Does the coli still believe planes brought down the towers on 9/11?

[96Blue]

Yall still believe what bush and company told yall? The 9/11 commission story?

Or do yall really know what happened?

EDIT: I believe bombs were planted in the basements of each tower, sort of like a controlled demolition. I'll put up some videos of witnesses and firefighters stating they heard bombs before the buildings came down.

Hasn't it already been confirmed that 9/11 was an inside job?

 

[kevm3]

Anyone found those WMDS in Iraq yet? It's not surprising people are skeptical of the official story, especially given WTC7 and given how fast they had these 'protective measures' like body scanners at airports ready to implement right after it happened.

 

[Man]

FAQs - NIST WTC 7 Investigation


​

A lot of bullshyt in those FAQs Didn't read past 8 and 9

FOH

 

[OJ Simpsom]

 

[getmoney310cpt]

FAQs - NIST WTC 7 Investigation

​

What agency you work for cac? Tell them suck my dikk you agent

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

the ball and me have different initial forces and starting points, the same as the debris and the main structure of the building, so the speed and time has to be different

The acceleration, starting points and initial forces are EXACTLY the same. The only difference is air resistance, ie., friction.

To take your example one step further, if you and a golf ball or tennis ball were dropped at the same time, the golf/tennis ball would hit the ground first.

If the ball were a fully inflated beach ball, YOU would hit the ground first. All due to air resistance/friction.

Here are two experiments to prove it.........





Without air, the objects hit the surface simultaneously.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Popular Mechanics Investigates 9/11 Myths: FAQs

​

A decade after the World Trade Center disaster, rampant speculation abounds on what actually happened. Wild talk flourishes on the Internet, TV, and radio. Was the Pentagon really struck by a missile? Was the untimely death of Barry Jennings, who witnessed the collapse of Tower 7 and thought he heard “explosions,” actually an assassination? Not everyone is convinced the truth is out there. Once again, in this updated edition of the critically acclaimed Debunking 9/11 Myths, Popular Mechanics counters the conspiracy theorists with a dose of hard, cold facts.

The magazine consulted more than 300 experts in fields like air traffic control, aviation, civil engineering, fire fighting, and metallurgy, and then rigorously, meticulously, and scientifically analyzed the 25 most persistent 9/11 conspiracy theories. Each one was conclusively refuted with facts, not politics and rumors, including five new myths involving the collapse of 7 World Trade Center and four longstanding conjectures now considered in the context of new research.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Hasn't it already been confirmed that 9/11 was an inside job?

No. Just so we're clear on my stance on this subject, I blame the entire Bush Administration for criminal negligence but there is not enough evidence to accuse or convict them of actually orchestrating the attacks. If there were, there'd be no need for all this speculation almost 20 years after the fact. There'd be no way they could cover something this large up since it would take, literally, thousands of people actively participating in it, globally, in order to pull it off.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

What agency you work for cac?

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Didn't read past 8 and 9

Which is why your opinion on this subject is worthless.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Anyone found those WMDS in Iraq yet? It's not surprising people are skeptical of the official story, especially given WTC7 and given how fast they had these 'protective measures' like body scanners at airports ready to implement right after it happened.

That's two fallacious arguments, though, since correlation doesn't equate causation and just because a certain amount of people believe a proposition to be true or false doesn't make it so.

Facts, not arguments, make a proposition more probable than not.

The 'facts' espoused by those stating the Gov't. is directly responsible for the attacks don't quite measure up to conflicting evidence and 'facts' showing that the attacks were planned and executed by outside elements hostile to the United States.​

 

[sfgiants]

I don't believe any official story the government says. If they claimed they were detonated by bombs I wouldn't believe that shyt either

 

[jalamanta]

If you are from the US and believe the official story I got news for you. You are fukked in the head.

 

[Afrodroid]

Anyone found those WMDS in Iraq yet? It's not surprising people are skeptical of the official story, especially given WTC7 and given how fast they had these 'protective measures' like body scanners at airports ready to implement right after it happened.

The biggest weapon of mass destruction is the tongue, Bush Jr. with his bullshyt speech made most of the alienated americans support the invasion fueled by vengeance.

 

[bl2k8]

NONE of them were constructed in the same manner as WTC 1, 2 and 7, either.

NONE of them were allowed to burn, uncontrolled, for hours.​

How many homes were constructed via 'tube-in-a-tube', hit by passenger jets, and allowed to burn, uncontrolled for several hours?

I'll answer for you: NONE.​

They keep ignoring this though. It amazes me that people are really trying to act as if scenarios like 9/11 have occurred in the past when it’s uprcedented