Such a victim isn’t heSo you forgetting metro boomin and 80 other nikkas literally ganged up him? Or we ignoring that aspect?
Such a victim isn’t heSo you forgetting metro boomin and 80 other nikkas literally ganged up him? Or we ignoring that aspect?
Plenty people signed that. Drake has never publicly said anything related to that
Y’all trying to spin this into something it ain’t. Kendrick warned this nikka to not get the family involved and he couldn’t help himself, and here we are.
Y’all think UMG got Kendrick to play mercenary for them? Just to sabotage their cashcow? lol
To add to your point.No, actually.
To be defamatory you have to PROVE that they knowingly LIED about something they knew for a fact to be a lie. This bar is very hard to prove since it basically means you have to have black and white proof like in texts or emails of them being like "yeah this is bullshyt but im gonna say it anyway" on some Stringer Bell shyt
Openly speculating or even asserting an opinion about someone based on their character or questionable behavior is not defamatory.
That Drake could have "expected the Epstein angle" or even told him to talk about the young girls because he heard it on the internet undercuts his own case, as it demonstrates speculation about Drake's questionable activities with youngins is already in the public sphere. It's not out of nowhere or pulled out a thin air, and it's certainly not something Drake or anyone else can prove Kendrick doesn't actually believe.
Look man I realize your idol is going out sad but are YOU f*cking stupid?
Drake signed that Gaza sh*t the same month "For All The Dogs" came out. Which went on to....flop? Because he signed the Gaza thing, correct?
Hell f*cking no, it went on to sell like crazy and spawn multiple #1 singles.
Matter of fact, here you are a few months ago feeding into that dumb ass rumor that Drake co-owned UMG:
But he was somehow simultaneously getting black balled because of Gaza?
This is what I was talking about earlier in the thread when I said you cats have zero f*cking shame. No kind of logic, or thought process. Just mindless stanning and goal post moving. How are you cats comfortable as grown men, behaving like this? I'm embarrassed for you.
Fred.
What I’m hearing is that Drake should ignore the fact his label snaked him.But its a battle bruh. He predicted the angle on Taylor Made. No one is shocked. We knew Kendrick was going there. There are alot of things said in a battle that's fighting words. But it's a battle. It stays on wax.
He ended himself.You missed the point. It was not about rap anymore once the stans started the memes, conspiracy theories and calling the police and the feds and the corporate twitters chiming in. That wierd behavior got nothing to with rap. There was a 100 page thread on this site with yall listening to a gay man on twitter make up stories about evidence he had that drake was a pedo. Yall and a lot of stans were obsessed with "ending" drake and actually trying to get him locked up in real life and not a simple rap battle. Same folks now crying about a lawsuit.. the irony.
The amplification of DJ blowjob has been the worst part of this beef
I dont give a shyt if Drake sues his label. I care when people post a cornball DJ like his opinion matters. He doesnt even give proper info. He's been wrong about Kendrick's moves all the timeOh so you mad at a random DJ because your cornball idol is crashing out?
IF thats indeed what happened, honestly yes. He should ignore it. Its way better for his brand and legacy to just let it go then file lawsuits. As time goes by people would look back and appreciate what Drake did in this battle. He's making it impossible to do that.What I’m hearing is that Drake should ignore the fact his label snaked him.
Is that what I’m gathering?
Ja rule never complained about going against Eminem, D 12, Obie Trice, Busta Rhymes, DMX, 50 cent, Lloyd Banks, Yayo, Game, Buck, Dr Dre etc.Such a victim isn’t he