Does the coli still believe planes brought down the towers on 9/11?

[julesocean]

By telling people that fire can melt steel beams, when it has never happened before in the entirety of history

But it happened twice on the same day, within an hour of each other

The story you believe completely defies the laws of physics

Can you speak on the theory engineers bring up, that the fire wasn't hot enough to melt the steel beams, but instead be hot enough to significantly expand and bow the steel flooring, causing it to buckle in on the beams?

article: Structural engineer describes what went wrong inside the World Trade Center on Sept. 11: 12/01

(goto "born of steel")

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

And the US spends almost a trillion dollars a year on defense

Yet apparently some brown people with box cutters hijacked multiple US airplanes and none of them were intercepted by out trillion dollar defense

Oh yeah and the mastermind was a dude in a cave in the middle east using walkie talkies

That's what you actually believe smh

You sure you meant to quote me breh. I'm actually in agreement with you.

 

[xCivicx]

That's not true at all. I believe the 9/11 attack's were allowed to be executed. That doesn't mean I believe in flat earth, or sandy hook, etc... Something's are logically refutable, others not so much.

Feel free to start a thread on the other 2 topics you mentioned.

I'm not sure what you think can be "logically refuted" but I dare you to try to logically refute anything I have to say oh either topic

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

I believe Bush knew and just let that shyt happen so he'd be justified in his Iraq crusade. Typical cacs say "they're all arabs!!! fukk um!"

 

[Worthless Loser]

Breh, nobody called for impeachment after the 9/11 attacks.

That's the point. Read it again.

 

[xCivicx]

LOL I can debate it. I just learned that the Coli is full of idiots so when evidence is presented all they do is come up with shyt out of their ass to discredit or spin the topic. It's an endless cycle of ignorance.

So in other words, you can't actually support your argument with factual evidence

 

[xCivicx]

Link.

Actually read the thread you're posting smh

It's literally on the page before your post

 

[xCivicx]

Post your degree.

Simpleton who are you??

I have absolutely nothing to prove to a
pseudo-intellectual on the intenet

I would have to respect your opinion first before I wanted to prove any of my credentials to you

 

[Worthless Loser]

So in other words, you can't actually support your argument with factual evidence

I'm not falling for the bait of posting all of the intel reports from google (Which anyone can search) only for idiots here to post some off the wall shyt to spin/deflect falsely discredit them. That's been done a million times before. Tired of it.

Actually read the thread you're posting smh

It's literally on the page before your post

Too lazy.

 

[MR. Conclusion]

The original story never sat right with me. The presence of thermite at ground zero, beams cut at angles that resemble beams cut with shape charges. A lot of stuff doesn't add up. They say they recovered the passport of one of the hijackers, so a paper pass port survived that huge fireball when the plane hit even tho the plane's black box didn't.

I believe if my memory serves correct, the news reported that they found his passport in the rubble that evening. Amidst all that destruction, dark smoke, and rubble a paper passport was found that just happened to belong to one of the terrorists.

Lol sure.

 

[julesocean]

Except the CIA told the White house about an imminent attack on May 1'st of 2001

Opinion | The Bush White House Was Deaf to 9/11 Warnings

This report does nothing to support a theory on either side, except that the terrorists outsmarted the US government. The fact that it says they thought if an attack did happen, it would come in Saudi Arabia, shows how wildly inaccurate their sources close to these groups were, and just ho unprepared the US was to battle terrorism at the time.

No matter what theory you believe, the US let down their own citizens.

 

[Worthless Loser]

Simpleton who are you??

I have absolutely nothing to prove to a
pseudo-intellectual on the intenet

I would have to respect your opinion first before I wanted to prove any of my credentials to you

LOL I could post my degrees in literally 3 minutes. What's the problem? If you so smart then post your stuff.

 

[Edub]

No

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

TLR in the past few years demonstrates the arc of most online forums

The pick-up artist misogynists start trickling in to test the waters, then the ultra rightwing nutjobs and white supremacist apologists start filing in, and now finally the "Jet fuel can't melt steel beam" loose change guys show up (ten years late) calling us sheep to put the final crazy nail in the coffin.

Haven't we been banning most of these type posters tho? or they are at least in the deep red to point them out

 

[thekingsmen]

Ok? And what does that have to do with the report findings? How does that discredit the 911 reports?

The claim they attacked Afghanistan because of 9/11 when the plans were way ahead of it.