Inmate60863
Pro
Alex Jones is definitely a plant spreading dis-information.
Does the coli still believe planes brought down the towers on 9/11?
- Thread starter MillionMills
- Start date
i appreciate the time stamp.
i didnt hear any specific sound, just the people filming
and their commentary.
i still do not agree that the average civillian can determine the difference in the sound of an explosion vs a noise thats created by explosives. that includes firefighters.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
1:03:55 mark.
I'll keep posting this video until we start having a real debate in this thread about it.
I'll keep posting this video until we start having a real debate in this thread about it.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
You missed the mark probably. Dude is on the phone talking and a loud explosion happens. Then they start going into all the other witnesses.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
There's A LOT more proof in that whole video besides the eye witnesses that saw and heard explosions. It's 2 hours. They debunk Building 7, Twin Towers, Pentagon and the so called plane that went down in PA. It's all there.i still do not agree that the average civillian can determine the difference in the sound of an explosion vs a noise thats created by explosives. that includes firefighters.
if you dont mind
can you just spell out what you believe happened
im sure you have throughout the thread but i didnt get it
-controlled explosives and Twin Towers and 7
? at the pentagon
? flight 93
were there highjackers?
were there 4 commercial planes?
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Honestly it's an essay to explain everything which is why I'm posting that video cause it explains everything you just asked AND MORE.
I'm still watching it BTW. Very interesting what these fine men and women have done over the past 16 years to bring truth to light. Most of them are family members of the deceased trying to find closure because the government never gave them a fair and honest investigation which is what the video starts out explaining in the first 20 mins.
i would be interested in hearing from family members. I will watch when i get a spare hour to really pay attention.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Funny you say that cause I'm now watching this part specifically about a family member that lost his son outside the lobby of one of the towers. Just watch this 5 min segment please.
1:13:35 mark.
I feel so sad for this guy's family. They didn't deserve to lose a son (r.i.p.) like that.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Al Quaeda a plant by the CIA brehs.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Snowden was right.
@Ghostwriter in here flipping out 
Chill breh.
The fact that explosion sounds were heard/reported by eyewitnesses ≠ there were actual controlled explosives going off.
You'd have to be able to find evidence of there being controlled explosives present. Even buildings being purposefully demolished via explosives have evidence that explosives were used.
Was there cordite, black powder, or any bomb fragments found anywhere? :bpthink:
Do any structural parts of building 7 (or any others) show evidence of being weakened by explosions? :bpthink:
Finally--and here's the most important part if we're approaching this logically--are controlled explosives the best explanation of the data we have available? :bpthink:
Chill breh.
The fact that explosion sounds were heard/reported by eyewitnesses ≠ there were actual controlled explosives going off.
You'd have to be able to find evidence of there being controlled explosives present. Even buildings being purposefully demolished via explosives have evidence that explosives were used.
Was there cordite, black powder, or any bomb fragments found anywhere? :bpthink:
Do any structural parts of building 7 (or any others) show evidence of being weakened by explosions? :bpthink:
Finally--and here's the most important part if we're approaching this logically--are controlled explosives the best explanation of the data we have available? :bpthink:
the artist known az
Hail the victors
Naw breh. It was from explosions. Don't believe me. Just go to 1:03:55 mark of this video and listen to how many eye witnesses on 9/11 heard/saw explosions for the next 5 mins.
How can you still say that it fell from melted beams and not explosives?You gotta be some special kinda stupid.
So a jet crashing into a building wouldn't sound like an explosion when it was shown on live tv it looked like an explosion?
How many times when they interview witnesses during mass shootings, etc they say it sounded like an explosion? I take it as that's most people description when something loud & chaotic happens
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
We would know all that if the government didn't have all the evidence destroyed. Forget all that though. Even if one of the attacks are questionable, the entire event is. Where was the plane in the field in PA? Where was the plane that went into the pentagon? How tf did Building 7 go down from fukking flying debris???? How many other questions about that day can one ask without having reasonable doubt.@Ghostwriter in here flipping out
Chill breh.
The fact that explosion sounds were heard/reported by eyewitnesses ≠ there were actual controlled explosives going off.
You'd have to be able to find evidence of there being controlled explosives present. Even buildings being purposefully demolished via explosives have evidence that explosives were used.
Was there cordite, black powder, or any bomb fragments found anywhere? :bpthink:
Do any structural parts of building 7 (or any others) show evidence of being weakened by explosions? :bpthink:
Finally--and here's the most important part if we're approaching this logically--are controlled explosives the best explanation of the data we have available? :bpthink:
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Those were explosions that happened after the planes hit. Explosions from within the towers.