It’s very true and the Khoi San was displaced just as much by the Bantu as they were by the Dutch
Nonsense. I am from Southern Africa...I seriously wonder why some people are so allergic to researching. It's just "X said or wrote something and I believe it"
Khoi and San are distinct groups, that existed and still exist all over Southern Africa. The only place you could say there was a displacement of them, was in Southern Angola and due to the wars(Independence, Bush and Civil wars), but they have been returning slowly.
Bantus in Southern Africa, are the product of Bantu farmers with Khoi and San nomads and H-G. Groups like Xhosa, Tswana, Sotho, Swati, Pedi, Zulu, Shona etc, were born from this, and have high Khoi and San admixture. On the other hand, Bantus in Eastern Africa are the product of Bantu mixing with Nilotic, Omotic, Hadza and Southern Cushytic groups. You can observe this in the physical traits of the different ethnic groups in these regions.
To continue, it is super funny that Bantu genocide, in South Africa, is the only genocide on earth, where the dominant group took millions of traits from the group they supposedly exterminated.
Apparently, it was so brutal, like the one in the Americas, to the point that Khoisan languages and traits have such a huge influence on Bantu languages and people in SA. Nowhere on earth we see this happening. I am not talking about loan words, I am talking about Bantu languages such as Xhosa and Zulu, adopting their phonetic, clicks and structure. Bantu people in Southern Africa, coming out looking like Khoi.
We don't see this with Euros in the Americas, with Han Chinese in Taiwan, with Romans in Britain etc...Only 1 place where this above, highlighted, happened.
Nobody has right to any piece of land it’s all about who can defend their settlement
Isn't interesting how people like you never question why Europeans never apply this logic to Europe? They apply it in the Americas, South Africa, Australia...Why do you think that happens?