Actually, blacking out is the normal response for heavy drinking in a short span. High alcohol levels naturally inhibit memories from forming, etc. The issue we're arguing about, I think, is whether the precursor to that is "abnormal" and/or a sign of a more serious problem. The drinking heavily part, that is, which is debatable.
No its not. If you consume too much alcohol you body will reject it and you will vomit. In extreme cases you will die.
By usual do you mean to say that's applicable for most people? That's not believable at all. If you just mean for those with alcoholism problems later in life, fine. Whether they go hand-in-hand is another matter. They certainly aren't mutually exclusive, sure, but they aren't mutually inclusive either. The latter being the case for most has almost always been my experience.
No just alchies. Normal people have a bad experience and either quit altogether or tone it down a bit. They arent mutually inclusive or exclusive of course there are cases of one existing without the other but what im saying is the little things tend to develop into bigger problems.
Poor analogy, I think, mostly because you're persisting with the idea that HED will invariably lead to alcoholism or put one at an abnormally high risk for it. I've disagreed several times already about that. Meanwhile, swollen lymph nodes in a woman's breast can, at times, be a definitive indication for cancer.
No im not saying that at all. Binge drinking after negative consequences is a symptom of a problem, blacking out can be a symptom AND a risk. If someone is blacking out they might not have a problem at the moment, but if someone is binge drinking even though they know its not a good idea then it IS a problem.
Out of curiosity, when considering the absurd rates of binge drinking on uni campuses and wherever, do you think the majority of post-grads become alcoholics? What's your best guesstimate?
No. There are a bunch of other variables to consider.
Was some page on the CDC website, I believe - closed it and I'm not too inclined to go searching again at the moment... I probably should though. Anyway, there's a margin of error attached to all stats, of course, but it's typically not so large as to put results into question by very much.
but it can be a large magin of error. Science changes all the time.
That might be a problem but I was asking of your cut-off definition for what made someone an "alcoholic" though.
there is no cut off definition. Some people can drink and then stop one day and never look back, others arent so lucky.