it's Grayson. That being said, I like Grayson. Welcome back.
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Yup. The central banking swap lines were a good move to help ease credit. People just see rich international bankers doing shady shyt with billions of dollars and think
though.What Are Fed Swap Lines and What Do They Do? - Real Time Economics - WSJ
Yup. The central banking swap lines were a good move to help ease credit. People just see rich international bankers doing shady shyt with billions of dollars and think
What Are Fed Swap Lines and What Do They Do? - Real Time Economics - WSJ
Pretty much. Happens all the time with central banks. If provides currency for trade. The loans are guaranteed/collateralized and the Fed earns interest on the swap. Those are all good and normal things.
Type Username Here
Not a new member
Yup. The central banking swap lines were a good move to help ease credit. People just see rich international bankers doing shady shyt with billions of dollars and think
What Are Fed Swap Lines and What Do They Do? - Real Time Economics - WSJ
Citing the Wall Street Journal on this matter is like citing The heritage foundation on Obamacare.
The fact is that Grayson was more challenging the authoritive decision making behind it.
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
All the WSJ article did was provide a brief, very general explanation of how the swap lines work. Do you want me to post an article from the New York Times that says the same thing only more detailed because I'm sure I can find the article there when I first learned about this back in 09 if I searched.
Type Username Here
Not a new member
How about you cite me some peer reviewed economic papers on this matter. Not saying you're lying but as Matt Taibbi has shown, some of these newspapers and investment TV shows turn a blind eye to many things.
Like you would understand those papers. You probably don't understand anything on that WSJ article either. Stop wasting everyone's time.
Type Username Here
Not a new member
Provide a legitimate source or shut the fukk up.
Type Username Here
Not a new member
I doubt that you'll be in any better position to have a serious discussion about things like swaps if I start posting random papers, than you are right now. Which is to say, not at all.