Drake Initiates Legal Action Against UMG...files defamation suit against UMG over being a pedophile. Universal responds

[FreedMind]

Litigation ain't wavy word to 40 glocc and lord finesse

 

[mbewane]

The Irony of this post coming from a Knicks fan. Half the people in this thread weren't born the last time the Knicks won a chip

Knicks STILL have more titles than Drake's team tho

 

[mobbinfms]

If theres any evidence that kendrick got EXTRA-non-explicitly-contractual (i.e. non-specified) assistance, that would be a contract violation

Why?
Wouldn’t it make sense to go above and beyond to promote a hit to maximize profits?

Mix this in with how incestuous UMG is with Spotify, then you have a big fukking problem.

What’s the problem?

Now you can argue that rap battles are inherently bad for business above and beyond risks of violence and escalation, but in terms of sheer music, UMG has a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders and tanking an internal asset like Drake is literally not only a contract violation but in the business sense, unethical.

A fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of their shareholders, i.e. maximize shareholder value. Seems to me they met that duty by not only promoting one of the biggest hit songs in the past decade, but also simultaneously negotiating a better deal with Drake. Unless you assume UMG was doing this all to lose money?

 

[Dre Space Age]

I have to keep remembering he's Canadian cause Americans all agree this behavior is Not Like Us.

 

[TEKBEATZ]

Damn homie just killed is rap career. Heard he wants to sue the NFL for letting Kdot perform.

 

[Yecht]

After about 10 listens through

GNX is 10/10 for me

Roller coaster of beautiful production and intentful lyrics.

dont care who disagrees

This is how it should be fukk what anybody else talmbout. How you feel is how you feel

 

[Koapa]

 

[Playaz Eyez]

 

[Roadside]

Let me be clear (to the extent I understand):

• If theres any evidence that kendrick got EXTRA-non-explicitly-contractual (i.e. non-specified) assistance, that would be a contract violation

Who's contract would be violated?

 

[BK The Great]

They about to pull out all the dirt he was involved in, not a good sign for rappers who did the same shyt.

 

[hex]

I think it's hilarious when "Push Ups" dropped Drake stans were clowning Kendrick for supposedly being taken advantage of by the people above him.

Now those same people are asking us to sympathize with Drake....who is apparently being taken advantage of by the people above him.

FOH.

Fred.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Why?
Wouldn’t it make sense to go above and beyond to promote a hit to maximize profits?

Heres the thing, if you violate a contract in a way that you overlook because it doesn’t hurt you, then no one will say anything

But…a contract violation is still a violation

What’s the problem?

Whats the issue if General Motors owns gas stations?

A fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of their shareholders, i.e. maximize shareholder value. Seems to me they met that duty by not only promoting one of the biggest hit songs in the past decade, but also simultaneously negotiating a better deal with Drake. Unless you assume UMG was doing this all to lose money?

Yeah, in the middle of renegotiation efforts with another major act: Tortious interference

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

This frumpy loser used to be a drake Stan. Thats @Busby homegirl

This fukking clown is not a lawyer

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

They about to pull out all the dirt he was involved in, not a good sign for rappers who did the same shyt.

 

[BK The Great]

That dude is a Drake groupie.