Does the coli still believe planes brought down the towers on 9/11?

[Worthless Loser]

Why do you keep trying to derail this thread?

Post evidence to support what you're saying or stop quoting me

It's that simple

Post your degrees

So fire from fuel burn it down....how come it's never happened before and after?

So you don't think that was enough to rupture the frame of the building and cause the entire building to go down?

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

So you live in CT.... how does this prove anything of the event?

Because I know people who were there and I knew the teacher who died retard.

 

[Worthless Loser]

Never met a real one who wasn't a conspiracy theorist and didn't have their own ideas about what the government is really upto. Only cacs are dumb enough to think the government works exactly the way they say it does.

So in order to be a real one you have to go against the grain all the time and question intel agencies that are quite frankly, smarter, more educated, more knowledgeable about the situation at hand than you but but but wait, because you're a real one you're smarter than all of them because your bullshyt theories are more credible than people who put their life's work and hours/days/months into gathering the facts and finalizing reports.

This forum. I can't.

 

[julesocean]

Yup

As I said in this thread before, THE MAJORITY OF THE JET FUEL IN BOTH PLANES WAS CONSUMED DURING THE INITIAL IMPACT

The fact that you think that there was enough fuel in ANY part of the wtc buildings to heat up the ENTIRETY of the steel foundation to cause them to bend and collapse FOR THE FIRST AND ONLT TIME EVER IN HUMAN HISTORY, TWICE WITHIN AN hour honestly speaks to your own lack of intelligence more than anything

AND ONCE AGAIN, you are speaking about the "pancake theory", which NIST has said IS NOT WHAT THEIR FINAL REAULTS CONCLUDE

So you don't even believe the official story smh. You're asking me to disprove something that the people you blindly believe don't even believe anymore smh

Come in and get attacked within the first paragraph. I just want to debate theories and facts, not whether any of us are "dumb" or "blind" for believing one side. C'mon breh, act like someone who made it out of high school. :_charles:

It's not the first time in history, there are many news reports where just semi truck fires on bridges do enough structural damage to the steel that they have to close them for long times to fix them.

As for the amount of fuel, I'm not sure if you know how much fuel is carried in planes like that, but even 25% is a MASSIVE amount. I feel like people misunderstand that fact that 75 percent of the fuel got burned right away, just because it's a large percentage number. And regarding that they had already been flying, they don't just fill planes up with enough fuel to barely make the trip and that's it.

Here is a video of a recoverer stating the soles of their boots were beginning to melt at some points because it was still quite hot weeks after it happened. Of course disregard this tidbit if you think think she an actor.

 

[heavynutz]

AGAIN:


THIS IS AN ORANGE...

 

[chowism]

It's funny how some of y'all be mad skeptical about what white people say but at the same time believe everything they tell us lol

Exactly

 

[Inmate60863]

I believe if my memory serves correct, the news reported that they found his passport in the rubble that evening. Amidst all that destruction, dark smoke, and rubble a paper passport was found that just happened to belong to one of the terrorists.

Lol sure.

Well a cop was given the passport before the buildings even fell.

FBI agent Dan Coleman explains how the passport of 9/11 hijacker Satam Al Suqami was "found"

 

[Arithmetic]

The only one I question is WTC 7.

 

[Inmate60863]

Come in and get attacked within the first paragraph. I just want to debate theories and facts, not whether any of us are "dumb" or "blind" for believing one side. C'mon breh, act like someone who made it out of high school. :_charles:

It's not the first time in history, there are many news reports where just semi truck fires on bridges do enough structural damage to the steel that they have to close them for long times to fix them.

As for the amount of fuel, I'm not sure if you know how much fuel is carried in planes like that, but even 25% is a MASSIVE amount. I feel like people misunderstand that fact that 75 percent of the fuel got burned right away, just because it's a large percentage number. And regarding that they had already been flying, they don't just fill planes up with enough fuel to barely make the trip and that's it.

Here is a video of a recoverer stating the soles of their boots were beginning to melt at some points because it was still quite hot weeks after it happened. Of course disregard this tidbit if you think think she an actor.

I could see wtc out the apt I lived in. It was still smoking weeks later. I know that for a fact.

 

[Arithmetic]

I remember one nikka on here said the government created hurricane Irma so we will forget about Charlottesville

 

[Unknown Poster]

Which plane hit WTC Building 7?

This.

 

[Shorty K]

So in order to be a real one you have to go against the grain all the time and question intel agencies that are quite frankly, smarter, more educated, more knowledgeable about the situation at hand than you but but but wait, because you're a real one you're smarter than all of them because your bullshyt theories are more credible than people who put their life's work and hours/days/months into gathering the facts and finalizing reports.

This forum. I can't.

Cac

 

[Worthless Loser]

Cac

Ban bet?

 

[Shorty K]

Ban bet?

fukk up cac

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

All that controlled demolition shyt has been thoroughly debunked btw.

No it hasnt