If you look at a lot of post-election analysis on the left, they advocated "dumping identity politics"Sadly I do agree with you here to an extent as far as how racism is used by those who wish to see the state dismantled and drive folks to right leaning economic ideas. It’s insidious and disgusting.
However I disagree that the answer is centerism or not to hold fast to progressive economic ideas in spite of that. I know I make this point many times but it’s worth making again. Politicians that campaign on economic progressivism in large win as long as they can present it in a way that is hard to argue with and as a result the opposition ideas are successfully exposed as fukking everyone over like they are intended. Obama did this on the campaign trail (not talking about his actual presidency) that he had these white Walmart working in bumfukk Iowa voting for him.
The message works. You just need someone who can sell it. The racism is a stumbling block but it’s not impossible.
However centerism will make it worse because it inspires no one and in the context of modern politics it’s very much status quo. Secondly, many of the politicians who push this are the type of politicians everyone is sick of. The politician created by a third way think tank and sent out from Washington to try and sell themselves to people instead of it feeling organic and ergo, a “person of the people”. It’s fake and people dislike it. People hate them and they will lose to the right because people can sense the insincerity. As a result we get more far right nuttery. If they do win they do shyt like Mark Warner and et al did the other night where they vote for right wing ideas to be seen as “moderate” to their voters that end up doing he same shyt such as voting no against he admendment in the tax bill to not touch Medicare and social security. .
You know what that means, right?