I like him, though he can be very dishonest sometimes
This.
I like him, though he can be very dishonest sometimes
Since this thread got upped, I'll bite.
Sowell and his ilk have continually tried to connect welfare benefits with a sort of "worsening" of black culture and outcomes. Specifically when it comes to out of wedlock births in the great society era.
A simple google search helps us to understand that out of wedlock births were an issue with black people well before welfare benefits were established, as it was many times the rate of the white community dating back to the 1940s a time when it was socially dishonorable to have a child out of marriage. The graph seems to suggest that external pressures placed on black households have exacerbated poorer outcomes. Seems reasonable, no? (Ever hear of the Moynihan report?)
Sowell knows this, so why does he continue to engineer a dishonest profile that problems within the black community materialized because of welfare benefits? Well, Ive already explained why he does it in earlier posts.
And those rates for other "races" have risen at the same rate as blacks. White out of wedlock birth rates were less than 5% and now sit at close to 30%, and yet Ive never seen Sowell try to connect an availability of welfare benefits to the statistic rising among whites.
I havent seen a compelling study that proves any sort of real relationship between providing welfare benefits and out of wedlock births. Especially when considering that our set of welfare benefits are the stingiest in the world among high performing GDP nations.
Responsible statistical inference, and connecting real theories to broader populations and locating them in their proper context is what separates intellectuals from ideologues. Sowell is the latter.