The problem with y'all's theories is, they aren't clear or concise. You're basing your skepticism of his views and or motives on how you'd do White supremacy. You're using a "No True Scottsman" fallacy. "No REAL White supremacist would have/do/say XYZ" is what you're basing your skepticism. Again, we have another case of White supremacy, being shielded under the veil of conspiracy. No other type of crime is constantly twisted, manipulated, or analyzed quite like ones motivated by White supremacy. Even if he was given orders from someone higher up, it doesn't change the severity of what he did.