Does Back To The Future III disqualify the series from being a GOAT trilogy

mannyrs13

Compound Kingpin
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
40,248
Reputation
15,783
Daps
88,562
Reppin
Focusville, USA
I'm a fan and got the DVD collection. I'll have to disagree. Wasn't as great as the first two but all three overall make up for it. It fits the time travel theme perfectly. Present, parents era, future, ancestors era. Where else could they have gone to?
 

Deltron

The Return
Top Supporter
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
49,261
Reputation
21,508
Daps
150,156
Reppin
The year 3030
Hell no. BttF IS the GOAT trilogy.

I know all three movies pretty much word for word plus all the random bullshyt trivia facts.

I won't lie though, as a kid I didn't like it much, but it's grown tremendously on me throughout the years.

The intricate details seeded in Part 2 that would manifest in Part 3 as well as the overall arcs. All three movies played them out perfectly.

Part 1 being about Marty's dad, Part 2 about Marty, and Part 3 about Doc...the three central characters of the series and how they evolved. Plus crazy Biff.

1985-A Biff is still one of the most gangsta ass characters ever. No fukks given.


Also, you gotta love how the used the term Back to the Future in all three.

Honestly I only liked the first one. The BTTFII is overrated.

Hell nah...BttF's storyline is still one of the best/original using Time Travel. The writers sort of wrote themselves in the corner after Part 1's closing joke about Marty's kids in the future. They flipped it pretty well all things considered...and dropping Crispin gave us a good story for Hell Valley...I honestly don't think the proposed BttF 2 scripts when Marty goes to the 60's and shyt to see his Pops would've been as good as what we had w/ George murdered. It showed us how bitter Biff truly was and how he'd do anything to get back at Geoege. Also seeing part 1 in another perspective while maintaining what was established in still making sense was creative and a good ass story.

And as mentioned above, Hell Valley 1985-A was fukking gutter/gangster as fukk. Biff was a fukking boss. Straight up shot up George...lead poisoning.

Gave Lorianne the titty upgrade, had Doc's ass committed.



Plus for better or worse, recasting Crispin actually helped usher in some new laws/agreements over likeness of character...If I recall correctly, Crispin got paid out cause he sued their asses for part 2 use of a guy that looks like him. I don't remember 100% what the law is though.
 

RJY33

master of reality
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
4,075
Reputation
140
Daps
4,327
Ive liked part 3 better the older I got. Could be I appreciate Westerns more now :manny:. Its a lot slower than the first two but the comedy and story is just as good. The romance subplot was :patrice: but Doc deserved that. Biff is hilarious no matter what time period or ancestor he is :russ:

I said "butthead" constantly as a little kid after hearing Biff da gawd drop it on Marty :banderas:
 

TheGreatShowtime

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
52,046
Reputation
12,255
Daps
242,065
Reppin
The Swamp
The Bourne trilogy is the only trilogy I've seen get progressively better. Maybe LOTR too, but it's been awhile since I watched. So that, by default, is my "favorite" trilogy.
 

HamAndEgger

All Star
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
2,854
Reputation
230
Daps
4,834
I remember 2 coming out and going that Friday it came out. I was :banderas: when they went to the future and the story overall was good. The cliffhanger was dope but I was never a big Western movie fan so watching the end credits scene where they show the clips of part 3, I was sorta :patrice:. Then Part 3 drops...and at least when I was a kid it was :shaq2:. Like some have said in hindsight as I got older I liked it a little more, but 2 was always my favorite.
 
Top