Mike Nasty
Superstar
All these type comments conveniently ignore the fully loaded 767s that were flown into the top floors.
Also why not just plant explosives and then say the terrorist planted the explosives, why bother with the airplanes.
Does the coli still believe planes brought down the towers on 9/11?
- Thread starter MillionMills
- Start date
Also why not just plant explosives and then say the terrorist planted the explosives, why bother with the airplanes.
AlainLocke
Banned
OMG...logic...
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Here are actual architects and structural engineer experts.
Are you denying science and the laws of physics?
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
This is the most in depth investigation I have ever seen about 9/11. Straight facts.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Last edited:
IVS
Superstar
I do know some planes hit buildings and that those building fell a bit later. But the manner in which they fell leads me to believe that the fires from the plane hitting the building are not the sole cause for the collapse of the structures.
In fact the uniform nature of how 3 structures collapsed like demolitions is what makes me wonder if it was the fires that were responsible because they should have fallen in a different manner in all 3 cases.
In fact the uniform nature of how 3 structures collapsed like demolitions is what makes me wonder if it was the fires that were responsible because they should have fallen in a different manner in all 3 cases.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Breh, that video above is asking even bigger questions and I'm only 1 hour in.
How tf was that hijacked plane allowed into washington airspace and not shot down? Chain of command being purposely changed that day as well as 4 war games going on to leave the north east unprotected. Rookie terrorist that could never possibly know how to fly those commercial airliners the way they flew. These are the questions that people should be asking. This documentary is
x100.
Last edited:
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Why has not one image or video of any of 19 hijackers boarding one of the planes been released after 17 years??? There should be tons of footage of them going through the airports right? Why make an impossible 360 turn maneuver to hit the pentagon from the side when you could have just plunged into the top and killed way more people??? And the guy that supposedly did it couldn't even fly a fukking single engine plane!?!?!
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
1 hr 30 mins in.How tf is there not ONE recording of ANY of the 19 hijackers on the black boxes that record all activity inside the cockpit? No voice of them or any struggle?
How did the 2 black boxes from the planes that hit the towers go missing? And the one that hit the pentagon damaged beyond repair? They are built to withstand those types of crashes.
How tf is there not ONE recording of ANY of the 19 hijackers on the black boxes that record all activity inside the cockpit? No voice of them or any struggle?How did the 2 black boxes from the planes that hit the towers go missing? And the one that hit the pentagon damaged beyond repair? They are built to withstand those types of crashes.
Last edited:
Yup.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Can you help answer any of the questions I asked above then?
I'll wait.
No need. I'm not a conspiracy theorist and I don't over analyze things. Mistakes and mishaps happen.Can you help answer any of the questions I asked above then?
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
I'm not talking about mistakes breh? How is a rookie pilot doing an impossible 360 maneuver a mistake? How is the black boxes and flight recording data from the planes that hit the towers never recovered a mistake? How is not releasing one image of any of the 19 hijackers boarding one of the planes a mistake? How is not releasing flight 93's recording to the victim's families to prove it got hijacked a mistake? How is leaving only 4 jets to defend the nations north east a mistake? How is letting all 4 airliners crash and not shooting them down a mistake? How is letting a hijacked plane into Washington airspace a mistake?