shyt is crazy. It caused so much confusion alot of jets didnt realize it was a real attack in New York thinking it was still a drill.
Does the coli still believe planes brought down the towers on 9/11?
- Thread starter MillionMills
- Start date
It looks like the faa did contact Norad though. I doubt they would have shot the plane down unless they knew the hijackers intentions. I don't know what the procedure was for that time period though.
NoChillJones
Banned
FOCUS | Cheney's Halliburton Made $39.5 Billion on Iraq War
readersupportednews.org/.../16561-focus-cheneys-halliburton-made-395-billion-on-ir...
Mar 20, 2013 - dikk Cheney's Halliburton made billions of dollars from the Iraq war. ..... It would be hard to execute 9/11 without word getting out, but ignoring it ...
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Lol at this fukking idiot. One building is collapsing from the very bottom and the other from the very top. shyt is clear as day. Believe whatever you want to believe. Can't change a dumb fukk's mind.
StretfordRed
Afro-European
References to these? Not saying BS. Just wanna see it for myself
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Americans are fukking retards. Ya'll STILL think planes and fire can bring down sky scrapers. Tf are they teaching you idiots in school? Those NY skyscrapers must be magical cause they would be the ONLY ONES IN HISTORY TO EVER go down because of fire. And you idiots still take that as truth like some retarded sheep minions.
They were brought down by explosives. PERIOD. The world knows what America did to itself that day. We will never forget.
The world trade centers are also the only 100 story buildings in history to be hit by hijacked 767 jets. What happened that day is unprecedented, stop acting like the exact same scenario has played out before for you to have any idea as to what should have happened
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Building 7 was never hit by a plane you retard.
And burning jet fuel would never bring down those towers. The science has been settled on that for over a decade. Try again or keep being a retarded minion with your USA flag. Land of the sheep. Home of the slaves.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Never forget:
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 44,631
- Reputation
- 8,094
- Daps
- 121,493
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Ghostwriter said:
No, the fires didn't bring down the towers. Physics + gravity did all the work after the structures were significantly weakened by fires and structural damage.
There was no need for explosives and NONE were found at the site.
The buildings fell at less than free-fall speed (I can show you the math to prove it) and not into their own footprint.
The 'first time in history' argument is disingenuous since there were no other buildings constructed like the Towers in the entire world.
You're comparing apples to watermelons.
There was no need for explosives and NONE were found at the site.
The buildings fell at less than free-fall speed (I can show you the math to prove it) and not into their own footprint.
The 'first time in history' argument is disingenuous since there were no other buildings constructed like the Towers in the entire world.
You're comparing apples to watermelons.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
No, the fires didn't bring down the towers. Physics + gravity did all the work after the structures were significantly weakened by fires and structural damage.
There was no need for explosives and NONE were found at the site.
The buildings fell at less than free-fall speed (I can show you the math to prove it) and not into their own footprint.
The 'first time in history' argument is disingenuous since there were no other buildings constructed like the Towers in the entire world.
You're comparing apples to watermelons.
Building 7 too? You have ZERO explanation for that. And them towers were 100 stories, you telling me the shyt melted like that in less than an hour. FOH. Witnesses smelt explosive materials at ground zero and the pentagon. I've done my research. Maybe you need to stop watching fox news for your research like a fukking minion. The 2 videos I posted above are proof and have eye witnesses and scientific facts. YOU KNOW WHAT FACTS ARE RIGHT? Maybe try watching them instead of being a retarded sheep.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 44,631
- Reputation
- 8,094
- Daps
- 121,493
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Ghostwriter said:
Building 7 was hit by debris from the collapse of Towers 1 & 2 which caused fires to burn, out of control, for several hours. Burning jet fuel didn't bring down the towers. A force noted as 'strain' did. The steel used to construct the outer walls of the Towers and Bldg. 7 were heated by uncontrolled fires which caused the steel to lose about 20-30% of it's strength and initiate collapses.
OJ Simpsom
Superstar
Building 7 was hit by debris from the collapse of Towers 1 & 2 which caused fires to burn, out of control, for several hours. Burning jet fuel didn't bring down the towers. A force noted as 'strain' did. The steel used to construct the outer walls of the Towers and Bldg. 7 were heated by uncontrolled fires which caused the steel to lose about 20-30% of it's strength and initiate collapses.
Retarded minion moving goal posts. First Jets are not like fire so they can bring down a building. Now fukking fiery debris is enough? GTFOH you retard. Fire is fire. and fire has never brought down a building. Jet fuel can't burn hot enough to take down those towers. You know nothing.
I'll post it again for anyone that dares to press play to get FACTS and not Fox News BS.
StretfordRed
Afro-European
So we do not believe there was a conspiracy, or doubting the evidence...and automatically we're cacs, c00ns, or watch Fox News 