I will say, in the absence of concrete reporting/evidence about what this increasingly infamous meeting between Clinton and Warren was actually about, a lot of the fringe left has been running with this idea that Liz is gonna morph into Hillary or some shyt. Saagar mentions Obama hiring Larry Summers as the type of campaign-to-administration flip we should be worried about here, but that ignores the fact that Elizabeth Warren had a much stronger progressive brand than Obama did in '08. Obama was basically a cipher running on progressive platitudes and campaign vagueries. Warren has too much history and experience to pull that move off, even if she wanted to, which there is no indication she does. Saagar also mentions Trump getting his administration backfilled by the RNC, but that to me is a more legitimate concern with Bernie Sanders, who is more similar to Trump than Liz when it comes to lack of policy organization bonafides leading to gaps in leadership that can be filled by the DNC. Liz has a political vision and a rolodex full of progressive thinkers, academics and bureaucrats to call up when she needs to fill her administration. I haven't really seen much of that from Bernie. This, ironically, makes him the candidate more susceptible to DNC fukkery.