Drake Initiates Legal Action Against UMG...files defamation suit against UMG over being a pedophile. Universal responds

Feed-Me

Superstar
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
4,537
Reputation
1,102
Daps
13,456
Reppin
NULL
Labels are already aggressive with copyright claims…that’s the whole reason it was pointed out In this case :mjlol:…why was this song used under different rules…it was freely available for anybody to react and create content without worrying about any strikes or claims

All the reactors mentioned are financially fine, they aren’t involved in the case…this doesn’t affect them at all. It just gives them more content if they choose to do so
You claiming Drake lost due to aggression?
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,283
Reputation
3,821
Daps
110,728
Reppin
דעת
Labels are already aggressive with copyright claims…that’s the whole reason it was pointed out In this case :mjlol:…why was this song used under different rules…it was freely available for anybody to react and create content without worrying about any strikes or claims

All the reactors mentioned are financially fine, they aren’t involved in the case…this doesn’t affect them at all. It just gives them more content if they choose to do so

So was push-ups as clearly documented by Scruface.

The selective bullsh*t is why this will continue to tarnish his legacy.
 

CASHAPP

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
26,393
Reputation
-2,494
Daps
48,127
I hope Drake realizes after this that UMG gonna give him the Diddy/Diageo treatment soon

ESPN tapes of Drake talking shyt about Kendrick getting leaked

More stories of his encounters with underage girls

More reference tracks leaked of ghostwriter we didn't know about

Whatever weird incident happened with that midget in the wheelchair
 

PHamm

Superstar
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
8,987
Reputation
819
Daps
18,481
Yeah I skim their content and see alot of their reactions but I didn't know they was that extreme with the MAGA love. Like usually people may agree with certain policies but they hardcore right wing. I think they let yOutube videos brainwash them too far

And I just came across a Pic of them on Google chilling with Trumps #1 Indian bootlicker in a plane


Dude in the red is a Drake stan. He took such an L
 
Last edited:

Awesome Wells

The Ghost of Jack Tripper
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
10,096
Reputation
4,020
Daps
31,557
Reppin
Uptown, NYC
And then he called me a OV Hoe...and a...fr....free.....freaky ass nikka

CRNJbf.gif

200w.gif
 

((ReFleXioN)) EteRNaL

RIP MR. SMOKE
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
19,684
Reputation
7,335
Daps
94,237
I didn't real anyone's opinion on this but here's mine from an unbiased perspective and opinion. To make the first thing plainly clear, I do not like Drake as an artist and his actions from this is not what hip hop is about. But, with that said, Drake has never been hip hop in my eyes and his entire career is fraudulent in terms of the unsaid codes that true heads of the culture live. Because of that, he been given too many passes and excuses by casual fans of rap that most true heads of the culture wouldn't accept. A prime example which leads to this karma that Drake is currently receiving is the whole Meek Mill beef and how that was handled not to mentioned it is based on Meek Mill's allegation with solid proof of Drake using ghostwriters. What used to be frown upon by most respectable MCs was excused for Drake. How Drake manipulated the beef to his advantage to discredit and hurt Meek Mill's own career path had changed how to use rap beef. That's where a parent label like UMG took off using these same tactics that made Drake win his rap beefs or protect him from rap beef and it's now flipped where Drake is now the victim of his own creation. In other words, Drake had it coming.

All that being said, Drake from a LEGAL standpoint has a very strong case against UMG. It doesn't matter in reality, Shouts out to Math Hoffa, because a month and a half ago when Drake sent out a petition with the pending to pursue this lawsuit, Hoffa accurately assessed that this has everything to do with Drake's current contract at near expiration and UMG schemed to use the beef between Drake & Kendrick to devalue Drake's marketability so they'll have leverage when it comes to renewing or negotiating Drake's contract. Now, we all do not know the full behind the scenes, but Drake's current contract is massive, and UMG doesn't want to continue to pay what Drake been offering. In contrast, Kendrick would cost less. This leads to a contractual conflict of interests. I think UMG, played both sides, but misled Drake in the presumption that Push Ups and Family Matters would get the massive promo that'll cloud anything Kendrick would do. But UMG did the UNO reverse on Drake and here we are. Drake is just as guilty in putting out false slanderous allegations on Kendrick. But he's not suing Kendrick, but UMG over the contractual conflict of interests and how UMG taking it a step further to destroy Drake's bottom line. I mean, if he has the receipts of the bots to which we know for months that bots were used, that'll go against UMG. It wasn't a secret of UMG through Kendrick in taking off copyright restrictions for YouTubers. Yet those copyright restrictions weren't ever lifted for Drake, which possibly the reason why Drake started using his IG to temporarily drop material. We know for a fact that the false allegations of being a so-called Pd-File certified been promoted in all aspects of pop culture. As well as other supporting evidence made. What's wild to me, however, is Drake correlating the house shooting and the security getting shot with this lawsuit when many of us been under the assumption of it having to do with the Weeknd drama which was separate from the Kendrick beef. That said, with the timing of the NLU release and the shooting and the vandalization of one of his shops and so forth, it makes his argument of his concern of his safety and his family's safety valid.

I'm a J. Cole fan, so part of this is slightly biased when I say this. But at the end of it all, J. Cole been the smartest and most authentic overall of this. Even though many of you may view him backing out is being a cornball move and in normal hip-hop terms, it would have, J. Cole knew how this could devolve into some nonsense that his own evolution in seeking self-meditation and peace would fall apart. If this was on some tradition rap battle, bars and skills type of battle, it would have been all good. But the climate demanded it to be messy. Both Kendrick and Drake obliged. And people are looking at both rappers differently. And the industry machine paraded and profited in the destruction of images of two black men tearing each other apart. We all celebrated it as it being so-called "great" for hip hop, but in reality, it helped nothing at all in uplifting the culture. What Drake did with the lawsuit is wack but understandable when it comes to his bottom line. But what Kendrick did felt like a sellout move to me, because he stooped to Drake's level to get to Drake's level. It's like UMG, Interscope has their new nikka-puppet to tap dance for them to keep them rich.

Umg didn't need a rap battle to lower drake's value. His value had already been plummeting for years. He used to do 800k first week. Now he can barely crack 400k with a 23 song album. After honestly nevermind flopped with 200k first week he been desperate to remain relevant. So the whole argument about umg trying to lower his value doesn't hold weight.

Aubrey just a bytch who can't accept defeat. The whole lawsuit is a joke. Especially trying to connect "not like us" to the shooting at his house. Unless Aubrey can prove those people were motivated by the song then it's just more bullshyt. Aubrey is a kiddie addicted fakkit.

Also the battle was great for the culture. Hip hop took center stage and captivated the whole world. Kendrick got the youth interested in lyrics again. That battle couldn't have been any better for hip hop. Kendrick exposed and eradicated a cancer to the culture. 20 years from now, 2024 will be viewed as a defining moment in hip hop. The reemergence of authenticity.

And J Cole still a bytch and will always be a bytch.
 

THE 101

House Painter
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
15,274
Reputation
4,986
Daps
75,774
I didn't real anyone's opinion on this but here's mine from an unbiased perspective and opinion. To make the first thing plainly clear, I do not like Drake as an artist and his actions from this is not what hip hop is about. But, with that said, Drake has never been hip hop in my eyes and his entire career is fraudulent in terms of the unsaid codes that true heads of the culture live. Because of that, he been given too many passes and excuses by casual fans of rap that most true heads of the culture wouldn't accept. A prime example which leads to this karma that Drake is currently receiving is the whole Meek Mill beef and how that was handled not to mentioned it is based on Meek Mill's allegation with solid proof of Drake using ghostwriters. What used to be frown upon by most respectable MCs was excused for Drake. How Drake manipulated the beef to his advantage to discredit and hurt Meek Mill's own career path had changed how to use rap beef. That's where a parent label like UMG took off using these same tactics that made Drake win his rap beefs or protect him from rap beef and it's now flipped where Drake is now the victim of his own creation. In other words, Drake had it coming.

All that being said, Drake from a LEGAL standpoint has a very strong case against UMG. It doesn't matter in reality, Shouts out to Math Hoffa, because a month and a half ago when Drake sent out a petition with the pending to pursue this lawsuit, Hoffa accurately assessed that this has everything to do with Drake's current contract at near expiration and UMG schemed to use the beef between Drake & Kendrick to devalue Drake's marketability so they'll have leverage when it comes to renewing or negotiating Drake's contract. Now, we all do not know the full behind the scenes, but Drake's current contract is massive, and UMG doesn't want to continue to pay what Drake been offering. In contrast, Kendrick would cost less. This leads to a contractual conflict of interests. I think UMG, played both sides, but misled Drake in the presumption that Push Ups and Family Matters would get the massive promo that'll cloud anything Kendrick would do. But UMG did the UNO reverse on Drake and here we are. Drake is just as guilty in putting out false slanderous allegations on Kendrick. But he's not suing Kendrick, but UMG over the contractual conflict of interests and how UMG taking it a step further to destroy Drake's bottom line. I mean, if he has the receipts of the bots to which we know for months that bots were used, that'll go against UMG. It wasn't a secret of UMG through Kendrick in taking off copyright restrictions for YouTubers. Yet those copyright restrictions weren't ever lifted for Drake, which possibly the reason why Drake started using his IG to temporarily drop material. We know for a fact that the false allegations of being a so-called Pd-File certified been promoted in all aspects of pop culture. As well as other supporting evidence made. What's wild to me, however, is Drake correlating the house shooting and the security getting shot with this lawsuit when many of us been under the assumption of it having to do with the Weeknd drama which was separate from the Kendrick beef. That said, with the timing of the NLU release and the shooting and the vandalization of one of his shops and so forth, it makes his argument of his concern of his safety and his family's safety valid.

I'm a J. Cole fan, so part of this is slightly biased when I say this. But at the end of it all, J. Cole been the smartest and most authentic overall of this. Even though many of you may view him backing out is being a cornball move and in normal hip-hop terms, it would have, J. Cole knew how this could devolve into some nonsense that his own evolution in seeking self-meditation and peace would fall apart. If this was on some tradition rap battle, bars and skills type of battle, it would have been all good. But the climate demanded it to be messy. Both Kendrick and Drake obliged. And people are looking at both rappers differently. And the industry machine paraded and profited in the destruction of images of two black men tearing each other apart. We all celebrated it as it being so-called "great" for hip hop, but in reality, it helped nothing at all in uplifting the culture. What Drake did with the lawsuit is wack but understandable when it comes to his bottom line. But what Kendrick did felt like a sellout move to me, because he stooped to Drake's level to get to Drake's level. It's like UMG, Interscope has their new nikka-puppet to tap dance for them to keep them rich.

1238512492_the-happening-wahlberg.gif
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
31,117
Reputation
4,784
Daps
102,952
It’s not slander if you believe it to be true and if there’s receipts you goof. Theres videos of Drake kissing an underage girl on online and pics of him with underage girls, and lyrics of him talking about high school parking lots looking like strip club parking lots. And “high school you was even bad back then”

shyt he even said he expected to be called Epstein by Kendrick and Kendrick never even said that.

lol he’s a fukking creep pedo groomer and he got called on it and his feelings are hurt. But he asked for the smoke.
The Sierra Canyon line was about the hype over Bronny games. Yall still reaching.


Yall sound more upset than UMG.


Drake's lawyer isnt some nobody. He's won big cases before. He wouldnt have taken this if he didnt think he could win
 

Busby

Real name no gimmicks..
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
7,714
Reputation
1,244
Daps
28,846
Reppin
San Jose, Cali
I hope Drake realizes after this that UMG gonna give him the Diddy/Diageo treatment soon

ESPN tapes of Drake talking shyt about Kendrick getting leaked

More stories of his encounters with underage girls

More reference tracks leaked of ghostwriter we didn't know about

Whatever weird incident happened with that midget in the wheelchair
They gonna make an example out of him..
 

TheNig

Dr.TheNig DDS
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
55,461
Reputation
5,852
Daps
116,229
Reppin
Brolic... Alcoholics
I didn't real anyone's opinion on this but here's mine from an unbiased perspective and opinion. To make the first thing plainly clear, I do not like Drake as an artist and his actions from this is not what hip hop is about. But, with that said, Drake has never been hip hop in my eyes and his entire career is fraudulent in terms of the unsaid codes that true heads of the culture live. Because of that, he been given too many passes and excuses by casual fans of rap that most true heads of the culture wouldn't accept. A prime example which leads to this karma that Drake is currently receiving is the whole Meek Mill beef and how that was handled not to mentioned it is based on Meek Mill's allegation with solid proof of Drake using ghostwriters. What used to be frown upon by most respectable MCs was excused for Drake. How Drake manipulated the beef to his advantage to discredit and hurt Meek Mill's own career path had changed how to use rap beef. That's where a parent label like UMG took off using these same tactics that made Drake win his rap beefs or protect him from rap beef and it's now flipped where Drake is now the victim of his own creation. In other words, Drake had it coming.

All that being said, Drake from a LEGAL standpoint has a very strong case against UMG. It doesn't matter in reality, Shouts out to Math Hoffa, because a month and a half ago when Drake sent out a petition with the pending to pursue this lawsuit, Hoffa accurately assessed that this has everything to do with Drake's current contract at near expiration and UMG schemed to use the beef between Drake & Kendrick to devalue Drake's marketability so they'll have leverage when it comes to renewing or negotiating Drake's contract. Now, we all do not know the full behind the scenes, but Drake's current contract is massive, and UMG doesn't want to continue to pay what Drake been offering. In contrast, Kendrick would cost less. This leads to a contractual conflict of interests. I think UMG, played both sides, but misled Drake in the presumption that Push Ups and Family Matters would get the massive promo that'll cloud anything Kendrick would do. But UMG did the UNO reverse on Drake and here we are. Drake is just as guilty in putting out false slanderous allegations on Kendrick. But he's not suing Kendrick, but UMG over the contractual conflict of interests and how UMG taking it a step further to destroy Drake's bottom line. I mean, if he has the receipts of the bots to which we know for months that bots were used, that'll go against UMG. It wasn't a secret of UMG through Kendrick in taking off copyright restrictions for YouTubers. Yet those copyright restrictions weren't ever lifted for Drake, which possibly the reason why Drake started using his IG to temporarily drop material. We know for a fact that the false allegations of being a so-called Pd-File certified been promoted in all aspects of pop culture. As well as other supporting evidence made. What's wild to me, however, is Drake correlating the house shooting and the security getting shot with this lawsuit when many of us been under the assumption of it having to do with the Weeknd drama which was separate from the Kendrick beef. That said, with the timing of the NLU release and the shooting and the vandalization of one of his shops and so forth, it makes his argument of his concern of his safety and his family's safety valid.

I'm a J. Cole fan, so part of this is slightly biased when I say this. But at the end of it all, J. Cole been the smartest and most authentic overall of this. Even though many of you may view him backing out is being a cornball move and in normal hip-hop terms, it would have, J. Cole knew how this could devolve into some nonsense that his own evolution in seeking self-meditation and peace would fall apart. If this was on some tradition rap battle, bars and skills type of battle, it would have been all good. But the climate demanded it to be messy. Both Kendrick and Drake obliged. And people are looking at both rappers differently. And the industry machine paraded and profited in the destruction of images of two black men tearing each other apart. We all celebrated it as it being so-called "great" for hip hop, but in reality, it helped nothing at all in uplifting the culture. What Drake did with the lawsuit is wack but understandable when it comes to his bottom line. But what Kendrick did felt like a sellout move to me, because he stooped to Drake's level to get to Drake's level. It's like UMG, Interscope has their new nikka-puppet to tap dance for them to keep them rich.
There is no way you typed all of this on a phone. :heh:
 
Top