Idiots still using team accomplishments to rank an individual's dominance? The only thing Curry had over Lebron was a better roster.
Jordan 91-98. I answered Kobe in the OP.what years were Jordans era OP? Or Kobe for that matter?
Forgot about Duncan. So yeah between him Shaq and Kobe, they don't have their own eras. They have an era, just not by themselves.Kobe definitely shared his era with Timmy
Thank you. Said this exact same thing in the OP and 2K thread but mfs wanna act stupid.
JORDAN AND BILL RUSSELL
ARE THE ONLY PLAYERS
WHO DIDNT SHARE AN ERA.
This sassy nikka ran to the Coliseum for backup and didn’t even have the balls to tag me in the thread.
Seems to me there are more LeBron fans that post on this board than Kobe fans or MJ fansThis is the coli so the answer would be overwhelmingly no, you cant ask a biased crowd that still thinks kobe is ahead of lebron and expect reasonable answers.
Even rob parker who called lebron the phony goat and says he will never be jordan, agrees he is the second greatest ever along with broussard, but to clowns on thecoli steph just needs 1 more ring to ''pass'' lebron. its clowns asking clowns and then circle jerking the opinion
Dog, everybody but you understands what I meant. You truly are an idiot.For context this goofy was crying about 2K having a LeBron era starting in 2011 and he says how can it start in 2011 when Steph and the Warriors were there as if Steph and the Warriors weren’t a lottery team in 2011. I could understand if you said the Spurs or something but the Dubs weren’t even a factor until 2015.
What’s the criteria for “best player in the league” over time? Arguments can be made for a lot of players depending on criteria over time, like Kareem. Ex:Timmy won chips in 3 different decades and has a better career winning percentage with only being on one team.Lebron been the best player in the league longer than anyone ever. Only Gretzky had a comparable run
Lebron been the best player from 2009-2020What’s the criteria for “best player in the league” over time? Arguments can be made for a lot of players depending on criteria over time, like Kareem. Ex:Timmy won chips in 3 different decades.
This nikka ran the weak east then these nikka took his talents to LA and had the 1st seed .What’s the criteria for “best player in the league” over time? Arguments can be made for a lot of players depending on criteria over time, like Kareem. Ex:Timmy won chips in 3 different decades.
this nikka be typing all this just to be wrong as fukkThis is the coli so the answer would be overwhelmingly no, you cant ask a biased crowd that still thinks kobe is ahead of lebron and expect reasonable answers.
Even rob parker who called lebron the phony goat and says he will never be jordan, agrees he is the second greatest ever along with broussard, but to clowns on thecoli steph just needs 1 more ring to ''pass'' lebron. its clowns asking clowns and then circle jerking the opinion
Kareem wasn't even the best player on half of the championship teams he was on. Duncan wasn't even a top 10 player in the league in 2014.What’s the criteria for “best player in the league” over time? Arguments can be made for a lot of players depending on criteria over time, like Kareem. Ex:Timmy won chips in 3 different decades and has a better career winning percentage with only being on one team.